Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: NormanHarley
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 80 next>>
Dec 23, 2015 11:07:53   #
I went to the Nikon downloads and installed these last night. They are in one download and they uninstall previous versions as part of the download. NX-i is a little faster than NX-2 and has a much improved viewing screen, I am pleased so far! Haven't played much with NX-D yet, but I will as soon as I have time.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 11:40:49   #
I stopped using monitors several years ago because I need to use my reading glasses for close viewing. I hate those glasses, always losing them or they need to be cleaned. One of my computers is hooked to a 32" Vizio tv and the other computer is on a 40" Samsung. No more glasses to wear now while being on the computer. I keep the screens about 4 or 5 feet from me and they look great! If the colors aren't perfect that is ok for my needs. They look good enough and no one has ever mentioned anything about them being off. For my 'expensive' 40" Samsung, I paid about $280 from Amazon.
Go to
Dec 22, 2015 09:54:02   #
Our grand kids are staying with me for a few days while the kids save some money on day care. My 4 year old grand daughter loves 'kissy rabbit' and we all got kisses from her. Now it's time for me to get out of the Attic.. Merry Christmas to all of the Attic People. :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 21, 2015 12:46:50   #
SharpShooter wrote:
Norman, sometimes even "I" can be warm and fuzzy, but not often!!!
I've been visited by admin on several occasions! And always to get yelled at!!! Actually, admin has never yelled, but has a very warped sense of humor!!! :lol: :lol:
SS


SharpShooter, you are too damned happy to be a troll! I think of you more of our resident George Carlin :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 21, 2015 12:26:21   #
I almost jumped once. Took a nice vacation away from this site and came back because it is still one of the most informative, experienced sites out there. I have even grown fond of some of the trolls! :thumbup: And I have no idea who the admins are, I think they only show up to cash the ad checks.
Go to
Dec 20, 2015 09:03:57   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Thank you.


You're welcome, Jerry. I quietly follow lots of the links that you post. They have helped a lot! :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 20, 2015 09:01:46   #
SBW wrote:
:thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Not out of context at all. Maybe you should look up the meaning. Rude? Nope. Judgmental? Nope. Just pointing out his hypocrisy.

Don't like it? Then don't read it. No one is forcing you to.

BTW, learn to spell.


Thank you for pointing out my spelling error. Yes, I did spell judgmental wrong. I am far from perfect but my people seem to love me anyway. This is the first time I have encountered you, thank you for the advice on one more to add to my list of 'people worth ignoring'. . And have a wonderful life with your keyboard. ;-)
Go to
Dec 20, 2015 07:47:32   #
SBW wrote:
That is really interesting and I might add hypocritical advice coming from someone, you, that frequently post in the Attic.


What a rude, out of context and judgemental comment. Jerry has always been one of the more positive and helpful members of this forum who daily adds to our group. I can see why you are in hiding, SBW... :thumbdown:
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 13:22:07   #
Why? Because I am hyper and have a driving need to create.
What do I do with my photos? I share them with family and friends. It's great when their eyes light up.
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 08:32:48   #
burkphoto wrote:
Pixels are in files. Dots are made by printers. One pixel may be printed with many dots.


:thumbup: Thank you, and I'm sure I will be scratching my head as I read more articles relating to this. I never knew how much there was to learn about printers and files. I think I need to pull the trigger and get some hands on experience with a real printer.
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 08:26:33   #
redhogbill wrote:
inches x dpi =pixels

pixels divided dpi= inches

Thanks! Now I am even more confused! I need to study up on dots versus pixels. Getting there slowly.. I probably just need more coffee. :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 18, 2015 08:23:40   #
burkphoto wrote:
I'm not fond of such calculators. They're often too stringent in insisting on the same number of pixels for a very large and a very small print.

Assuming well corrected close vision, the human eye can resolve around 240 input pixels per inch from an 8x10 print held 13 inches away. But it can only resolve 120 PPI from a 16x20 held 26 inches away, or 60 PPI from a 32x40 at 52 inches... Conversely, we can see MORE than 240 pixels in a 4x5 if we hold it around 8 inches away, assuming we can focus our eyes that closely.

So the formula should have some reference to normal viewing distance... BUT, where this breaks down is *subject-matter dependency*. If you intend to make a print with tons of fine details in it — say, a group of 450 graduating seniors at a high school — then your file should have 240 to 250 pixels per inch in it. The print will be scrutinized at very close distances, as the viewer attempts to recognize individuals in the image.

Ideally, we evaluate the subject matter, the viewing distance, and the print size, and come up with a compromise that works for the application.

Personally, I use 300 PPI for 4x5, 4x6, and 5x7 prints, 250 PPI for 8x10 to 12x18 prints, 200 PPI for 16x20 to 24x36 prints, and 150 PPI for 30x40 to 40x60 prints. This is fine for MOST subject matter, with the caveat mentioned earlier about close viewing.

I generally use Photoshop's crop tool to enter a size and PPI value, and let the software do the calculation for me as I crop the image with fixed proportions... For very large prints, I'll have a lab friend use his dedicated resizing tool (Perfect Resize).
I'm not fond of such calculators. They're often to... (show quote)


Thank you, Bill. I am still learning about PPI and dots and resizing files. I may buy a better printer in the future, still deciding if it is better to have the lab do it or to invest in one for my home. All of this information is slowly absorbing into this old brain, which will help a lot if and when I get a good printer. This photography hobby just keeps getting more involved as I move forward. Loving the ride! :thumbup:
Go to
Dec 17, 2015 20:37:54   #
quixdraw wrote:
This suggestion is pretty boring -- I had been using the Canon utility that came with the Canon PP 100 to print, and it was a pain to get 13x19 from FF -- lots of waste & cutting. The other day I printed 7 images for gifts direct from NX View 2 and they were right the first time -- a minimal border all around for the frame. Nothing missing from the image that I cared about (to crop to the format / paper) and EASY!

Bill, you beat me to it! Hi, Norm!


Hi Quixdraw! I am all for easy. :thumbup: Taking pictures is fun, editing can turn into a chore sometimes.
Go to
Dec 17, 2015 20:34:03   #
Bill_de wrote:
View NX is very basic, but does offer 8x10 in the drop down where you select crop.

The better news is that Nikon now provides a "Free", more advanced, downloadable software solution. Capture NX-D lets you choose any size crop, so you can match it to the size you want.

http://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/products/162/Capture_NX-D.html


I just looked and found that, thank you! Too bad they don't have 11 x 14 in there.
And yes, I need to move into a better editing program some day. But so far, for what I do, View NX2 has been doing a good job and I am very used to it... maybe stuck in a rut is a better term. ;)
Go to
Dec 17, 2015 20:28:55   #
Gene51 wrote:
http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/printing/resolution/1_which_resolution_print_size_viewing_distance.htm

Norman, I use this with excellent results.


Thank you, Gene, I just bookmarked it. :thumbup: And it's great to see you back!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 80 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.