Posts for: JD750
Apr 6, 2024 14:39:46 #
Bill_de wrote:
It wasn't my quote so I included the source.Link is probably on the way.
---
---But it was the quote, not the book, that I was hoping people would grock.
It looks like UserID got it.
Apr 6, 2024 14:37:38 #
rjsurrette wrote:
What does this mean? If you are in the path of totality the moon will fully cover the sun. If you are not in the path of totality it will not fully cover the sun. It will take however long it takes to get to full totality, 45 - 60 min or so. .I hope the moon fills in quickly so it fully covers the sun during the eclipse.
.
.
You can check here to see if you are in the path of totality.
https://www.exploratorium.edu/eclipse/2024-total-solar-eclipse-guide
Apr 6, 2024 14:32:13 #
billnikon wrote:
Thank you for sharing your experience.I use them all the time. Very good prices, very nice results. Can't beat there prices.
I frame 4X6 prints and 5X7 prints, my clients are very happy with the results.
I have not noticed fading, but most of my prints are less than 5 years old.
So, maybe after 20 years, who knows, I will not be around, that's for sure.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
I frame 4X6 prints and 5X7 prints, my clients are very happy with the results.
I have not noticed fading, but most of my prints are less than 5 years old.
So, maybe after 20 years, who knows, I will not be around, that's for sure.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
Apr 6, 2024 14:31:49 #
burkphoto wrote:
Darn it too late to change the title. Do you mean Walmart? Yes.
Thank you for the detailed reply!
Apr 6, 2024 14:30:10 #
genocolo wrote:
No I a not nuts, but you are rude. Both in your original reply and in this one. Don't bother replying, I will not continuing a conversation with someone who demonstrates such immature childish behavior. I am blocking you.Are you nuts? What a stupid remark.
Apr 6, 2024 14:27:11 #
selmslie wrote:
You can certainly say that for yourself but you should not try to extrapolate that to everyone else.Most of us seldom deal with images where the white balance is critical. <snip>
Apr 6, 2024 12:24:12 #
genocolo wrote:
Sour grapes here?Sorry, but I don’t see anything in these very ordinary photos which would tempt me or justify a $6,000 price. No disrespect intended to you personally.
Apr 6, 2024 12:22:50 #
soxfan941 wrote:
If you dont get answers here you might want to consider reposting the question in the UHH Post Processing Category. 47, I'm guessing there must 10's if not (maybe) 100' of On1 photo raw users here. Am I the only user that has run across this problem? Hard to believe.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-116-1.html
Apr 6, 2024 12:18:11 #
billnikon wrote:
Sometimes you gotta break the "rules". Let the results speak for themselves. That is a nice pic. Serious Attitude. I like it. :)I try to compose in the camera, if not, I can do that easily in post.
I have the rule of thirds lines on my viewfinder, so I will notice those while shooting.
But as a wildlife photographer, I try to center my subjects, especially if they are moving.
I find centering my subjects sometimes work best.
composition is a personal thing.
but when using post I am sometimes watchful of the rules.
I have the rule of thirds lines on my viewfinder, so I will notice those while shooting.
But as a wildlife photographer, I try to center my subjects, especially if they are moving.
I find centering my subjects sometimes work best.
composition is a personal thing.
but when using post I am sometimes watchful of the rules.
Apr 6, 2024 12:15:24 #
Craigdca wrote:
Or get the hose out. LOL.So looking straight down the length of it, similar to a shot of a road straight down the middle from the middle of the road. Plus greater DOF. I can try it next time it rains.
Apr 6, 2024 11:55:04 #
srt101fan wrote:
In whose world. It was a complete misunderstanding. It wasn't until he clarified it that he got the answer to the question he was asking.If you look at the original post (https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-803711-1.html#14545850 ) and the responses to that post you'll see there was no misunderstanding. I don't think terminology was an issue.
Apr 6, 2024 11:53:21 #
Delderby wrote:
He is not asking about printers.In the past few years I have been disappointed nay disgusted with most makes of printers, where their only quality is in wasting the inks that they sell you at hugely inflated prices. Exception - I use a Canon Pixma 3 in1 which serves me well. BUT I have read reports from other Hogs which would disagree - and so I did not respond to your request.
Apr 6, 2024 11:47:47 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Right on both points!Immaterial in that it can easily be changed with raw, but you should at least have a good idea what light color you’re dealing with for accuracy in editing. I don’t think the designers at a fashion show wouldn’t want you just making your own decisions about how their colors should look.
Apr 6, 2024 11:43:16 #
Moments come in and out of our lives like fireflies glowing for the briefest of time on a dark night before disappearing into the black.
Source: The Camera Doesn’t Matter - Sean Gallagher
Source: The Camera Doesn’t Matter - Sean Gallagher
Apr 5, 2024 21:11:24 #
burkphoto wrote:
Talk to the lighting director and learn the native white light color temperature. White balance for that. Let the filtered color fall where it may. That will more accurately capture the color the lighting designer wants the audience to see.
