Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: zug55
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 53 next>>
May 24, 2023 09:20:51   #
No camera needed for blogging.
Go to
May 24, 2023 09:17:20   #
It's a known fact that mirrorless cameras are more susceptible to sensor dust than DSLRs--this isn't just a Sony problem. I carry a rocket blower in my camera bag that takes care of any dust on the sensor 99% of the time. In five years of using Sony mirrorless cameras I have done three wet cleanings. It is easy to do.
Go to
May 23, 2023 03:22:10   #
As I mentioned before, I love my Sony 100-400mm. I particularly like its versatility. I am attaching a few shots to show the versatility and quality of this lens. To me, a key advantage over the 200-600mm is the minimum focus distance of just over 3 feet, as opposed to about 8 feet for the 200-600. This means that you can use it as a macro lens. All the shots are hand-held.

Swiss Alps


Freezing rain in Austin--nice bokeh


Flamingos in Lake Magadi, Kenya


Dusk over the Great Rift Valley, Kenya


Lake Naivasha, Kenya


Flowers with waterfall in the background--I like the bokeh balls


Tiny flowers

Go to
May 22, 2023 04:09:09   #
I was in a similar situation a little more than a year back. The Sony 24-105mm is my workhorse lens as well. At this point, I shoot with an A7III and A7RIII. I also have a Sony 70-300mm that I have learned to dislike.

Most would agree that the Sony 100-400mm GM and 200-600mm G are similar in image quality. There are pros and cons for each, and after careful consideration, I picked the 100-400mm lens. I am still very happy with that choice.

To me, the key factor was that the 100-400mm is considerably smaller and lighter, which makes it much more portable. For travel this is a serious advantage, and also if you have to carry the lens a lot. It easily fits into my backpack. Yes, it extends when zooming (in contrast to the 200-600mm), but that is a minor issue for me. It has a short focusing distance (just under one meter), so it has great macro capabilities. It also is a great landscape lens, and I like that it pairs with my 24-105mm without a gap. These two lenses are a powerful travel combo.

The obvious advantage of the 200-600mm is the extra reach, which is necessary for birding. I spend much of the year in Kenya, so wildlife shots are important to me. In most cases, 400mm gives me sufficient reach. I sometimes use Clear Image Zoom to extend the reach with good results. You also could add the 1.4x extender, which I am considering at this point.

I think that the key questions are how and for what purpose you are going to use your lens and if a focal range beyond 400mm is essential for you.
Go to
May 20, 2023 08:20:38   #
deleted
Go to
May 20, 2023 08:16:15   #
There is so much bad information in this thread. Let me sum up some points.

1) Yes, you can put any E-mount lens on a Sony A7RV and take pictures. You also can put tires from the discount store on a Ferrari. Just don't expect good performance, from your Ferrari or your Sony. Inferior lenses will give inferior images, even on a 61 MP camera body.

2) Forget superzooms (anything with a magnification factor of more than 5x). Superzooms are convenient, but they make compromises that hurt image quality. They may not be so obvious on a 24 MP camera bud definitely on a 61 MP body.

3) Forget A-mount lenses. Sony gave up the A-mount years ago, and all A-mount lens designs are a decade old. None of them were built to handle a 61 MP sensor. Furthermore, you need an adapter to use A-mount lenses on a Sony mirrorless camera.

4) Forget crop-sensor lenses. Some suggested APS-C lenses like the 18-135mm. You can put them on an A7R5, but the results will be disappointing. Why use an A7RV in APS-C mode? Would you drive your Ferrari only up to third gear?

Read up what gwilliams6 writes in this thread. He is a pro with lots of experience with numerous Sony mirrorless bodies and lenses. His comments are always spot-on.
Go to
May 20, 2023 07:51:46   #
Dennis833 wrote:
To get the best out of your camera you really should buy the Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS first and then look for another lens that will cover the longer range.



I think that this really good advice. This is a great lens that covers the basic focal ranges and that will be able to take advantage of the 61 MP of the Sony A7RV. I started out with this lens when I switched to Sony full frame, and it still is my workhorse lens.
Go to
May 18, 2023 11:59:06   #
bnsf wrote:
The only way you are going to get the proper lens that you are looking for is to purchase two Sony e mount lenses. 28-70mm and 70-300.

The lens you have for you a 99ii is a Minolta lens. Have this lens also and it works just fine.


I agree with the strategy, but not with the choice of lenses. The Sony 28-70mm is a very mediocre kit lens. The Sony 70-300mm lens is another mediocre lens. Unfortunately, I own it and really don't like it.

The best starter lens you can get is the Sony 24-70mm GM Mark II. It is pricey. I started out with the Sony 24-105mm, and it still is my workhorse lens. The Sony 20-70mm and the Sigma 24-70mm also would be good all-purpose starter lenses.

I travel with the Sony 24-105mm and the Sony 100-400mm GM lenses. The two really cover my needs.
Go to
May 18, 2023 11:18:55   #
As far as I know, there isn't a 28-300mm lens for the Sony E-mount. Sony makes a 24-240mm, but it is a mediocre. lens. Tamron makes an 28-200mm lens.

Having said that, you just bought perhaps the finest camera for photography in the market. Any zoom lens with a larger than 4x magnification will not do it justice. There are plenty of great lenses to pick from, but superzooms don't come to mind here.

PS: I agree that the B&H web site would be a great place to start your research. They sell pretty much any lens in the market. Their web site gives you all the specs. Once you identified lenses that might work for you search online for reviews.
Go to
May 3, 2023 14:02:54   #
Photolady2014 wrote:
I am looking really hard at an Osprey. I won't go over 30" long. I have in the past added bubble wrap to fill the bag if I don't totally fill it! My bag I liked that died, they don't make it anymore, was a bit bigger than needed and just add bubble wrap. The bubble wrap was nice when I did bring home a couple gifts, plus the extra space!


I think that you should go by volume; don't go over 90 or 95 liters. Bags in that size category are usually between 26 and 29 inches tall, so it won't be over 30 inches. Getting a bag that is larger than what you need is not a great idea. You will have to deal with an oversize bag when you travel, and you will carry extra dead weight as larger bags are heavier.
Go to
May 3, 2023 10:35:43   #
I will second Osprey duffel bags. My partner travels with one and is happy with it. I personally travel with a very similar Eagle Creek Warrior model that is no longer made. I use it on my long distance trips between my home bases in Austin and Nairobi as well as to trips to Europe.

Here are some hints when you look for a model:
1) Don't go larger than 90 or 95 liters. A full bag of that size comes in right at 23 kg / 50 lbs, which is the weight limit in international travel. (Smaller airlines in Africa may have different limits).
2) The quality of the wheels is key. Stay away from the four-wheel models with turning wheels. They may be convenient on a smooth airport floor but not in the field. They also break much more easily. A quality bag has recessed wheels that are relatively large and have solid rubber "tires."
3) Stay away from cheap bags. They generally don't last. The bags we use are in the $300+ category.
Go to
May 1, 2023 11:00:11   #
JimGray wrote:
Thanks. We are also going to Flam. We are also taking the ferry to Kirkenes.


Great--another great train ride. I took the ferry to Gudvangen and took the bus back to Flam. Enjoy your trip!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zug55/albums/72157635189170998
Go to
Apr 30, 2023 20:50:41   #
JimGray wrote:
Thanks for sharing the photos of the Oslo to Bergen train ride. We are doing that trip in August.


That train ride is scenic, all eight hours of it. I stopped at Myrdal and took another scenic train to Flam where I stayed for a couple of days. I took a ferry ride on the fjord. You will enjoy this trip.
Go to
Apr 29, 2023 21:33:32   #
I have taken plenty of pictures out of trains and buses. I always get a high percentage of worthless shots, but I also have taken some great shots. Here is an album from a train ride from Oslo to Bergen, Norway, one of the most scenic trains I have been on. Most of them were taken out of a running train.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/zug55/albums/72157634904368192

Here are some hints.
(1) Sit on the shady side of the train if you can. If the sun is shining through the window it is hard to get a good shot.
(2) Get as close to the glass as you can. Make sure the window is clean at the spot where you plan to take pictures. Often you get reflections from within the train, particularly if the lights are on in the train. I often use my hands to keep the inside light from producing a reflection.
(3) Shorten the exposure speed as much as you can to reduce motion blur by jacking up the ISO settings and opening up aperture. In a high-speed train it may be hard to avoid motion blur. As others have pointed out, the windows may be tinted.
(4) Take wide angle shots. You will need to straighten and crop many images, so having extra room is helpful.

Also keep in mind that most train rides are not particularly scenic. It may be worthwhile to research to rail lines you plan to travel on to learn where the great photographic spots are. So I would not plan the entire train ride around getting one or two shots. Relax and enjoy your trip!
Go to
Apr 26, 2023 13:12:53   #
Wallen wrote:
Same reason why the 7x binocular is preferred for marine/boat use over the 8x and higher models.
Higher magnification makes shake more pronounced. Longer lenses benefits from a stabilizing tool.



Sometimes answers are this simple. Now let's see how many pages of irrelevant information will be added to this thread.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 53 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.