Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Jackdoor
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 63 next>>
Oct 22, 2016 13:14:27   #
Great work as always Jim. But I've some bad news. She's a GIRL. You can kind-of tell by the expression in the third shot. (Female Goldeneye. Does that make her a Bond girl?)
Go to
Oct 22, 2016 06:36:42   #
Linda Sue wrote:
Hi All,

I'm looking into purchasing a new camera, my first Nikon and was thinking about a D3400. I would like input on this particular camera, good and bad.

Thanks!


The D3400 appears to be a fine camera, but for a beginner to DSLRs I think the saving on getting a D3300, especially refurbished, makes much more sense. The kit 18-55mm lens is surprisingly good, and with the saving you've made, you're halfway to getting the perfectly adequate 55-200mm. That should keep most newcomers happy for at least a few months!
Go to
Oct 21, 2016 14:39:13   #
dwe823 wrote:
Is it worth moving to mirrorless full frame cameras versus the existing 4/3 and other formats that continue to improve?


Other things being equal, and they generally are, a larger sensor has four main advantages over a smaller one: Increased resolution; increased dynamic range; better low light performance; shallower depth of field when required. The last two are particularly noticeable, especially when comparing micro4/3 with full frame, and are an immutable part of the physics involved. It's worth studying the studio comparisons on DPreview to see the effects of the first three factors.

However, another immutable part of the physics involved is that the micro4/3 lenses are half the size, often half the price for equivalent quality, and are about a quarter the weight! And the Olympus in-body stabilisation is amazing.

As ever, you pays yer money and takes yer choice...
Go to
Oct 21, 2016 06:53:30   #
Howard5252 wrote:
For those who have never taken a balloon ride ... take-off is interesting as the "Pilot" tries not to hit anything near the takeoff zone. The flight is very peaceful as you glide silently over the terrain and get an entirely new view of everything. AND THEN ... the command "Brace for landing!" Let me explain the obvious - IF there is no wind at the landing zone, you will gently descend and maybe get a bump upon touching the ground. ON THE OTHER HAND ... if there is a wind at the landing site, it's an entirely different story. We landed at about 12 mph. The first collision was with an 8' termite mound - we took that out as we flew by. It did slow us and the "Pilot" took full advantage of the collision by immediately dropping us to the ground. Three BUMPS later we came to a stop and literally rolled out of the gondola. As they say ... "Anything you can walk away from..."
Yes, we did have a champagne breakfast after "Landing".
For those who have never taken a balloon ride ... ... (show quote)


Lovely stuff.

As you say, in early aviator speak, anything you can walk away from is a good landing. If the aircraft can be used again, it was a great one!
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 14:12:58   #
Howard5252 wrote:
Our guide explained that the big cats don't seem to see us (people) as food, as
long as we stay in the jeep. They just ignore us as if we weren't there, or as in the case
of the Cheetah, they use the top of the jeep as a vantage point to survey
the territory. For those who have not seen this video - watch it !! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uwB6K5XvQg
We did have a small incident while observing a Cheetah one morning; the jeep would not
start. We called in to the base camp and another jeep was soon on its way. When it arrived
we were about 30 yards from the Cheetah and the second jeep pulled in front of us so that
a rope could be attached from it to our jeep. All we really needed was a tug/ pop the clutch/
and we'd be back in business. Our guide got out of our jeep on the side away from the Cheetah.
He was going to simply do a quick wrap of the rope around the front of our jeep. The moment
he got out of the jeep, the Cheetah's head swiveled around to look at us. The Cheetah had seen
our guides feet!! We mentioned this to our guide and I have never seen such a quick "Wrap the rope/
jump back into the jeep" as I did that day. Nothing escapes the notice of these animals.
Our guide explained that the big cats don't seem t... (show quote)


Thanks. I was having a gentle joke, but a great story to go with a great picture.
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 07:27:51   #
Same this side of the hills- I gather trees decide when autumn arrives partly on day length, and partly on growing conditions. This year has been excellent for them, so they try to keep growing for longer. It's a bit of a risk- an autumn storm can bring down a tree in full leaf.
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 07:21:31   #
Howard5252 wrote:
Every animal knows the safe distance between themselves and a Cheetah.


Including the photographer?
Go to
Oct 17, 2016 15:56:12   #
selmslie wrote:
At 1/15,000 for the flash and 50 wing beats per second it's closer to 1/300th.

The wing does not move at a constant speed. If you catch it near the top or bottom of its stroke it will be nearly stopped.

So some images may have a little blur and others virtually none. Which ones do you think will get posted?


Unfortunately, as I know to my cost, birds' wings are very flexible- not all bits are stationary at the same time, though I'd guess a hummingbird wing is proportionately less bendy than a larger bird. Either way, I agree that 1/15,000 is plenty fast enough!
Go to
Oct 17, 2016 15:38:09   #
selmslie wrote:
I think that's exactly what I said. For the flash to dominate the ambient exposure must be minimized, relatively dark.

To stop a hummingbird's wings the duration of the flash must be a fairly small fraction of the cycle of the wing beat. Do you know what that is? I would have to look it up but I would guess it's nowhere close to 1,000 beats per second.

PS: I just looked it up and it's less than 80 beats per second. A flash or shutter duration of 1/1000 should easily stop the movement.

A bee flaps about 200 times per second. That would call for a shorter exposure.
I think that's exactly what I said. For the flash ... (show quote)


Not as simple as that. Using these figures, the shutter would be open for about 1/12th of the bird's wing beat- that's plenty of blur. It's about speed of movement, so distance matters as much as time.
Go to
Oct 11, 2016 12:19:21   #
burkphoto wrote:
Decent choice for travel. Yes, Panasonic seems to have a decent handle on their menu structure! I have their GH4, which is THE most ergonomically sound camera I have ever used, and I've used lots of Nikons and Canons (and Bronicas, Mamiyas, Yashicas, Rolleis, Hasselblads... plus Beattie and Camerz long roll beasts) over the years.

The Micro 4/3 system is extensive and mature. This body will mount over 80 different native lenses from Panasonic, Leica, Olympus, Samyang, Voigtlander, and others. The good news here is that lenses are 1/3 to 1/4 the size, bulk, and weight of their equivalent full frame field of view counterparts.

Your camera also can be adapted to many dSLR and SLR lenses and cine lenses. With both Olympus and Panasonic continuing to release new and highly advanced cameras in this category, you know you will be able to leverage any lens investment in the future.
Decent choice for travel. Yes, Panasonic seems to ... (show quote)


Agreed- I think Micro 4/3 is the future unless you really NEED that extra 15% in dynamic range or pixels.
Go to
Oct 1, 2016 16:59:17   #
Great work as always, Angler. The nuthatch is absolutely stunning.
Go to
Sep 30, 2016 17:08:42   #
tbohon wrote:
From the 'supporter' comment I'd guessed it was an English football reference but just couldn't put 2 and 2 together without getting 9.

Thanks ... and let me know if you need anything smuggled to you during your hiding ... ;)

Tom


Go to
Sep 30, 2016 11:33:35   #
tbohon wrote:
Not if you let us in on the story it won't ...


OK, Nottingham Forest is an English Football (soccer to you guys) club. The rest is really not worth knowing unless you're an ardent fan. And I think there's only 13 of those, 11 of whom are the WAGs! Hopefully Graham isn't one of the other two.

I'll have to go into hiding now...
Go to
Sep 30, 2016 03:55:42   #
Graham Thirkill wrote:
Nah! he was Nottingham Forest supporter........

Cheers and Beers
Graham/098\




That's going to confuse our overseas mates!
Go to
Sep 29, 2016 17:55:27   #
lateron wrote:
Nice one Graham!!!!!!! I've never been to Kirklees (despite living in 'Spitting' distance) Bolton Abbey, Riveaulx Abbey and Selby Abbey - yes, but never to Kirklees!!!!!


Just up the road from me too!

I knew the previous owner, and have been in the gatehouse. Local rumour says Robin Hood shot an arrow from his deathbed, through the large upstairs window at the nearer end of the building, and asked to be buried on the spot where it landed. Seems likely somebody did that, but was it the Sherwood 'Robin Hood'?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 63 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.