Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PHRubin
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 338 next>>
Oct 17, 2023 04:05:12   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Once again using “quote reply” will allow us to know who you’re responding to. What User ID was referring to when he said you’re at f/8 at 600mm was the fact that the lens has an actual focal length of 108mm. The small sensor size means that it will give you the same angle of view as a 600mm lens on a full frame camera. They call the difference the “crop factor”. Any sensor smaller than full frame has a crop factor. Your Nikons all have APS-C sensors. They have a crop factor of 1.5. That means the 18-400 lens on the D5500 is equivalent to a 27-600 lens on FF. The FZ200 has a crop factor of 5.6. The thing with the crop factor is it also applies to the aperture, not in the light capturing, but in depth of field. So while that 108mm lens at f/2.8 still works for exposure like an actual 600mm lens, the depth of field will be equivalent to a 600mm lens at over 5 stops higher, closer to f/11.
Once again using “quote reply” will allow us to kn... (show quote)


whatdat wrote:
Oops. The d5500 wears a 18-140. However,
Bridge camera fz200 reaches to 600 with a constant 2.8.


OK - Just to be accurate, that is comparing 2 different things. The 600 is a 35mm equivalent, or it magnifies as much as a 600mm lens on a 35mm (full frame) camera. The 140 is a true 140, but with the 1.5 crop factor camera, it has a 35mm equivalent of 140 X 1.5 or 210mm.

The FZ200 is an older camera. So is the FZ80. You might want to compare them. They are both 1/2.3" sensor types.
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 15:54:11   #
Since I can't find any info on a DX200, we need clarification. There was a bridge camera DMC-FZ200, now the DMC-FZ300 and there is the pocketable 1" model the DC-ZS200. There was also a bridge camera the Lumix DC-FZ80 which is still on the Panasonic website but no longer available new at some retailers. There are the 1" bridge cameras the DC-FZ1000 II and the DMC-FZ2500.
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 15:16:48   #
Capn_Dave wrote:
Canon made an add on diopter lens that went over the viewfinder. I found this one on Ebay https://www.ebay.com/itm/125059733920?chn=ps&_trkparms=ispr%3D1&amdata=enc%3A1hfM6tnQASjSHYYllr9E7Zg62&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&mkscid=101&itemid=125059733920&targetid=1583904486362&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9011476&poi=&campaignid=19894961968&mkgroupid=148855406073&rlsatarget=pla-1583904486362&abcId=9307911&merchantid=110865380
Canon made an add on diopter lens that went over t... (show quote)


I was going to say that years ago I had an eye cup on my film camera that had a space for a fixed diopter lens. If used today in conjunction with the adjustable one on the camera would extend its range. But then I learned to work with my glasses on so there was no longer any issue.

As for glasses, I've been old enough to need reading glasses in addition to a regular pair and bifocals drove me crazy, so I use progressive lenses, also known as no line lenses.
Go to
Oct 13, 2023 11:23:14   #
I use a gym bag and put my photo gear and my meds in it. It doesn't scream "expensive camera stuff". I use it as my carry-on. So far, they haven't opened the bag to inspect it.
Go to
Oct 12, 2023 11:43:32   #
I thought of the FZ80 which is an 18MP version rather than the FZ300 which is only a 12 MP, but while it is still on the Panasonic website, it seems not to be available in several stores. On the other hand, my 1st DSLR was an EOS XT with only 8 MP which seemed fine at the time.
Go to
Oct 11, 2023 01:52:52   #
Postman wrote:
I love my 80D as well, for hiking and kayaking it is light weight and functions well. I purchased the Sigma because at the time it was somewhat better than Canons 24-105 offering. Maybe a newer EF or even the RF 24-105 is in my future.


Good luck, whatever you decide.
Go to
Oct 10, 2023 13:44:44   #
Good news!
Go to
Oct 10, 2023 13:38:22   #
I had an old Sigma 18-250 zoom on my T2i. When I updated to my 80D it worked for a week, then started having the same issue you mention. I eventually wound up getting a new Sigma 18-300 lens for my 80D (which works fine on my R7) and have sold the T2i with 18-250. I still have the 80D, a wonderful camera.
Go to
Oct 10, 2023 13:33:11   #
As CHG_CANON alluded to, IBIS (In-Body-Image-Stabilization) is not available in DSLRs, only in some mirrorless models. However, many DSLR lenses have IS which is much better than the older lenses. Having a combination IBIS body/IS lens is the best. One can use the EF/EF-S lenses on an RF (mirrorless) Canon body if you use an adapter.

I recently sold a perfectly working T2i with an 18-250mm IS (they called it OS) enabled zoom lens to a friend. She loves it.
Go to
Oct 10, 2023 13:19:50   #
Red6 wrote:
I am a fan of travel cameras and have owned a few. I cannot offer any opinions on the Canon G5X but I did own a Lumix ZS70 which shares many features with the ZS100.

The ZS70 produced some excellent images and had great versatility. However, the menus can be a challenge. It takes some learning and practice to get to the point where you can use it efficiently. If you are willing and able to work through learning the menus and various settings, I do not think you will be disappointed.

You may want to also consider the ZS80 which replaced the ZS70. It is much like the ZS100 but has a longer focal length lens, which may or may not be an advantage. I do think the focal lengths of the ZS100 and Canon G5X may be the optimum range for these smaller cameras.

One big advantage of the ZS100 over the Canon G5X is price. The Lumix is considerably lower in price, but still a quality camera.

Hope this helps.
I am a fan of travel cameras and have owned a few.... (show quote)


The ZS70 and ZS80 have a 1/2.3" sensor as compared to the ZS100 having a 1" sensor. I have a ZS80 (basically the same as the ZS70) and a ZS100. Although the 100 is better in low light, I am very happy with both. The 70/80 have a longer lens. All 3 have essentially 20 MP sensors. For my preference I would have gotten the ZS200 for the longer lens.

You can compare them here:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Panasonic_DC-ZS80_vs_Panasonic_DMC-ZS100_vs_Panasonic_DC-ZS200_vs_Canon_G5+X+Mark+II/BHitems/1746227-REG_1242597-REG_1737439-REG_1490984-REG
Go to
Oct 9, 2023 12:46:31   #
Lenses fog when going from cold to warm only, not the other way around. So you only have to worry when bringing the equipment back into a warm building. Most people suggest putting the equipment in a sealed bag outside before taking it in and let it warm up inside in the bag. This keeps the indoor moisture away from the equipment until it is warm enough that fogging (condensation) won't happen.
Go to
Oct 9, 2023 01:30:54   #
Barn Owl wrote:
Architect1776, I was wanting both the butterfly and the details in the mums.


Are you familiar with depth of field techniques? How about focus stacking?
Go to
Oct 8, 2023 12:27:15   #
The standard is for a 50 mm (35mm equivalent), so the sensor size does matter. Actually, I believe, in reality, ~40-45mm is closer.
Go to
Oct 8, 2023 12:22:37   #
It appears to me that the flowers just above the head of the butterfly ARE in focus better than the insect. I'm guessing the focus type was off. A spot focus was called for.
Go to
Oct 7, 2023 13:37:20   #
Architect1776 wrote:
...According to Canon for the 600EX series and 580EX II you will need an adapter to use them on the R cameras with multifunction shoes.
Why not the older 580EX I don't know but it works on my R7 just fine as Canon says it should without the adapter...


I'm not sure what function, if any, is lost but I use my 550EX on my R7 and it works fine without any hot shoe adapter.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 338 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.