These are beautiful, strong images. I want to live in the boat house. Thanks for posting.
Good pictures, great reminder. Thank you JohnnyG.
Doe wrote:
Great photos!
What kind of bird is that in the last photo? The legs just don't seem to go with the body! LOL
Coot....I think. Great photos Shane T.
Wonderful shots thanks for posting.
Thank you Phyllis and Pat.
Swamp Gator wrote:
It's always a thrill seeing one of these magnificent birds in the wild isn't it?!
Cool shots
Yes, it is a thrill. And when you know you have eye contact you can't help but wonder what he/she is seeing...you know it is a whole lot more than our visual capabilities. Thanks for your comments, Gator, I have great respect for your work.
rocco_7155 wrote:
Amazing captures rockdog.
I'm glad it only took you a lifetime to get them! :thumbup:
Its why I love photographers.
Its reminds me of being a kid and buying every pack of baseball cards you could scrounge a nickel for just hoping for that Mickey Mantle. You never thought about giving up!
Thank you rocco. You are so right, much in life seems to boil down to persistence.
a couple of hasty crops
Bmac wrote:
Fantastic photos, love the curve of his beak.
Thank you, yes it is a beak that can make a living for him!
The Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex serves over half of the migratory waterfowl that travel the Pacific Flyway, literally tens of thousands of ducks and geese. These wetlands are also the home of many other birds including upland game, song birds and raptors. There are over 60,000 acres accessible by road. Visitors are required to stay in their vehicles over much of the complex but this is not a problem. The viewing and photography access is well served by gravel roads and cars actually make excellent blinds. I have visited this refuge every year of my adult life and never been disappointed. But this year was exceptional. I was treated to a Bald Eagle who tolerated my making over a dozen exposures. He was well aware of my presence (and, I think, his own photographic magnificence). I shot these through the open sun roof of our car, hand holding my Nikon D5100 with 55-300mm kit lens. These shots might have been a bit sharper if I had remembered to turn the engine off but I got kind of excited. Thanks Mr. Eagle you made my day.
Beautiful work in all aspects, great mix. More please, thanks for postion.
FATCADY indeed...GPS sporting at that. Great shots Ian, you really got the paint.
Just looked at the title of this topic. Typo; meant orthodoxy, fingers still fast, brain...not so much
Mark Bski wrote:
rockdog wrote:
When I was working with film I remember using an adjustable paper holder that allowed me to print images that did not conform to standard print sizes ie 4x6, 5x7, 8x10 etc. I usually did this because the altered format was more consistent with the composition I had in mind a particular image. Often with landscape images, a panaroma-like format (far greater width to height ratio) seemed most pleasing to my eye. I am new to digital photography and a complete novice at post processing, but I have discovered that almost all imagemanaging/editing software makes cropping extremley easy. I would greatly value the thoughts of folks regarding the aesthetic and technical implication and consequences of custom cropping.
Thank you, Phil
When I was working with film I remember using an a... (
show quote)
Rock, Costco prints a 12x36 inch "poster" size, I bet others do as well. I've had this done and it works quite nice. There are also pre-made frames and matting for this size as well. If you could manage to crop your photos to standard sizes you can save yourself a lotta headaches later on. Check out printing and framing sites to see all the combinations.
quote=rockdog When I was working with film I reme... (
show quote)
Thanks Mark, i thought printing and non standard format would be an issue. I have several friend living on Vashon. Beautiful country.
marcomarks wrote:
rockdog wrote:
When I was working with film I remember using an adjustable paper holder that allowed me to print images that did not conform to standard print sizes ie 4x6, 5x7, 8x10 etc. I usually did this because the altered format was more consistent with the composition I had in mind a particular image. Often with landscape images, a panaroma-like format (far greater width to height ratio) seemed most pleasing to my eye. I am new to digital photography and a complete novice at post processing, but I have discovered that almost all imagemanaging/editing software makes cropping extremley easy. I would greatly value the thoughts of folks regarding the aesthetic and technical implication and consequences of custom cropping.
Thank you, Phil
When I was working with film I remember using an a... (
show quote)
I've always enjoyed wide panoramic views like those you posted. If you can get it printed as wide as it needs to be, go for it! Don't worry about frames and mattes because one of your panoramas can fit into a normal frame with a custom matte to fit your custom cropping size.
By the way, some of the new cameras (like my Sony Alpha 55) can do wide format shots and save them as such without having to crop as much as you do with standard "rectangular" format.
Another process you might want to look into, since you are into panoramic, is software that will blend, adjust vertical components to be straight up, and stitch several shots together into an incredibly wide panorama that can be almost 180 degrees wide without fish-eye effect and it doesn't need any cropping at all.
Nice work, by the way...
quote=rockdog When I was working with film I reme... (
show quote)
Thank you for your thoughts marcomarks. I am aware of stitch-together software, but I have so many basic PP processes to try to get a handle on before I even consider processes on that level of sophistication. I appreciate your comments.