Posts: The Aardvark Is Ready

215 pounds?

srg wrote:

There's probably only one percent that could remember 5 words like that. Are you a one percenter?

Huh?

Oct 2, 2023 18:13:09 #

Senator Diane Feinstein RIP

ArtzDarkroom wrote:

He never did explain ChiCom.

I guess I am unfamiliar with the News Station that claims its audience is composed of cousin fu*kers. Imagine that.

Well, those cousin fu*kers are apparently smarter than the child fu*kers and butthole surfers who watch MSM. LOL Only an isolated not too bright person doesn't know what ChiCom means. Can you guess it before I have to spell it out for you?

Oct 2, 2023 12:23:47 #

Senator Diane Feinstein RIP

Blaster34 wrote:

Swalwell sleeping with a Chicom spy, I'm sure his wife was thrilled...FBI reported Dianne Feinstein has had a ChiCom spy on her staff for 20 years as her driver...Now you know

The truly sad thing is cause he only watches CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the MSM, that he actually did not know those facts.

Oct 1, 2023 16:50:38 #

215 pounds?

Racmanaz wrote:

On a side note, did you notice that these same Lefties "demanded" that Trump take a cognitive test but they refuse to call for Biden to take one? I wonder why that is?

Here's why.

Oct 1, 2023 09:53:00 #

215 pounds?

RixPix wrote:

Go on weigh the other one

You're right at home. Talking about feces.

Sep 30, 2023 23:36:28 #

I**********nist Democrat Jamaal Bowman To Be jailed With 1*6 Prisoners

Wait. What? Sorry about that. Never gonna happen.
POS also tore emergency exit signs off the doors.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jamaal-bowman-fire-alarm-house-v**e-government-shut

Sep 30, 2023 20:53:06 #

Home appliance crackdown by executive order

LOL. Going by the level of your discourse, the only books you read are comic books.

Sep 29, 2023 16:27:22 #

Senator Diane Feinstein RIP

ArtzDarkroom wrote:

At 90 she died in office. She was one of California's finest senators. Her legacy is one of bipartisan compromise.

Gavin Newsom has the opportunity to fill her seat with somebody for a year or so.

https://babylonbee.com/news/senator-feinstein-death-not-expected-to-affect-re-e******n-campaign
https://www.infowars.com/posts/senate-changes-rules-so-dianne-feinstein-can-stay-in-office-while-dead/

Sep 28, 2023 14:42:32 #

Triple G wrote:

The full document. My apologies; I opened one year to see if the data was there and copied that url instead of the home page.

https://harvardlawreview.org/supreme-court-statistics/

No problem. Will look at it.

Sep 28, 2023 14:14:17 #

Triple G wrote:

It's just a primary source for those who may want to do independent study. That's it.

I could do an independent study of it until the sun turns into a burned out cinder and it's not going to answer the question. It's only the 2004 SC.

Sep 28, 2023 14:01:03 #

What are "Molten Iron Nanospheres" and how do they relate to 9-11

srg wrote:

As discussed by an Architect. The buildings were built with Steel. Where did the "Iron" particle avalanche come from as described by survivor witnesses. Iron has not been used in the construction of high rise buildings for a very long time.

https://youtu.be/xWi0x9xigQM

Sep 28, 2023 13:48:33 #

Triple G wrote:

In case someone wants to check.

https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/vol127_statistics.pdf

For us non lawyers, can you break it down and explain where it shows the answer to the question at hand? It would be nice so we don't have to wade through every row and column trying to find what we're looking for. And how does a breakdown of the 2004 SC decisions show a history of the court since it's inception?

Sep 28, 2023 11:52:38 #

thom w wrote:

5 to 4 isn't a split decision?

Yes you are correct. My bad in wording my answer. I was trying to counter the use of the word to somehow besmearch or invalidate the decision as a "split" one. Aren't the vast majority of SCOTUS decisions split?

Sep 27, 2023 21:56:35 #

Racmanaz wrote:

"I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell ... (show quote)

Damn you, don't you know it's different when they do it? /s

Sep 27, 2023 21:55:25 #

National Park wrote:

I’m not rewriting history. Gore prevailed in the ... (show quote)

In your response you didn't disprove a single thing I said. Seven justices ruled that Gore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Do you not understand the concept of illegal. If it's unconstitutional it's ILLEGAL 5-4 on another part of the case. Hardly a "split" decision as you like to call it.
Ergo, Gore tried to "find" v**es and overturn the e******n by illegal means.
As for the rest of your statements as I said none of those actions by Trump has been declared illegal in a court of law. Did Trump hole up in the WH and refuse to leave? Did that happen and we're unaware of it? As I said he tried all the legal means available to challenge the e******n. If some are ruled illegal in the future then so be it.
Oh and I wanted to ask, is the natural default position of liberals such as yourself to respond with snarky or insulting comments?
I don't like kool aid. I prefer a nice bourbon or scotch.