Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: architect
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 34 next>>
Apr 4, 2014 10:59:32   #
Mark7829 wrote:
As others have stated, there is a relationship between ISO, Shutter and Aperture. The more auto you use, you are letting the camera make choices and often make bad decisions. The fact that you are getting better pictures in auto is likely because you don't understand the relationship, triangle of ISO/Shutter/Aperture. This understanding will vault you from ordinary to extraordinary.

The reason why anyone comes into these forums is to improve on their work. Learn to shoot in all modes and avoid auto for the best possible work, work you will proudly share, print and frame.
As others have stated, there is a relationship bet... (show quote)
I certainly agree that the understanding of the exposure triangle will improve one's work. What I do not understand from your position and those of many of the others who do not appreciate the benefits of auto ISO, which allows for the ideal combination of aperture and shutter speed, the two creative controls, for any type of subject. Auto ISO will select the lowest and least noisy ISO given the desired creative controls of aperture and shutter speed, as others like Sharpshooter have noted.
Go to
Apr 2, 2014 13:36:58   #
Swamp Gator wrote:
There may be few situations but there are some.
I'll give you an example. Some time back I was shooting a small group of birds in bright lighting and I wanted the entire group in focus. I selected aperture priority and f16 and as an experiment I also choose auto ISO.

The camera selected a high shutter speed (which I didn't need)
And it also selected an ISO of 1600 to get me those settings (which I certainly didn't need)

And for anyone that is knowledgeable enough to select the proper shutter speed and lens opening depending on the lighting and subject mater, they also should be able to competently select an appropriate ISO.
There may be few situations but there are some. br... (show quote)

Of course I am competent enough to select the appropriate ISO. Your example is strange though. When you select auto ISO, you also select a minimum shutter speed. You must have had a fast minimum shutter speed selected without knowing it. Auto ISO is a very useful tool once one learns how to use it. And as sensors have less and less noise at high ISOs, it will even more valuable.
Go to
Apr 2, 2014 09:55:13   #
Swamp Gator wrote:
Don't trust your camera to pick the proper ISO for you. Cameras can be all over the place with it, for instance choosing ISO 1600 in bright light which you would never select yourself.

I can think of few situations where a camera would select ISO 1600 in bright light. Except a manual setting of F-32 and 1/400 sec, as might be selected for an insect macro. Auto ISO allows the photographer to select the desired aperture AND shutter speed for a particular subject, while getting the proper exposure.
Go to
Apr 2, 2014 09:40:59   #
Of the three components of correct exposure, aperture, shutter speed and ISO setting, the first two are for creative control. Aperture for depth of field and shutter speed for freezing/ blurring movement. Anyone who has ever shot with Kodachrome film will recognize the limitations that ISO (25 and 64 for Kodachrome) had on creative settings. So the ability to have flexibility in ISO settings is a big advantage.

I will set my Nikon D90 on ISO 200 whenever I know lighting, natural or supplementary, will be sufficient or if I am using a tripod. But for all other conditions I set my camera on Auto ISO with a max of 1600 and minimum shutter speed of 1/60 sec or so. That allows me to set my aperture and shutter speed to suit the subject.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 23:07:33   #
Photographer Jim wrote:
Not necessarily. Napa, Sonoma, Anderson Valley, Alexander Valley, and Dry Creek area are all pretty wonderful, and very good for photos. As is Lake County to the northeast. The biggest problem is heavy tourist traffic (more so in Napa and Sonoma) that time of year.

If you are interested in wine country photos, and because you will be spending time in Yosemite, you might consider driving over to the Amador County and Placer County wineries. Some very lovely wineries set in the Sierra foothills. Good wines and much lighter crowds.

The thing to keep in mind is that there is a wealth of great places to see in NorCal, but distances can make trying to squeeze too much in a reality. You don't want to spend the majority of your trip driving and not taking photos. Remember, Google Maps is your friend!
Not necessarily. Napa, Sonoma, Anderson Valley, A... (show quote)

So true. I am also familiar with the wine country in the Sierra foothills. Truth is, there is far too much of photographic interest in northern California for just one trip, or even one lifetime.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 20:45:59   #
LaurenT wrote:
Oh My, I looked at your pixoto site, and your architectural background is obvious in your eye, and composition. You take beautiful pictures. Hopefully, someday, I will be able to learn some of that, as I am not a natural. Keep posting your pictures, they are a real treat to see.


Thanks Lauren. I joined this thread because of my knowledge of photo ops in northern California, which I was glad to share, but I am glad to hear about my other photos being appreciated.

Another book that would be of interest to anyone visiting northern California would be "The Photographer's Guide to the California Coast" by Douglas Steakley.

Weston Beach, Point Lobos at Sunset

Go to
Apr 1, 2014 20:05:36   #
Aaron Braganza wrote:
Yes, I second that - your photos are crisp, clear and sharp.
Do you have a website, where you post and share your photos.
Do share your website, if you do, I would like to see more
Thanks
Aaron
Thanks Aaron. I do not have a website, but I do have photos posted on Pixoto.
http://www.pixoto.com/architect/recent

and Flickr.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/architect41/

While I have many photos of California, I also have lots from the Caribbean and the southeast US where I now live.
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 22:43:35   #
Zaydewise wrote:
Funny - I live in Nashville and really love this area. I'm originally from Philly.

If you can overlook the crowding, traffic and high cost of living, California has lots to offer. It helps being wealthy though. That is partly why I left California (I am not wealthy), but mostly because I met a woman from Tennessee.
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 19:51:06   #
LaurenT wrote:
What beautiful pictures you have. I've lived in Contra Costa County all my life, except for the last 8 months here in AK, and I've never seen the beauty represented as well as your shots.

Thanks again Lauren. I miss California in some ways. Especially the geographic diversity. I now live in Chattanooga, Tennessee and enjoy the Smokies as well as cruises to the Caribbean.
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 17:16:01   #
Selkii wrote:
Of course, you could spend weeks in the San Francisco Bay Area alone and never run out of possibilities. I take visitors up into the hills above Oakland/Berkeley for the spectacular views and the easy walks through the redwoods.


This is where I lived for 30 plus years. Attached are shots for the Oakland hills above where I lived. I explored all of the East Bay Regional Parks.

And thanks for the compliment :D

East Bay hills from Sibley Volcanic Preserve




Mount Diablo from Sibley Volcanic Preserve

Go to
Mar 30, 2014 13:09:23   #
I spent over 60 years of my life in northern California. You have named the key ones to visit. I prefer the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe, around Sand Harbor. Consider adding San Francisco, Point Lobos near Carmel and Big Sur if you have time.

Lake Tahoe, Nevada Side


California Wine Country near Healdsburg


Point Lobos State Park


Golden Gate Bridge

Go to
Mar 25, 2014 08:10:49   #
Whatever... Just sayin'...
Go to
Mar 22, 2014 11:31:30   #
Great fall color there. Sunsets from the Clingman's Dome area and the Cades Cove area are not to be missed.

Laurel Creek on road to Cades Cove


Sunset from Clingman's Dome parking lot


Cades Cove

Go to
Mar 19, 2014 08:57:38   #
You forgot "Take my wife... Please!"
Go to
Mar 16, 2014 20:08:49   #
am·a·teur
1.a person who engages in a study, sport, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons. Compare professional.

Many of us here on UHH are highly educated in photography, but who do not earn money from their efforts, but do it for pleasure. If you are compiling scores, I have already said I am a #2. I am highly educated, earn a small amount of money, and engage in photography for pleasure.

Sorry for violating your request not to comment.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 34 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.