Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: terry44
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 213 next>>
Jan 23, 2018 12:36:27   #
I have the B700 it is a nice camera I do not use the SnapBridge app had a hard time getting it to work guess they have put out a newer version it may have fixed things other than that it is a great camera shoots raw (nrw format) and jpeg.
Barbara D wrote:
Hello photographer friends! I am purchasing a new camera to take on my trip to Africa in a couple of months.

I am looking for a point and shoot bridge camera. I don't want to have to deal with trying to change lenses and keeping sensors clean while riding in dusty conditions. Bringing 2 camera bodies (one with short lens the other with long) is out of the question.

I have a top dollar range of around $750. So far, the Nikon Coolpix B700 to be in the lead of cameras I've looked at. My husband has one and likes it. He is not as heavily into photography as I am, and I was wondering if someone might suggest a better choice for me.

Here is the link for the B700, if any of you care to take a look:

https://www.bestbuy.com/…/nikon-coolpix-b700-20-…/4997101.p…

Thanks for any words of wisdom you hay have to offer!
Hello photographer friends! I am purchasing a new ... (show quote)


Go to
Jan 23, 2018 12:24:15   #
A vote for the free Topaz Studio it will do everything you want and more. here is a link https://web.topazlabs.com/downloads/
2337 wrote:
I need help in finding a good, simple photo editing program. I have had to buy a new computer with Windows 10 and my old programs will not work on it. I loved the simplicity of the old Olympus "Camedia" program which I used for years. The free program that comes with Windows 10 is not as good as the 7 was and will not add text or be flexible in the printing.

I need to "adjust" light, color, sharpen, crop & rotate, add text, and rename. I need to be able to print 12 or 20 to a page with the names on each photo.

I've tried Adobe "Lightroom". You can not add text with it and it is a monthly charge - not free or one time purchase.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
I need help in finding a good, simple photo editin... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 23, 2018 12:08:40   #
Ira wrote:
You can go to Google Images and upload your photo and it will search the internet to see where the image shows up.
It's a great way to make sure that no one is using your images wthout your permission.

https://images.google.com


Go to
Jan 20, 2018 14:25:30   #
aww come on your better than this to address your question no, the lcd is part of the camera therefore it cannot happen cell pones are pretty large and though the camera is a part of the whole you have to include it all so a cell phone is larger than a point and shoot just not a thick.
BebuLamar wrote:
People keep wanting smaller cameras yet larger LCD so is there a time when the LCD is larger than the camera?
Go to
Jan 20, 2018 14:19:23   #
Don't know about hackers but there is a lot of great new features in the cc 2018 version, I was a holdout but finally gave in and am happy with it but I do a lot of editing if you do not edit so much there are many other programs out there that do a great job and do not break the bank.
RAK wrote:
I was looking for info on a new computer and stated that I have a boxed and licensed copy of CS6 that I wanted to install on new machine. “Don’t want to pay monthly fee”. It was brought up that Adobe does not support this product any longer and that I would run the risk of hackers zeroing in on this program, I don’t understand. Does my Norten Security not protect me?
Go to
Jan 20, 2018 14:13:15   #
bet they could be a problem.
Peterff wrote:
But watch out for trained eagles or other raptors!


Go to
Jan 20, 2018 14:12:25   #
luckily sold it before it even went on the market now sorting our stuff in the new home which finally closed last week.
BeaverNewby wrote:
According to the current regulations for commercial use, the fees and testing required make it almost impossible for the average person to legally take the pictures you want. It might be cheaper to hire someone to take the pictures.


Go to
Jan 18, 2018 15:43:42   #
Thankfully yes and so did my drivers but many close calls, sure glad I am retired its nice not to have to deal with all that stuff anymore.
Stephan G wrote:
I hope you were able to avoid them all!
Go to
Jan 18, 2018 15:03:13   #
Having driven semis across the US and lower Canada I have seen much of this here as well.
jerryc41 wrote:
This is an amazing collection of ridiculous car crashes in Russia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJD8w-iglJI


Go to
Jan 18, 2018 14:56:31   #
Steve_m wrote:
Marriage and Marijuana

In Canada, our government, in its eternal wisdom, recently passed two laws.

They are:

1. Legalized gay marriage

2. Legalized marijuana

Legalizing gay marriage and marijuana at the same time now makes perfect Biblical sense.

Leviticus 20:13 says: "If a man lies with another man they should be stoned.” Apparently we just hadn't interpreted it correctly before!


Go to
Jan 17, 2018 18:39:55   #
bobbyjohn wrote:
DAMN CHECKING ACCOUNT

A crusty old man walks into a bank and says to the woman at the window, “I want to open a damn checking account.”

The astonished woman replies, “I beg your pardon, sir. I must have misunderstood you. What did you say?”

“Listen up, damn it. I said I want to open a damn checking account now!”

“I'm very sorry sir, but that kind of language is not tolerated in this bank.”

The teller leaves the window and goes over to the bank manager to inform him of her situation. The manager agrees that the teller does not have to listen to that foul language.

They both return to the window and the manager asks the old geezer, “Sir, what seems to be the problem here?”

“There is no damn problem.” the man says. “I just won $200 million bucks in the damn lottery and I want to put my damn money in this damn bank.”

“I see,” says the manager, “and is this bitch giving you a hard time?”
DAMN CHECKING ACCOUNT br br A crusty old man walk... (show quote)


Go to
Jan 16, 2018 17:33:42   #
thats what I said the difference is we let the camera software decide I sure like doing my own adjustments so that it comes out as what I saw when I took the shot.
jackm1943 wrote:
Your jpeg has been manipulated also, just in-camera as the photographer has the camera set up.


Go to
Jan 16, 2018 13:54:34   #
If a photographer shoots a raw image instead of a jpeg which I believe most pros do, it is not the true scene that you raw when putting together and shooting the scene it has to have some work done to it to get the colors,light,and elements to come out just as you saw them, the same happens in camera when shooting jpeg in camera. If you add or alter the image by adding taking out things then it is not the true image. I was a graphic artist and printer for 26 years, before the image went to press we always did at the very least dodging and burning to get the image as close to the true object or scene as possible, when digital editing came about this topic also surfaced as far as I am concerned simple editing is not a misrepresentation but a true representation of the true image only when the image is manipulated to create a false or exaggerated image is it a touched up image. and that image should be marketed as such.
Indiana wrote:
As a follow-up to yesterdays thread "Photography & Reality" here is an interesting development from a major retailer that doesn't surprise me...and in fact, I was surprised that someone had not done it yet.

"CVS Health plans to announce Monday (1/15/2018) that it will ban manipulation in its store brand makeup marketing and promotional displays amid growing awareness of the harmful nature of touched-up images."
"...the decision reflects an acknowledgement that 'unrealistic body images' are a significant driver of health issues, 'especially among women.' "We're all consuming massive amounts of media everyday and we're not necessarily looking at imagery that is real and true," To try to hold ourselves up to be like those women is Impossible because even those women don't look like how they appear in those photographs" The retailer will place an icon with a "digitally modified" warning on any marketing materials that don't comply by 2020*

On my comments on "Photograpy & Reality" earlier yesterday I suggested that the icon's OCC (out of camera) and PP (post processing) be used on photo's to acknowledge to the viewer what they are looking at...original camera/lens shot, or photo with post processing (manipulation). This article by USA TODAY seems to suggest an awareness of misrepresentation by presenting a photo as reality, when in fact, it has been manipulated without acknowledgement, which in fact, supports my earlier position on representation/misrepresentation on the prior thread. I have been surprised that a challenge to the "truth in advertising" clause has not been applied and enforced on the visual media by consumer and product (visual) users. Interesting development. Please respond and please stay on topic!

* see USA TODAY by Nathan Bomey posted 1/15/2018.
As a follow-up to yesterdays thread "Photogra... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 10, 2018 15:36:53   #
I recommend that you just go enjoy the show and buy some photos from vendors many have a roving photographer.
Which island are you heading to?.
dsmeltz wrote:
Part of the trip will involve a luau. So bright light from the torches and fast action. Not sure about being allowed to use flash. Currently thinking of using a 70-200 2.8 on my 80D. Possibly shooting between 1/300 and 1/700 at f2.8 to f.5.6. Possibly pushing as high as 6400 ISO (or higher.)

Any suggestions?
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 21:22:18   #
I have 2 of these they are great cameras fun to work with.
Beowulf wrote:
I also have a near pristine Nikon FA film camera with a Nikon 35-70 f3.5-4.5 manual focus zoom lens. The lens, which I picked up recently, operates smoothly and appears to be fungus free and shows very little dust. The lens come with caps. Along with the camera, body cap, comfort strap, and user manual, there is also an original Nikon FA ever ready case, which are somewhat rare and often expensive if bought on eBay, etc. Personally, I have never used any ever ready case, as I found them cumbersome.

This FA shows very little wear as you can see in the pics. It has the honeycomb shutter curtain that was highly touted in the camera heyday. It was also the first Nikon to use matrix metering. The interior is clean, as is the battery compartment. I will ship it with two L44 batteries installed that probably have a decent life left to them. The meter seems to be right on the mark.

About a month ago, I shot a roll of color film with it and had it processed at a local Walgreens. All prints were sharp, well exposed, and showed no light leakage at all. I do not offer any camera for sale that I have not tested with film beforehand.

Outfit Price: $145 with $10 shipping via USPS priority mail to CONUS only. I will accept PayPal, money order or check. The latter two must clear prior to shipping. I will offer a 7 day return period if not satisfied, and the outfit is returned in the same condition as when sold.

PM me if interested.

I have sold cameras and flashes on the Hog previously with no complaints. I have a 100% feedback rating on eBay with 137 sales as marcman66.
I also have a near pristine Nikon FA film camera w... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 213 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.