Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
First shots with my Tamron 100-400 in the field.... opinions please...
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 2, 2017 20:16:49   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
I bought this lens because I was looking for a lighter weight telephoto. I have a Tam 150-600, but it just is too heavy to hand hold anymore and I found myself missing a lot of shots because I couldn't hold it steady. Have some arthritis and a little neuropathy, and I'm beginning to show signs.

I like the flexibility of holding hand held. I have seen some good photographers using a tripod and a gimbal and they look like they are dancing a waltz with their rigs. I am just not there yet.

The tripod collar was way overpriced, but I am going to opt for comfort instead of sticker shock.
Anyway, here are my first field shots.

Hope to get some action shots tomorrow.

Nikon D7100

about 25 ft at 400
about 25 ft at 400...
(Download)

same
same...
(Download)

about 100 ft
about 100 ft...
(Download)

maybe 1/4 mile
maybe  1/4 mile...
(Download)

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:26:33   #
kflyer Loc: ID-CO-AZ-WA
 
I like them, lighter wgt is at the top of my list. Your shots are "dime on".
Lighter is why I bought a Panasonic Lumis FZ200 light wgt 400 zoom.
Keith

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:31:04   #
hankm1 Loc: Mount Prospect IL
 
Great shots - nice and crisp.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 20:31:47   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
ggttc wrote:
I bought this lens because I was looking for a lighter weight telephoto. I have a Tam 150-600, but it just is too heavy to hand hold anymore and I found myself missing a lot of shots because I couldn't hold it steady. Have some arthritis and a little neuropathy, and I'm beginning to show signs.

I like the flexibility of holding hand held. I have seen some good photographers using a tripod and a gimbal and they look like they are dancing a waltz with their rigs. I am just not there yet.

The tripod collar was way overpriced, but I am going to opt for comfort instead of sticker shock.
Anyway, here are my first field shots.

Hope to get some action shots tomorrow.

Nikon D7100
I bought this lens because I was looking for a lig... (show quote)


They look fine to me. Looks like you bought the right lens for yourself!

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:35:19   #
Jim Bob
 
ggttc wrote:
I bought this lens because I was looking for a lighter weight telephoto. I have a Tam 150-600, but it just is too heavy to hand hold anymore and I found myself missing a lot of shots because I couldn't hold it steady. Have some arthritis and a little neuropathy, and I'm beginning to show signs.

I like the flexibility of holding hand held. I have seen some good photographers using a tripod and a gimbal and they look like they are dancing a waltz with their rigs. I am just not there yet.

The tripod collar was way overpriced, but I am going to opt for comfort instead of sticker shock.
Anyway, here are my first field shots.

Hope to get some action shots tomorrow.

Nikon D7100
I bought this lens because I was looking for a lig... (show quote)


Not bad. Train is on the soft side.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:41:28   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
hankm1 wrote:
Great shots - nice and crisp.


Its like any other piece of equipment ...you live and learn

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:42:47   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
lamiaceae wrote:
They look fine to me. Looks like you bought the right lens for yourself!


The real test is yet to come....

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 20:44:53   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
Jim Bob wrote:
Not bad. Train is on the soft side.


As with any telephoto....I was stretching it.

All lense have a limit....but thanks for looking.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 20:51:29   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Looks good. I use the Canon 100-400 mk 2 with 1.4x part of the time. I traded my Tamron 150-600 since the Canon combo gets me to 640 mm at f/8. So far I don't miss the little bit of extra speed.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 21:11:25   #
Sylvias Loc: North Yorkshire England
 
Sorry got the lens mixed up!

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 21:24:51   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
I think you have your lenses mixed up. ggttc got the Tamron 100-400, you are using the 18-400. Or did you buy both of them?

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 21:26:46   #
Sylvias Loc: North Yorkshire England
 
robertjerl wrote:
I think you have your lenses mixed up. ggttc got the Tamron 100-400, you are using the 18-400. Or did you buy both of them?

Thanks Robert my mistake. Time for bed I think!

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 21:29:38   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
robertjerl wrote:
Looks good. I use the Canon 100-400 mk 2 with 1.4x part of the time. I traded my Tamron 150-600 since the Canon combo gets me to 640 mm at f/8. So far I don't miss the little bit of extra speed.


Thanks for taking the time to take a look...only time will tell if this will work for me.

I have heard nothing but great things about the canon 100 400...but I am stuck with Nikon because of our investment in glass.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 21:33:17   #
Lagoonguy Loc: New Smyrna Beach, FL
 
Your photos look good to me. I just received my Tamron 100-400 yesterday and have only had a chance for some test shots on my D7100. I did have some good shots of the super moon tonight handheld. I’ll shoot some birds tomorrow hopefully. I think the lens balances nicely with the D7100 and feels lighter than I thought it would. I did not want a heavy lens. So far I don’t see a need to make any adjustments to the lens but I did get the Tap In just in case I needed it. I passed on the collar for now. I think it is a keeper.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 21:37:31   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
I think its a keeper too....going to try some action shots tomorrow if the cranes and weather cooperate....

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.