Don't kid yourself, libs are trying to create a one party system that eventually will not look much different than China, they are doing so by unfettered immigration into the United States and will eventually strive to allow these people to v**e in our e******ns. Coupled with the handouts that they are continuously advocating for from the US government they plan to make the republican party no more than a memory. If you want to see the future that the demonics are striving for one has to look no further than California.

"By saying he wouldn’t allow American intelligence to cultivate an asset so close to Kim, he’s saying he wouldn’t use spying to better understand the country’s biggest overseas challenge.

Put another way, he’s ruling out having the best information possible headed into high-stakes negotiations. Tying one hand behind your back like this makes sense only if you have a messianic belief in your own negotiating prowess—which Trump does, despite the collapse of the most recent round of talks.

It might be a moot point, however, because by responding this way, Trump is sending a clear message to any would-be informants: The United States doesn’t have your back.

Why would any other North Korean take the risk of ending up like Kim Jong Nam?

Kim Jong Nam’s assassination wasn’t just Kim k*****g his brother and rival; it wasn’t even just North Korea using chemical weapons in a foreign country. It was North Korea k*****g an American intelligence asset in the early days of the Trump administration, a test of the new president’s resolve."


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/06/trump-kim-no-north-korea-spying-under-my-auspices/591457/

Dr. Michael Brown

If you ask my detractors, they would tell you that the reason I do not celebrate gay p***e is that I’m a bigot. A h**er. A homophobe. A t***sphobe.

And I understand their perspective.

After all, no matter how Christian I claim to be, if I tell a gay couple I do not believe they are truly married in God’s sight, that feels like hatred to them.

If I tell a woman who identifies as a man that I still believe she is a woman, that feels like hatred to her.

From their perspective, I can understand how unchristian my position seems, how bigoted, how biased, how primitive.

After all, they would be quick to point out, there are gay parents who are more dev**ed to their kids than some straight parents.

There are t*********r men and women who are kind, gentle, caring souls.

There are people all across the L**T spectrum who help the poor, who care for the oppressed, who love the loveless, who are outstanding bosses or employees or friends or neighbors.

Why shouldn’t all of us celebrate gay (or, L**T) p***e?

For me, there are three major reasons, and none of them have anything to do with hatred or fear.

First, I do not accept the categories of L**T as fixed and definite categories, worthy of special recognition.

Put another way, why should there be a special month to celebrate people based on their sexual desires and romantic attractions? Or based on their g****r identity perceptions?

The very fact that we’ve gone from G (as in gay) to LG, to LGB, to L**T, to L***Q, to L***QI to L***QIP (and beyond) indicates that these are hardly fixed categories.

Or, to zero in on the letter B, why should I celebrate someone who is attracted to both males and females? Why should I put them in a special category (like Hispanic or Asian or Black)?

If the person happens to a courageous firefighter, I’ll celebrate them for that. If the person happens to be a cancer survivor with an amazing story, I’ll celebrate them for that.

They are fellow human beings, and if they deserve honor or commendation, I’ll gladly give that to them. But I won’t celebrate their bisexuality. Why should I?

And that leads to my second point.

If I’m convinced that homosexual practice is contrary to God’s design, why should I celebrate it?

If I personally know people whose same-sex attractions were the result of childhood sexual abuse and rape, why should I celebrate those attractions?

If I’m convinced that, ideally, a child should have a mommy and a daddy (rather than two mommies or two daddies), why should I celebrate a family setting that willfully deprives that child of either their mother or father?

Do we celebrate single parent p***e? No, we say to those single parents, “It must be hard to raise your child on your own, but we’re standing with you to help.”

There’s quite a difference.

And why should I celebrate t*********r identity? What is there to celebrate?

Why should I celebrate putting a child on hormone blockers? Why should I celebrate a 17-year-old girl having her breasts removed? Why should I celebrate a lifelong regimen of hormones? Why should I celebrate something that causes so many people so much pain, even after “t***sitioning?”

If you asked me to stand with those who identify as t*********r and offer them support and compassion and hope, I would say, “Count me in.”

If you asked me to stand against their harassment and mistreatment, again I would say, “Count me in.”

But if you ask me to celebrate their t*********r identity (and all the challenges that come with it), I would have to politely decline.

Third, and finally, I do not celebrate L**T p***e because there is an agenda attached to it.

In other words, this is not just a matter of me appreciating L**T people as people, or recognizing their accomplishments for the sake of their accomplishments.

Instead, to celebrate L**T p***e is to recognize and embrace a larger cultural agenda.

As I explained in 2011, “the legitimizing of homosexuality as a perfectly normal alternative to heterosexuality also requires that all opposition to homosexual behavior must be delegitimized. At the very least, the gay agenda requires these three platforms (and let recognized gay leaders renounce this if it is not so).

“Whereas homosexuality was once considered a pathological disorder, from here on those who do not affirm homosexuality will be deemed h********c, perhaps themselves suffering from a pathological disorder.

“Whereas gay sexual behavior was once considered morally wrong, from here on public condemnation – or even public criticism – of that behavior will be considered morally wrong.

“Whereas identifying as t*********r was once considered a******l by society, causing one to be marginalized, from here on those who do not accept t*********rism will be considered a******l and will be marginalized.”

And remember, I wrote this in 2011. (In fact, I wrote this several years earlier, but these comments were not published until 2011.)

Again, from the L**T viewpoint, L**T p***e is all about coming out of the closet. It’s about saying, “We’re just as good and as gifted and as normal as anyone else, and rather than being ashamed of our L**T identity, we are proud of it. The days of being mistreated are over. That’s what L**T p***e is all about!”

Again, I understand these sentiments, and if it was a matter of caring for people as people, I’d march side by side with them.

But it’s not just that. It’s about creating new categories and foisting them on the society. It’s about celebrating something that should not be celebrated. It’s about a larger agenda.

For those reasons, I do not celebrate gay p***e, even though it makes be a h**eful bigot in the eyes of many L**T people and their allies.

That saddens me, but that doesn’t change my convictions.

June remains just another month on my calendar. It is not marked off for L**T p***e.

https://www.christianpost.com/voice/why-i-do-not-celebrate-gay-p***e.html

"Six Democratic candidates would best President Donald Trump in potential 2020 matchups, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac University, released on Tuesday.

The poll shows 53 percent of v**ers say they would support Biden, while 40 percent say they would v**e for Trump.

The gap is smaller for Sens. Bernie Sanders (9 points, or 51 to 42 percent), Kamala Harris (8 points, or 49 to 41 percent) and Elizabeth Warren (7 points, 49 to 42 percent).

Other candidates, like Sen. Cory Booker and South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg lead by a five-point margin (5 points, 47 to 42 percent).

"The head-to-head matchups give this heads up to President Donald Trump's team: Former Vice President Joseph Biden and other Democratic contenders would beat the president if the e******n were held today.

Leads range from Biden's 13 percentage points to thin five-point leads by Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Cory Booker," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll."

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-41-trends-twitter-after-new-poll-suggests-six-dems-would-beat-him-1443500

You just can't help yourself, you keep on spewing that trump/Russia propaganda!

The GOP has avoided any investigation into trump.

The DOJ/Barr, acting as trumps personal lawyer, is only soothing trumpy boy's feelings by opening an investigation into his enemies.

Real leaders don't need to threaten their enemies. They actually lead by example, not from FEAR!

trump is looking worse than Nixon with his actions, his Crimes of Obstruction of Justice are 10 times worse than Nixon's were.

In 1974 the House DID file Articles of Impeachment against Nixon, but Nixon finally saw the writing on the wall and resigned before those Articles of Impeachment could be v**ed on in the full House.

Fast forward 34 years, and trump never learned his civics lessons in school, never read the Constitution, and doesn't understand how the process of Impeachment works.

trump CAN'T just go the Supreme Court to get the Articles of Impeachment thrown out. There will be no relief from the Courts this time for trump. He can't lie his way out of his problems, because it's his decades long history of lies that got him into this situation in the first place!

No matter how "smart" trump thinks he is, the Unstable Genius is reeling on multiple fronts.

He's facing problems because of his actions during his campaign, and since he took his Oath of Office.

He's facing serious challenges on the campaign trail from all of the candidates running for office in 2020, where he's seriously under water against most of the other candidates who're running, and he's facing challenges on his policies and where trump has chosen to take his administration.

Directions that the majority of the American v**ers are against. V**ers who chose to cast their v**e for trump in 2016 turned against him in 2018 by v****g to elect DEMOCRATS to office all across the country from Local, to State, to Federal Offices, are now turning against trump in 2020 as they're enduring the results of what trump and the GOP have done to our economy through the 2017 alleged tax cut bill (which was just revealed to be a complete lie), and through the trump trade wars and the trump tariffs.

The average American v**er will now be paying around $3,000 additional each year in increased prices for goods that they buy as a direct result of the trump tariffs!

Nah, there's no way he'll be reelected!

Try as you might, you can't trumpsplain away his Obstruction of Justice - High Crimes.

Barr blinked when he was threatened with being charged in Federal Court with the first of already three Contempt of Congress charges, and he's finally started to make evidence from the Mueller Investigation available to Congress. If he fails to complete the turnover of all of the evidence, those Contempt of Congress charges will be headed to a Federal Court to compel Barr to turn over the remainder of the evidence.

The House will be v****g tomorrow to file a request in Federal Court to gain access to the Mueller Grand Jury testimony and evidence.

trump's tax returns WILL be turned over to Richard Neal, Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. No matter how hard trump and his lawyers fight, they're fighting a losing battle and only delaying the inevitable.

But that's been trumps Modus Operandi, exagerate, bluff and bluster, delay, delay, delay, then try to claim victory when in fact he fell flat on his face trying to negotiate.

By the way, that was nothing more than a f**e letter from Mexico that trump held up as "evidenced" that Mexico had caved and had allegedly made a secret deal with the trump administration over the caravans of asylum seekers!

When will you folks on the Right ever admit that you were conned by Don the Con? The sooner that you admit you made a huge mistake in judgment, the sooner you can begin heeling your tortured egos!

Let the trump embarrassments begin.

I'm going to enjoy watching the trump melt downs as more and more evidence is revealed, and testimony continues before the various House Committees as they move forward with their investigations into trump, and the trump administration!

Deflection isn't going to work any longer for trump to change the news cycle away from the Russia investigations. V**ers have wised up, and they're seeing trump for what he truly is, a liar and a Con Artist!

Even the 2017 Tax Cut was a con! It will NOT pay for itself with increased revenues, it was nothing more than a get rich quick scheme for the wealthy and large businesses, and to be used as a means to cut services for the low and lower income earners.