Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: adamsg
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 44 next>>
Mar 21, 2020 22:51:05   #
Doc Barry wrote:
FWIW, Luminar doesn't open the RAW files produced by my RX100 VII but does the Nikon RAW files from my old D3 and current D810 and D7000. Skylum said they were working of solving this difficulty. I haven't tried opening the Sony file using 4.2.


That is interesting information. I am going to double check with our camera store, as well as e-mailing the question to the Skylum team. Perhaps the owner just wasn't that familiar with Luminar.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 22:45:19   #
gessman wrote:
When did we arrive at a point that only certain parts of a scene have to be included in a picture and everyone has to learn what those parts are and when to include them and when not to? Who gets to determine precisely what has to be in a picture and what doesn't have to be and where can I find that list? I know that you aren't supposed to cut people's ears or part of their heads off and that if you're shooting a landscape you want to leave enough room for some cut lines but beyond that, where are the rules written? I can't count the numbers of books I've read on composition and it kinda seems to be up to the shooter after a certain few things are covered, is it not???
When did we arrive at a point that only certain pa... (show quote)


I got a lot of guidance from David Muench's "The Art of Seeing". Perhaps I was just not gifted with a natural sense of composition, which some are. The book, available as an e-book, really taught me to pre-visualize, avoid cluttered frame edges, using leading lines and a lot more. It is a book I highly recommend.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 18:07:47   #
rcarol wrote:
I apologize I did not make myself very clear. I was really referring to Topaz more so than luminari.


Okay, I understand.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 18:04:53   #
rcarol wrote:
And as I’ve stated in a previous post it is not a RAW processor.


I don't use Luminar as a RAW processor. Instead, following advice from a very good local camera store, I open my RAW files with Nikon's proprietary software, convert to tif and then use Luminar. The store owner - a very knowledgable photographer, himself, said that proprietary information in the RAW files from my D7100 would be lost opening the files in Luminar. This work flow seems to be very effective for me.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:51:40   #
jlf1938 wrote:
That statement is incorrect in my opinion. For me, Sony is my first choice and Canon second. Nikon is my last choice.


I am glad you like your Sony!! For me, I can't argue because I have used only Nikon cameras for over 50 years - starting with a Nikormat FTN. Enjoy your Sony and take lots of pictures. It's a free country.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:22:29   #
Arch3r51 wrote:
Dynamics of Hunt Club changed, not compatible with new members. Born in Texas staying in Texas for the future.


What a beautiful and evocative photograph. And, the deeper meaning adds poignance to the picture. I may well live in Texas near my kids in the future.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:09:23   #
Seven and eight are both fine shots and I can't pick one over the other. Congratulations!
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:04:58   #
burkphoto wrote:
Rolling on the floor laughing!


Wow!! And we thought we had problems with Corona virus - now Adobe???
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:02:58   #
UTMike wrote:
I notice throughout the posts on UHH references to using Topaz and Luminar. Are these "one or the other" plug- ins? If so, what are your thoughts/reasons for preferring one over the other?


Luminar may be used as a plug-in, or stand-alone program. I use Luminar 2018 as a stand alone and really like the program. I also have Luminar 3 on my Mac, but like 2018 better.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 17:00:00   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The only limit to our successful tomorrow is the mirror in our camera today.


That is the kind of statement that ignites these hissy fit exchanges. I own Nikon - but I don't slam Sony or any other maker used by other photographers. I know what I like and what works for me and everyone else is free to do and use as they wish. If you don't like mirrors in cameras, fine. Who gives a darn?
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 16:53:14   #
CamB wrote:
A way of looking at 'Fill the Frame' that no one has talked about in four pages of comments is something I teach all the time. Filling the frame for me means making sure I only include what is important and helps tell the story or completes the composition and at the same time making sure nothing extra sneaks in. As to specific cropping, how do you know all the uses you might find for your shot in the future? Example: 11x14 prints sell at the Gallery. People know that's a standard size and they can get a frame for it. So I make those. But for myself, I like 11x17, so that's how I crop the same picture for me. If it's going into a show to be shown on a 72" or other large monitor you are dealing with a 16x9 format-wide but skinny top to bottom. I like to be able to fill that TV frame. I don't like big black edges, so I try to leave enough room for that. I sell note cards, both horizontal and vertical. Those are strictly 5x7. Yet another crop. One photo file, multiple crops and uses.
Some here have said to get it right in the camera, but right can change depending on use. Also, I take about 11,000 pictures of whales doing various things, every summer. Much of what they do happens unexpectedly, fast and often behind you. If I can just get that Breech sharp, reasonably exposed and in any part of my frame, I can crop it later to make the picture I wish I had.
...Cam
A way of looking at 'Fill the Frame' that no one h... (show quote)


Your cropped photo is just really nice. Even though you cropped the original, you retained enough of the space within which the whales live, the sea AND the mountainous coast, to offer something more fulfilling and informative. Bravo!
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 16:49:32   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Once again I see misinformation about 'filling the frame'.

For some 'filling the frame' means user the sensor to its fullest in order to use every pixel.

It does not work that way. Regardless of what your end purpose it every capture needs some tweaking (sorry SOCC guys and gals). Tweaking maybe minor (rotating slightly) if you just post on the WEB. This rotation creates a crop so you lose some of your 'precious' pixels.

More often than not you need to crop to a set size that will force cropping. If you have 'filled the sensor' that will to cropping part of your image ans basically destroy it.

Whenever you shoot anything think of the end result you want, not filling your damned sensor. This means your composition must respect the end result and take into account the cropping (and rotating) you will need.

We had a case recently where printing involved such cropping and destroyed the capture. The op has likely learned something.

PP solution.... Post processing is not about correcting such mistake (or any other for that matter) PP is made to enhance a capture, nothing else unless you enter 'interpretative photography processing' that includes compositing and the like.
Once again I see misinformation about 'filling the... (show quote)


I agree 100%. In addition, at least in wildlife photography, context - the space within which the animal lives helps understand the subject more fully.
Go to
Mar 21, 2020 10:28:04   #
Welcome to UHH!! So far, here in Idaho, we are not being ordered to "shelter in place". Stores are open, but the restaurant/bar business has absolutely tanked. You might want to get some good reading on photography with E-books. David Muench's book "The Art of Seeing" is excellent if you are into landscape and Steve Perry has good publications at www.backcountrygallery.com, especially if you use Nikon cameras, but also just very good for all photographers.

Stay safe and in good health!!
Go to
Mar 19, 2020 16:48:40   #
GO FOR IT!!!!!!:)
Go to
Mar 19, 2020 14:42:59   #
I totally agree. Here is Southeast Idaho, living in a small city, I can drive 5 miles and be in the foothills, with plenty to photograph, both landscape and wildlife. The season of "In-between" is here, but shortly, there will be plenty to see. It is better for my frame of mind, when not working, to be outdoors with a camera. Fortunately, there is plenty around here to keep me interested. For folks stuck in cities I feel sadness. It must be really frustrating to be threatened with in-house confinement. If I were in that position, I would do a heck of a lot of post-processing and scanning:)

Wishes for good health to all Hedgehogs!!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 44 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.