Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: docjoque
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7
Oct 2, 2011 02:28:45   #
jwegge11 wrote:
Let's say I do a photo shoot for my friends kids baseball game. I have 15 images I want to send to them. Seems I can only insert so many into an email AND they need to be seriously reduced.

Any advice on cheapest and quickest way to "attach" these photos or sending a link?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Jeff


All the aforementioned sites are great. Put on a blindfold, throw a dart, and that will do.

However, Walmart, Walgreens, and Costco offer sharing sites, and the people you send to can order prints and pick them up at any of the stores.

I personally like Picasa. There are so many really cool features aside from the sharing capabilities. Features such as face recognition, where pretty much EVERY face in all your pics are recognized and categorized. So if you are looking for a picture of Aunt Suzie, you just punch in "Aunt Suzie" and every photo you have on your computer of Aunt Suzie will pop up....even her baby photos. This thing is scary! The face movie is something that is really cool too.

Another great feature is that others can add to an album, if you allow. This is great for when your family goes on vacation, or when different people are taking pictures at a family function. You can set the album up such that anyone that you allow can add photos to the album, and anyone with the link can see all the pictures that have been added there. If someone likes a picture, they can then download it and print it, or send it to one of the other sites to be printed.
Go to
Oct 2, 2011 02:14:12   #
liv2paddle wrote:
bobmielke wrote:
liv2paddle wrote:
Is there a light switch in that cave you live in? LOL
kodak gallery is a good one..free!!! and you can get the image back.by hitting photo option..full resolution download..and retreive it anytime.Your friends can also have one printed at reasonable cost. Good luck caveman.


Antagonistic remarks are not called for on this or any other forum.


Lighten up Bob..is a sense of humor illegal in your part of the country?


Your remarks are racist to all Cavemen. :-)

See, I used an emoticon, which signifies lightheartedness. Don't forget yours, lest you be chastised.
Go to
Aug 16, 2011 10:42:04   #
Get Photography for Dummies, or Complete Idiot's guide to Photography. These books explain just about everything in very easy to understand terms. Get a good basic knowledge, then go to the book store and look at photography coffee table books to try to determine what settings they used to get the particular shot. They are also great inspiration. Then get out there and shoot shoot shoot.
Go to
Aug 16, 2011 10:36:20   #
I remember a seminar i went to in 1980ish to listen to a world renowned photog. I was just getting into photography, so much of what he said was over my head. Something that he said (that didn't make sense to me at the time), finally sunk in 20 year later when I finally experienced it for myself.

He said, "A body is a body is a body. The glass is what's going to make jaws drop. Determine a budget and figure out how much you can possibly spend on a lens - then double it!"

I always did the opposite. I spent a fortune on bodies, and scrimped on the glass. I never thought about it, because my pictures were great (so I thought). I bought my first L series lens and the VERY FIRST picture did make my jaw drop. I had forgotten what I had heard 25 years earlier, but it all came flooding back after that first shot.

I met a photog in the field who was shooting with an old Pentax camera. I recognized him and asked him why he was shooting with a old Pentax, especially when he was sponsored by Canon. He said basically the same thing; the body doesn't matter and it's all about the lens. His favorite lens happened to be a Pentax lens, so when he was by himself and thought there was no chance of running into people, he'd ditch his Canon and shoot his Pentax.

So back to making me a believer: I have a 1D, 5D, 7D, and a Rebel. I don't notice a difference in the bodies, but I notice a huge difference with the lenses.
Go to
Aug 8, 2011 14:42:07   #
Lavolpebxr wrote:
JDTX, having never heard of the *rule of 3rd's*, I had no idea. I've looked it up on the internet, and I understand what you're saying. Now I know why my camera has a *tic tac toe* grid in the view finder, and I plan to make good use of it. Thanks. I've re-cropped a couple pics. Please tell me what you think of my use of *the rule*.


Rules were meant to be broken. It's good to know about the Rule of Thirds, but it's not a bible. And macro is tougher to follow the rule. Just remember, the subject doesn't necessarily need to fall on a hatch. Zoom in, and maybe make the eye or the antenna, or a prominent marking on the wing fall on the hatch mark.

Giving the subject somewhere to go is key, but in macro, that "somewhere to go" can be very small.
Go to
Aug 8, 2011 14:37:13   #
trishrose wrote:
jdtx wrote:
many many advantages..one you can change the White Balance easily..thus if you do have a red cast for some reason you can take it out ..and working in PS in Raw is none damaging to your images, when you work with them in jpg mode every time you save them it compresses the file and you lose some of the quality of the picture..


Jdx, I remember reading about the compression of files, but hard to comprehend, I need to SEE what it does. So. I'll try that. I've read many books and tutorials, but it doesn't sink in my head. I'm a hands on learner. Wish I could find a pro willing to let us newbies tag along . That's how I learn. Thanks for the info.
Trish
quote=jdtx many many advantages..one you can chan... (show quote)


Sounds like you'd really benefit from some seminars and safaris. Do a search and see what is in your area....maybe at a local camera shop. I know there are many in the SoCal area, and you really learn a lot. And even if you already know it, it's a good refresher and good inspiration.
Go to
Aug 8, 2011 14:32:59   #
trishrose wrote:
Thanks jdtx for the info. All is appreciated.Maybe you can help me with something. The picture of my daughter-the couples picture-I like the photo, but is it just my eyes or does it seem a bit on the red side-I have this problem with alot of my photos. But if I try editing the color, when it's printed , it looks too light. Camera or monitor or photographer problem?
I agree with the confusion on which photo one is referring to, but it's interesting hearing the comments. Thanks again.
Trish
Thanks jdtx for the info. All is appreciated.Maybe... (show quote)


Trish, it's looks fine on my end. The problem is calibrating ALL you devices, and making sure you're using the right profiles too. All very confusing, this technical stuff, but you've already got "the eye", so you're ahead of the game.
Go to
Aug 7, 2011 13:18:41   #
Roman wrote:
I wouldn't crop, there is detail in the photo that explains the Mood what I like to do is use different lights to enhance key features on my subject try even using a flash light to focus on a certain spot like the cross necklace she's wearing. Well I would cover a major part of the flash using tape using it like a hood, to be able to focus on certain objects now if money is not a problem than feel free to get different light sources. they come in handy. ROMAN


Great photo, Roman. Exposure and composition is very appealing.
Go to
Aug 7, 2011 13:18:26   #
Jdtx, great pic. Perhaps a little reflected light on the face. The hair is a bit distracting.
Go to
Aug 7, 2011 13:16:37   #
Great pic. Perhaps a little reflected light on the face. The hair is a bit distracting.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.