Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: billnikon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 ... 1185 next>>
Jun 9, 2019 06:07:06   #
JeffDavidson wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post so here goes.

My photos have been accepted to display as a one man exhibit at a local art gallery in Thousand Oaks, CA.

If you are local, I would love to have you stop by.

Thanks for all that I have learned and will continue to learn from fellow UHH's

Sincerely,


Congratulations.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 12:36:48   #
Aluminum monopod with two tilt heads, allows horizontal and vertical shooting and also tilts forward and backward. Unit has two extension legs. 26 inches closed, 62 inches with two legs deployed.
Unit also features a spike foot which retracts into rubber foot (see photo's) Unit is used, see scratches, but the monopod acts like it is still new. Very unique design, not many like this were made.
$30.00 plus $10.00 for shipping in heavy duty cardboard tube. Paypal only.


















Go to
Jun 8, 2019 08:17:27   #
Tommy II wrote:
Unless you’re a professional photographer, you’ll you’ll enjoy the convenience of not having to change lenses. As far as Nikon vs Sigma or Tamron, I’ve used both models, and again, unless you’re a professional l, you’ll enjoy using any of them. Go out and have fun with whichever you choose.


I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. Too much jargon, technology terms, personal opinions on this lens. IF YOUR NOT A PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER, YOU WILL NOT NOTICE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS LENS.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:47:53   #
Boobarf wrote:
Folks- I'm heading to Yellowstone, camping in Canyon campground. I's been 2 years ago in August since my last photo trip and I'm going to focus (yes, pun meant) on wildlife this trip. Had some decent luck with Grizzly Bear, a couple of wolves & eagles last trip in Lamar Valley.

So-- I'm planning on early AM and late afternoons-evenings in Lamar and Hayden. I know I can get plenty of Bison in the Valleys as well as Elk in Mammoth. Any advice or other locations? I'll have a week to shoot. I know MT Shooter is there quite a bit and had some good advice for me on my last trip.

Thanks- Brian
Folks- I'm heading to Yellowstone, camping in Cany... (show quote)


https://www.yellowstonepark.com/photos/ken-hubbard-photo-tips
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:45:56   #
assman wrote:
I am just an enthusiast with a Lightroom subscription. I am looking for some kind of cloud storage/backup for all my photos (jpg, dng, etc.) along with videos and my Lightroom folder. My thought is to get Amazon Prime plus the 100mb additional storage for videos (I don't do a lot of that) and my Lightroom folder files. It's either that or maybe SmugMug where I can actually sync my stuff (so they say) and use it for sharing photos. Or should I just can the idea and do my backups and just export to Google?

Thanks,
assman
I am just an enthusiast with a Lightroom subscript... (show quote)


I have the photographers version of Lightroom and Photoshop for $10.00 a month. I like it. No con's from me.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:44:43   #
whatdat wrote:
All: looking for some good advice concerning the Nikon 18-300mm 3.5-5.6 VR lens. I have kit lenses for my d5xxx series cameras which include 18-55, 55-200, and 55-300, all VR AF-S. Get mixed reviews from DPReview concerning warping @ 18mm & vignetting @ or near 300mm. Used price through CC 499.99. Please let me know what you think. Depending on UHH’s thoughts I may need to cancel my order and stick with the lenses I already have. My only reason for looking at the 18-300 was convenience. I know I’ll get some good info from you’all. Need to know as soon as possible. Thanks.
All: looking for some good advice concerning the ... (show quote)


I have always liked this lens. But, for what it's worth. This is what Ken Rockwell says about it.
The Nikon 18-300mm VR can replace the combination of 18-55mm VR and 55-300mm VR lenses in one lens.

This one-lens 18-300mm VR solution weighs as much as both other lenses combined, but in exchange for not needing to change lenses between ranges, costs twice as much as the pair.

Don't use this 18-300 on FX or 35mm cameras. It will never fill the frame on 35mm, and you'll only be using the small central area of the FX frame and viewfinder. For FX and 35mm, use the 28-300 VR.

For DX cameras, this lens is an easy recommendation. There is nothing on Earth like this lens. Nothing else covers this huge range with VR and instant manual-focus override. Mud brands like Tamron usually offer cheap copies, sometimes with even broader zoom ranges, but they usually lack full-time manual focus override or good VR, and certainly lack mechanical quality and often lack future compatibility with new Nikon cameras.

This Nikon 18-300mm VR is a big, competent lens. I prefer the smaller 18-200 VR, but if you really need 300mm instead of 200mm, then this 18-300mm VR is your lens. See Nikon 18-200 vs. 28-300 vs. 18-300 for more details.

I prefer a smaller lens over having to carry a bigger lens all the time just for the few times I need 300mm. Most people will jump at the chance to get out to 300mm with a twist of the wrist. Personally, carrying a lens this big for what are supposed to small DX cameras seems silly to me, but most people are going to prefer this lens. Just be careful: what seems not too heavy when first opening your box from Adorama gets a lot heavier after carrying it around your neck all day.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:37:28   #
lblann wrote:
As I took my Grandson to his last day of school before he graduates, it started to rain lightly. I'd left my D3200 on my back deck on a tripod to shoot some hummingbirds. My DSLR seems ok, but I began to think...the weather is not always perfect. How much can it take? What's the worst conditions you guys have braved the elements for an image?


If it rains, my sealed D850 and sealed 500 5.6 stay at home. I never venture into conditions that are questionable. No shot is worth the loss of thousands of dollars worth of equipment.
I always carry a garbage bag in my back pocket. If it starts to rain, into the bag my camera and lens go.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:34:14   #
JoeMcD wrote:
Last month, when Nikon had their sale going on, I purchased a refurbished Nikon D850 from NikonUSA.

After receiving it, I took a few shots with it to test it out. Then I decided to check the shutter count on the camera to see how many actuations were on the shutter. The Camera Shutter Count web site reported it at 17.

I couldn't believe it, but then I got to thinking, maybe they reset the number of actuations when they refurbish a camera. What is your thoughts about this, do they reset the shutter actuations when they refurbish a camera?
Last month, when Nikon had their sale going on, I ... (show quote)


NO. Nikon does not reset the shutter count. If they did, it would be 0.
You have to understand, most refurbished camera's are BUYERS REMORSE, or, better yet, this notion that they got a BAD COPY (this one is a real laugh) cause maybe, maybe, one in 10,000 is a bad copy, and even then, it is a stretch.
Another misnomer about refurbished is that Nikon does a complete redo on the camera, NOT. They give the camera a cursory check. They can do this quickly, efficiently, and professionally. If there is a problem they will correct it. But 99.9% of the time there is nothing wrong with the camera (so much for bad copy).
I worked in a camera store and was a Nikon rep back in the middle ages and I can tell you stories and stories on why folks return equipment, suffice to say that their are folks out there how would not be happy if they could walk on water.
Anyway, you have a great camera with a very low shutter count, congratulations on your excellent decision making. You have the greatest megapixel camera made to date. You are a winner.
Go to
Jun 8, 2019 06:25:05   #
watersedge wrote:
is manual setup of shutter speed and apparture and using auto iso better than using apperature or shutter speed prority and iso auto


It depends on what your shooting and the lighting conditions. For me, manual is what I have always used. Manual everything, including ISO.
I am a control freak, I like to control everything. If I could, I would direct the animals and birds I photograph. But alas, I cannot. But I can control my camera, so, I do.
In AUTO, you give up control to the camera, I am not willing to allow my inanimate object control over me.
But, in photography, like in everything else, we have FREE WILL, in other words, to each his own. I take great shots in manual, and until I do not I will continue to turn out award winning results.
So, to finally answer your question, IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU WANT.
Go to
Jun 6, 2019 12:59:46   #
neelywc wrote:
I have several snapshots dating back to the twenties. Drugstore developed and printed, not very archival. They are very faded but still have visible images. They are of deceased family members and thus important to me. Can anyone recommend a photo restoration service that could restore these?
Thanks for any advice!
WCN


Sue at Campus Camera in Kent Ohio does restorations. 330-678-1297
Go to
Jun 6, 2019 06:22:12   #
Steve Dollar wrote:
I have a granddaughter who has just started her photography business. She has purchased a Nikon 750 with kit lens. She already has a few gigs, including a wedding. She has a wonderful eye and has produced some excellent photos. She doesn't have a prime lens. What prime lens would you recommend for her head shots. I believe that a 100mm more or less but what manufacturer. I could buy her the Nikor but is that really what is needed and is that the price one needs to pay?


Nikon 85mm 1.8 for $426.00. One of the best and sharpest lenses produced. Read the reviews here.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=nikon%2085mm%20f%2F1.8&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ps
Go to
Jun 6, 2019 06:19:24   #
nl wrote:
I am a new artist with a dozen paintings I wish to photograph and then sell copies and/or gyclees of them online. I'm not sure what's out there, or which direction to go. Some paintings are watercolor, some acrylic, and some pastel (all flat). They range in size from 6" x 10", upwards to 36" x 72". Some of the smaller ones I might have scanned. I'm not sure if scanning the large ones would be more cost effective in the long run than taking my own photos. With my own photos, at least I have the option of some minor editing in photoshop. The mid size paintings average 16" x 20" to 28" x 40". I want to offer enlargements up to 36" x 60" without distortion. I may print some on metal or glass as well.
I saw a Sony Alpha SLT-a99ii on Amazon for sale for $500. I thought the 42 mp's might do a better job although the files would be very large, but I questioned the price as all the other 42mp's sell for 5x's more. His offer on Amazon has since been taken down (he claimed his contract ran out), and to order one has to contact him instead of Amazon. Sounded a little shady to me. The other camera that sounded good is a Nikon D850, but it's also out of my price range.
Nonetheless, any advice on what camera to buy, and what lens is appropriate for what I need to do for under $1,000, is welcome. Thanks, NL
I am a new artist with a dozen paintings I wish to... (show quote)


Nikon D7000 and a Nikon 60 mm 2.8 D micro lens.
$299.00 for the D7000
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nikon-D7000-16-2MP-DSLR-Camera-body-two-batteries-and-two-SD-cards-Only-3k-click/143283791675?hash=item215c61273b:g:imcAAOSwCtVc-JrL:sc:USPSPriority!33472!US!-1

About $200.00 for the Nikon 60mm 2.8 D lens
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nikon-60mm-f-2-8D-AF-Micro-Nikkor-Lens/123790025117?hash=item1cd275e19d:g:aAwAAOSwZx5c8rij

So, for about $500.00 your good to go.
Go to
Jun 5, 2019 09:14:39   #
wjones8637 wrote:
Looking over past photos using my Nikkor 35mm 18. and my Nikkor 50mm 1.8 on a D7100, I notice that when using the 35mm peoples noses and stomaches appear to be slightly larger than reality. When using the 50mm they appear more normal. I know this to be true with full frame cameras, but since the cropper sensor in the D7100 gives a more or less "normal eye range" I never thought about it . Now the question, for portraits and other people shots will I get more pleasing photos using the 50mm, a 105mm Sigma, or one of the zooms set to about 85mm? I know I would need to back-up for the composition.
Looking over past photos using my Nikkor 35mm 18. ... (show quote)

The angle of view of your 50 on the D7100 is 75 mm. My favorite portrait lens was my old manual Nikon 105 mm AIS F/2.5 (the same lens that took the FAMOUS National Geographic Cover years ago). I now use my 70-200 2.8 lens for portraits.
If I were you, I would use the 50 until you get to the point you want to take it to the next step.
Go to
Jun 5, 2019 09:07:54   #
vbhargava wrote:
Hi Hoggers
I am planning a car trip from San Diego next week to Sedona for one night and then driving to Grand Canyon for two nights. Please help me with suggestions as to what would be good spots not to miss as well as what equipment I should take. I have a Sony A7iii, with a Sony 16-35mm, Tamron 24-70mm, Nikon D750, with 24-120mm, 28-300mm, 10-24mm, 20mm, 105mm, 18-55mm, 55-200mm, and Tamron 150-600mm G1, Gitzo tripod, and ND & CPL filters. I would like to carry on hikes what will fit in my backpack. I am more familiar with my Nikon as I have owned it now for over 4 years and purchased Sony late last year.
I am 75 yrs and still can carry some equipment but not too much. I want to do more landscape photography and some wild life if comes my way.
Look forward to hearing your suggestions on good spots and choice of equipment.
Thanks.
Mikky
Hi Hoggers br I am planning a car trip from San Di... (show quote)

Tripadvisor.com
Also, sunset at the airport in Sedona, do not miss it. And, it is free, well, maybe parking, not sure they still charge but it is still a good deal.
Go to
Jun 5, 2019 09:06:11   #
Bill4walsh wrote:
I now live where I have a Brook and lots of bird life. I was going to pick up the new Tamron 150-600mm G2. Then I saw a Canon 100-400, first version for a little more. Canon was used. I thought about a 1.4 extender. I have the Canon 5d II.


The 100-400 I had many, many, problems, especially image quality. I would not go anywhere near it, especially used, this lens was a vacuum for dust.
I know many, many, Canon shooters here in Florida, and they love the 100-400 II. It is a much better lens than the tamron, hands down.
It appears you have a budget. I know the 100-400 II would be a stretch for you, but I have seen this lens reduced many times during the year. In fact, it is currently on sale at $400.00 off.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=canon%20ef%20100-400mm%20f%2F4.5-5.6l%20is%20ii%20usm%20lens&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ps
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 ... 1185 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.