Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: randomeyes
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 71 next>>
Apr 10, 2017 00:40:24   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Raw Versus JPG
jenny wrote:
* * * * *
That's entirely right. RAW is raw, and if it is raw, it is still RAW, and that IS a fact.
Don't ever try to mess with my facts little boy.




No, you are wrong. It is raw, as in raw data. RAW would be an acronym, like Rear Axle Weight, or Reconnaissance Attack Wing, or Rifleman's Assault Weapon. Get the picture. I know newbies can sometimes get confused. Your lack of photographic knowledge is readily apparent the more you try to dispense advice to people who do KNOW what they are talking about. Read a few books on the subject, then get back to us. This crap you are dispensing is laughable!!
Go to
Apr 9, 2017 22:19:41   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Raw Versus JPG
jenny wrote:
* * * * *
Junk is data that is irrelevant, useless, that has nothing to do with processing a file for a photograph, and
would only prevent the photographer from his/her intent to produce a file = to, or superior than, a JPEG.
It includes information that varies from one mfr. to another and includes codes they wish to protect from
their competition. This "junk"to you, essential to them, is the sort of data that is removed by the mfr. when
presenting to you the option to shoot a JPEG file. That is, it is pre-processing.
After all, you didn't really think the co. that sold you your camera would delete anything that would
cause them to, "shoot themselves in the foot", by removing data that you need. But that seems to be the
view that many champions of RAW have come to believe because necessary data, and junk data, was
never explained to them. Just believe,... your Nikon and your Canon people really are in competition, right?
* * * * * br Junk is data that is irrelevant, usel... (show quote)





It's raw, not RAW. You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. Less Talk, more photos!! Let's see what you got!!
Go to
Apr 9, 2017 18:37:01   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Raw Versus JPG
dsturr wrote:
Unlikely you'll ever come across a learning curve as flat as this one. After nearly 6 years even the formatting and punctuation remains the same.

"felt forced to digital,slide film unavailable,etc.etc.,wanted
to email pictures,a question was posted today re. backgrounds...this would have been so very easy with film
and double exposure. Photoshop is a mystery,help me
join your newer technology". - Jenny (Sep 28, 2011 16:31:51)






Sometimes 6 years can be an eternity.
Go to
Apr 6, 2017 10:49:14   #
(For Your Consideration)
Flight
AzPicLady wrote:
This is so cool.


Thank you.
Go to
Apr 6, 2017 10:48:32   #
(For Your Consideration)
Flight
NJFrank wrote:
I am enjoying the view from behind the bird. As if I am part of the flock flying in their customary V pattern. Adding the plane to the shot to me adds to the overall feel of the picture. Furthermore the plane and birds can coexist.


Thanks.
Go to
Apr 6, 2017 10:48:01   #
(For Your Consideration)
Flight
rook2c4 wrote:
Nicely done.
The direction of the sunlight falling on the bird and plane doesn't quite match. But this discrepancy isn't too obvious, as the plane is fairly small within the composition.


Thanks.
Go to
Apr 5, 2017 17:21:04   #
(For Your Consideration)
Flight
Yes it is a composite.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 1, 2017 21:15:23   #
(For Your Consideration)
A Daunting Catch
minniev wrote:
Thanks for the proof. I will work on it. Do you think the patch tool is the best way to start?





I would use the Content Aware tool, in small doses. You will find some blurry patches of water that you can then clone in later.
Go to
Apr 1, 2017 20:32:29   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
April 2017 - Monthly Masters' Series - Landscape Photo Of The Year - Do You Agree?
minniev wrote:
This Monthly Master's discussion will center on the Best Image winner of the 2016 International Landscape Photographer of the Year contest. We invite you to check out the winning image and click over to FYC if you want see the other finalists and/or join in the discussion about this image, photography competitions and judging. We'd be particularly interested in hearing from you if you've entered or judged competitions yourself.
This Monthly Master's discussion will center on th... (show quote)




Yes, love it. Very ethereal and mystic.
Go to
Apr 1, 2017 20:30:10   #
(For Your Consideration)
A Daunting Catch
minniev wrote:
for both me and Mr. Blue Heron. There was no way to shoot him without getting the green shrubs along the shore. I had to climb up on a picnic table at the edge of a pier to do this much with him. Your thoughts on the image, please, and the OOF shrubs, on cropping and/or repairing (it is already cropped some). I watched his battle with this big catfish for an hour. The heron speared the fish, beat him on the ground, buried him in the sand, clawed him, and when I left, had still not figured out quite how to get him down the gullet, but was working on a dismemberment approach.
for both me and Mr. Blue Heron. There was no way t... (show quote)






Contrary to what some people on here say, this is three minutes using the Content Aware tool in PS CC. A bit more time on it and it would be better. Just saying that it can be done.


Go to
Mar 31, 2017 10:13:28   #
(For Your Consideration)
Beating the storm
Dave Chinn wrote:
Excellent !!! Capturing the boater exiting the frame is an indication to me that his time is about up before all hell breaks loose. Nice capture, I like everything about it.
Dave


Thanks Dave.
Go to
Mar 29, 2017 17:28:37   #
(For Your Consideration)
Beating the storm
AzPicLady wrote:
This is quite lovely. In view of the story here, having the boat leaving the image is appropriate. I really like how small are the man and boat compared to the scene.




Thanks.
Go to
Mar 29, 2017 17:27:32   #
(For Your Consideration)
Beating the storm
ebrunner wrote:
I would probably like this image without the boat. The boat does add a lot to the "story" of a guy trying to get off the water before the storm envelopes him. I don't care at all that he is "moving out of the frame". That is the whole point. He is trying to get to a safe area. Well done.
Erich




Thanks Erich.
Go to
Mar 28, 2017 17:59:28   #
(For Your Consideration)
Beating the storm
Linda From Maine wrote:
Love it! The placement of the horizon line to emphasize the sky, the tiny man vs. nature, his being close to the edge of the frame implying he's almost out of danger




He did make it. Pulled in his boat and ran for shelter (trees).
Go to
Mar 28, 2017 16:48:26   #
(For Your Consideration)
Beating the storm
rmalarz wrote:
Good catch.
--Bob




Thanks, fortunately I was in my van!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 71 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.