Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Revet
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 77 next>>
Feb 10, 2016 07:27:46   #
:thumbup: :thumbup: Nice!!
Go to
Feb 6, 2016 11:47:54   #
TomV wrote:
The red-dot places a laser-sharp cross-hair in the center of the viewing glass. You line up your eyeball relative to that, keeping it centered. You can see the cross-hair from a foot behind the camera. This allows your face to be away from the camera, using both eyes to see the entire target area. You are essentially using your camera like a machine gun.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 6, 2016 11:04:29   #
TomV wrote:
There are several readers asking how this works. I use the same setup the OP has shown in his last photo. The camera is connected to a lens that is mounted to a gimbal head via its tripod bracket. I have a 400mm and 600mm that I can use this with. The U bracket is mounted to the bottom of the camera and the red-dot to the top of the bracket. The bracket is adjustable in the vertical direction.
At the shooting site, after things are assembled, you fine tune the red-dot to match the center of the viewfinder. You can now sit back from the camera and use the red-dot to pinpoint the camera to the target while both eyes are viewing the scenery. A great setup for BIF when using the gimbal.
There are several readers asking how this works. I... (show quote)

Got it, thank you. What kind of image do you see. I dont get how you can sit back. I havent used a rifle scope in a long time but the ones I used you had to have your eye in it like a viewfinder.
Go to
Feb 6, 2016 07:08:51   #
ptcanon3ti wrote:
Can someone explain how this actually works?

How does the rifle scope see what the lens sees?
how is focus actually acquired?
where do your eyes actually look?


I agree, This looks very interesting but I would like the same questions answered. I don't understand what the scope is different than the viewfinder.
Go to
Feb 6, 2016 07:02:23   #
I got mine last fall, you will love this lens!! Very fun to use.
Go to
Feb 5, 2016 07:54:26   #
NoSocks wrote:
The way I deal with this is I never hand my camera to others.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 4, 2016 18:37:16   #
windshoppe wrote:
Yeah, I guess the BBF function works differently on various camera models.


It would be a nice feature to remove on automatic. If Canon does that, nice touch indeed! Not selling my Nikon though!
Go to
Feb 4, 2016 15:35:42   #
windshoppe wrote:
Very true. I just slide the dial over to the little green box when asking someone to shoot. Works well most of the time.


BBF remains in effect in auto mode on my D7100; thus I set up U2 for "normal" focus (green box) when handing it to others.
Go to
Feb 4, 2016 07:27:34   #
I have been using BBF for 2 years on AF-C autofocus mode. It took a week or so to fully get the hang of it but once you get used to it, you will never go back.

The ONLY problem with BBF is when you hand your camera to someone else. They just will not get it. You can quickly teach someone to use manual mode when you want to jump into a shot, but teaching someone BBF on the fly just doesn't work. I have U2 set on my D7100 for shutter release focus just for that purpose.
Go to
Feb 3, 2016 08:07:52   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Anyone using this? Trying to configure it to use with my d7100

Thanks


I got this for a D7100 and it works fine. If you follow the instructions in the manual, the set up is easy; otherwise it is not self explanatory. I exclusively shoot RAW so I don't use it much (Too slow for RAW files). I actually bought it more so that I could remotely trigger the camera using a tablet and it does a good job doing that.
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 07:37:25   #
Wingpilot wrote:
I couldn't find anything regarding this, so I thought I'd ask here. I have thousands of color prints dating back to the 1960's. Like a lot of folks, I took lots of shots, hoping to get one that came out good. And like lots of folks, I kept all of them, many of which, no doubt aren't really worth keeping. My wife has suggested that we go through these pictures, keep the ones we want (for the memories) and toss the rest. My question is, what is the best and most efficient way to do that? Can I use the scanning feature on my printer to scan them into the computer or are there programs or other devices that do this? This is going to be a gigantic project. Thanks in advance. And please, no "you should google it and not bother us" responses. Just looking for some good advice here.
I couldn't find anything regarding this, so I thou... (show quote)


I had your same problem 2 years ago. Someone on Nikonites told me about a program called Autosplitter. I downloaded it and tried it out. It is fantastic. You can scan as many photos as you can fit on your scanner and split them into individual pictures with this program. It is easy and fast. It made the monumental task much much more manageable. It is a paid program but it is cheap and well worth it. You can download it and try it out at no cost.
http://autosplitter.com/
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 07:30:13   #
Spent a couple minutes looking and found nothing. Decided you were showing this as a form of abstract art in nature. Now I can't look at it without seeing that cat looking into my soul!!!!
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 07:26:10   #
I guess this explains why when I took my Digital camera into a dark closet and tried to push the ISO it didn't work!!!!!!!
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 07:10:21   #
Macronaut wrote:
I never did get it figured out so, I just put the Optimzation Pro on my laptop, which should actually workout better because I can take it with me to make adjustments instead of running in and out of the house. ;)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Jan 29, 2016 14:13:06   #
RKL349 wrote:
Huh? I thought th OP was talking about the sigma 150-500mm lens!


Woops, my mistake. I read it 150-600 which is the lens I have. Not enough coffee this morming!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 77 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.