flyboy61 wrote:
Well, Thomas, I may have stepped in it again! I had the Nikon 24-85 3.5-4.5, non-vr version which I used on my D 7100. I noticed it was not really sharp during a shoot at my Granddaughter's wedding.
At 82, I figured the lack of VR was the culprit...although I was using a shutter speed above the minimum for the lens. I have bought a Nikon 24-120 f/4 with VR, hoping it will give a bit more steadiness to the endeavour.
I should have it next week, and we will see.
The Sigma seems like a fantastic lens, and reports of much better build quality than earlier may make it a goood choice, if the Nikon doesn't work out.
Well, Thomas, I may have stepped in it again! I ha... (
show quote)
Thomas is right...the Sigma is a superior lens...my go to on my D7xxx when I had them and then my D500. I preferred this setup to my 24-120 on full frame camera when I had it. Perhaps I didn't do enough homework but I listed my copy for $275. Apparently a sweet deal as it is in a 9+ condition. I am original owner, have box etc. Kim