Posts for: Badgertale
Jun 1, 2022 20:52:53 #
BebuLamar wrote:
How does one show picture of a raw image?
Interesting question. One develops a raw file and then "sets" the RAW file into whichever medium one prefers to "show" the development in, such as: jpg, tif, gif, bmp, pdf, PSD, etc, using whichever viewer one wants on whichever medium one wishes others to view. One might do it one way or one might do it another. It is one's choice.
Jun 1, 2022 20:05:16 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The Day 2 crowd are always to blame ...
LOL...
Jun 1, 2022 20:04:22 #
srt101fan wrote:
How right you are. Generalizations about photography and photographers without specifying the type of photography seriously impede communication on this forum.
How right you are. Generalizations about photography and photographers without specifying the type of photography seriously impede communication on this forum.Jun 1, 2022 20:03:06 #
All of the responses have been great...probably the most congenial post I've read in a long time. Thanks, all! Funny, pithy, and enjoyable.
Jun 1, 2022 20:01:49 #
Jun 1, 2022 19:59:39 #
Jun 1, 2022 15:19:29 #
You are right...my bad. I replied to the wrong one... Sorry CHG!
Jun 1, 2022 15:05:29 #
robertjerl wrote:
Trolls need love and caring friends too. img src="... (show quote)
Billygoat Gruff will have someone to work on, then. LOL.
Jun 1, 2022 15:04:50 #
rmalarz wrote:
I'll address the, "Who cares what an unprocessed RAW file looks like???" portion of your post. The RAW data converted, without adjustments, to an image can be used for instructional purposes.
The portion of your post regarding "when one becomes a RAW photographer" is spot on.
--Bob
The portion of your post regarding "when one becomes a RAW photographer" is spot on.
--Bob
Great comment...I never thought of it like that... I guess I am a RAW photographer! Nothin' wrong with that. Thanks!!
Jun 1, 2022 15:02:59 #
rmalarz wrote:
Robert, thank you very much. This was taken after a year of experimentation with applying The Zone System to digital photography, along with a few other camera-setting experiments.
Additionally, I was fortunate that summer to be provided with ample weather patterns to take advantage of the new techniques.
--Bob
Additionally, I was fortunate that summer to be provided with ample weather patterns to take advantage of the new techniques.
--Bob
It has been so long since I have even attempted the zoning system. I think I'll make that a project in the next few weekends. Can you send me a few photos of your work over private chat. I don't want to take away from the RAW/JPG discussion...LOL!
Jun 1, 2022 14:39:25 #
User ID wrote:
No angry tone here. UHH is good entertainment.
You presenting this material as NOT an invitation to you-know-what is really hilarious, and I thank you for that, and for the next dozen pages of demented "discussion" yet to come.
You presenting this material as NOT an invitation to you-know-what is really hilarious, and I thank you for that, and for the next dozen pages of demented "discussion" yet to come.
Bwahahahaha!
Jun 1, 2022 14:36:17 #
rmalarz wrote:
You've been on this site since 2015. How many times have you seen the RAW vs JPG topic produce endless pages of the same tripe?
--Bob
--Bob
True. I wonder if we could keep the tripe to a minimum for once. And keep it civil. I hope so b/c flipping through endless pages of tripe to get to the creative process does get tiresome.
I have gone through several conversations and taken out good, critical, technical, and creative suggestions from the forums and placed then in a file I can refer to without the venom from a few Hoggers. I hope UHH could do the same and place them in a "Best Practices" section of the UHH Forum for reference.
Jun 1, 2022 14:27:11 #
I want to be clear about one thing: If you shoot jpg most/all of the time, GREAT! Remember, YOU ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHER. I know a professional photographer who has never shot RAW. His photos are fantastic! He works hard to get it correct in camera and uses minimal adjustment in developing software to perfect his vision. HE SHOOTS JPG. There, I said it, Jerod! Lol.
Jun 1, 2022 14:19:43 #
Ysarex wrote:
Very very very old article with lots of bad misinformation, but it does have pictures.
Not definitive, to be sure. Would you mind delving into one area in the article that isn't so cut and dry? Just as a matter of correction. :0)
Jun 1, 2022 14:16:10 #
rmalarz wrote:
I agree with JD, here we go again.
Please, keep in mind this article was written 2 years ago. Secondly, these authors are paid to write. Quantity is probably more important than quality, even if their offerings are somewhat factual.
--Bob
Please, keep in mind this article was written 2 years ago. Secondly, these authors are paid to write. Quantity is probably more important than quality, even if their offerings are somewhat factual.
--Bob
Thank you, Bob. Things to keep in mind for the beginner and just about everyone, too. Much appreciated.