Lacking rcarol's expertise, I quite like the roses. I might like the first shot better with the blossoms to the right cropped out, but a practiced viewer's eye can do that for him/herself.

Thanks for sharing.

It does indeed, and I'm sure the photographer was smiling to catch this spectacular pose. Nice shot!

As the future arrives, only the elderly recognize it as the future.

Beautiful! Quick lesson in how to close a debate with a perfect illustration. Just sayin’.

Is 2 and 6 the same guy? My fav. Love the set, though.

A handsome fellow well shot!

Surely that does not say “Failing!” “Sailing?”

Like the pensive shot. Looks spontaneous.

Practicing his flamingo pose?

Not suggesting this means you ARE, but to those who rally to population control as the world's solution, I ask, "Why are you still here?" I understand the threat of overpopulation, but if this is a discussion aimed at promoting programmed kill-offs, like some are incredibly accusing poor Bill Gates of contriving with his vaccine potion, or like rehashing the ethnic cleansing agenda bragged about by Margaret Sanger, we all need to turn off the computers and go take pictures.

Interesting reading... well, unless you limit yourself to only those writers of news who get thrills trickling down their legs when they hear someone like Obama read a speech. (Bet he regrets admitting that personal excitement on a national broadcast.)

Classic example of "best defense" is an obnoxious insult. Talk about stereotyping and the "if they don't think as I do, they're deplorables" mentality!

Science often takes decades to self-correct. Or longer. History sometimes never self-corrects. As much as we want to hope JFK was assassinated by a sole gunman, a great many people of all descriptions will be pondering that one forever. And this CovidScare will prove to be a head-screwing mix of both those studies. Too many inconsistencies for that NOT to be the case.

True enough, in general. I think the reference was to Snopes being "liberal" and thus a "suspect" tool for checking the veracity of "fact vs fiction." That really isn't a knucklehead observation. It only requires that one check multiple sources to see that any event that does not support the prevailing point of view of the national press and the democrat party, even when found to be mostly true, will be hemmed and hawed to dirtiness just because Snopes can't let itself say, yes, that is true. On the other hand, Snopes will dismiss all sorts of shades of gray in support of an event it can say "True" about when one of the holy anointed has said it.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/ comes much closer to be an unbiased source... or at least seeming to. God only knows who out there is telling the truth these days. It sure as hell ain't Bill Gates.

Between the 2, I've found KEH offers more, but you can put in your list to both to get comparison quotes. I suspect it depends upon what they have and feel they can most easily sell at that given time.