Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: smokieblues
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 38 next>>
May 23, 2015 08:01:08   #
R.G. wrote:
Laziest re-edit ever :lol: . Rotated 90 deg. Flying up the diagonal seemed like a good alternative.


Thank you again for your time and help. So many differing takes is making this a hard one to choose.
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:58:40   #
Bob Yankle wrote:
And another one, not necessarily any better than any of the others.

Thank you so very much for taking the time to help me. Love the artistic feel you brought to this. I also really love the crop you decided to do.
Thank you!
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:55:53   #
R.G. wrote:
Lots of good edits to choose from. This is my offering. I left the crop fairly loose so that you could choose your own fit if you chose to use this one.

-


Thank you so very much for taking the time to help me! I love the details you were able to to bring up and keep. I did not realize that this one could clean up so well. THANK YOU!
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:51:59   #
robertjerl wrote:
I'm not one of the experts, just a learner, but I have some good PP software.
Here is a try.


THANK YOU so very much for taking the time to help me out. You may just be a learner but your work on this is sooooo much better than what I could do. I also love your cropping ideas for this as well. Thank you.
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:48:19   #
Rongnongno wrote:
You have several possible solutions here.

a 8*10 means you need to frame the bird correctly within this space, this is strictly a matter of taste.

You could also use a 1:1 crop ratio to get e 8*8 or 10*10. but there again the position of the bird will make or destroy the capture. The rotation of the bird (by 45 degree) will completely change the vision...

In term of colors you also need to be careful. As you can observe you have many options offered already. Your best bet is to give a feedback so that one can follow your idea(s) and produce something you can live with.

Head to the right or to the left, flying over (ordinary)...
Head to the top right, flying away (safe)...
Head to the bottom left, flying toward (a bit threatening)...
You have several possible solutions here. br br a... (show quote)


Thank you so very much for you differing ideas on how to crop this. Since this was not going into a "portfolio" but instead into a personal scrapbook (just so I could check this bird off my birding list) I was not really thinking about differing ways to crop. I do however really like your idea on the second crop. Turning the bird 45 dgs really does change the attitude of the photo!
Thank you very much for ideas and taking the time to respond. Very much appreciated.
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:41:27   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
What an amazing sight you captured! A bit sad, of course, but that is nature at its most real.

My versions:


Thank you Miss Linda! I was very surprised to see this on the download. Thank you so very much for you help. Your render is quite detailed!
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:38:49   #
Rick36203 wrote:
There appears to be a good bit of reds and yellows in the area where exposure was increased. Not sure how much is natural so I did not remove it.


Thank you VERY much for taking the time to help me. You really brought out the details in this. Thank you.
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:36:37   #
ronwande wrote:
Does this help a little? I used the Photoshop or Elements Shadow/highlight control to boost the shadows and then did a little sharpening


Thank you so very much for the help! You can really see the detail in the chick!
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:35:05   #
FrodoBaggins wrote:
Can't help with PP but the shot is very impressive! Hope you get help.


Thank you so much for the wonderful comment!
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:34:37   #
Bultaco wrote:
I took a shot at it, not the best tho the.


Thank you! You can really see the chick in this one. Thanks for taking the time to help.
Go to
May 23, 2015 07:33:49   #
cheineck wrote:
really quick PS fix.


Thank you so very much for taking the time to help. Love the sharpening on this.
Go to
May 21, 2015 22:00:40   #
WOW guys and gals! What a wonderful selection. It's going to be tough to choose between them! Each and every one of them has their own strong points. The differing takes on all of them sure showcase the varying artistic talents here!
Thank you all so much for taking the time and energy to help me with this! Your help and advice are very much appreciated!
I will be back with each of you personally when I get back. Limited on time for the moment but I didn't want you all to think I left.
Thank you again!
Go to
May 21, 2015 12:57:06   #
Tsilva suggested that I post this here. So instead of re-typing it all I'll just post a link.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-309937-1.html
Any help with this would be much appreciated! And as stated in the post I know it is a very bad photo and I'm not looking for NatGeo quality. I'm just looking for something that will look decent in an 8x10 for my scrap book.
Go to
May 21, 2015 12:21:41   #
This is my personal once in a life time photo and I totally screwed it up! I was out photographing some dragonflies and this beauty showed up. I missed his first pass which was low and fast threw the yard. I was scrambling to get the camera reset and praying for a second pass. When he showed up it was almost directly into the sun and up way to high.
I was just hoping to get a decent shot to show that it was a Swallow Tailed Kite and was just happy to get any shots of him. On the down load I noticed that this guy had a bird chick in his talons!
I have access to some photo editing tools but they are really sub-par.
I know that you can't make much out of a cow patty but I was hoping some of you guys would take a few moments and see what you could do to clean this up a little. Any help would be much appreciated.
I just would like a decent 8x10 to go into my scrap book.

Full photo

(Download)

Crop

(Download)
Go to
May 8, 2015 23:40:06   #
birdpix wrote:
My experience with that lens is that IS seems to slow focus acquisition down a little but doesn't seem to affect tracking once it is locked on. You should be using IS selection 2 for panning as that ignores the horizontal motion of the camera and only stabilizes it in the vertical axis. I also tend to shoot at f/8 for the extra DOF and I think that lens is a little sharper there.

At 120mm it appears that the GBH was quite close to you. I say this because it doesn't look like you've cropped at all. At that near distance, the relative motion of the bird in the frame is quite fast and that may have been the biggest factor. There appears to be a slight forward and upward motion of the head, consistent with the natural motion of this bird in flight, that was not frozen by the 1/1600 shutter speed. I regularly shoot at 1/2000 and up and still can see some subject motion. And I am not referring to wing tip blur but rather the same type of motion I see in you shot.

The truth is these are pretty good shots. You've kept them in the frame and It appears that you have focused on the body of the bird which should still give you sufficient DOF to keep the head/eye in focus. Depending on the print size and the viewing distance, these could be quite acceptable shots.

Keep practicing and have fun!
My experience with that lens is that IS seems to s... (show quote)


Yes this bird was quite close and these photos are straight out of the camera.
As dumb as this is going to sound it never dawned on me that the closer the bird the faster the movement therefore needing the faster shutter speed. I have no earthly idea why I didn't think about that.
THANK YOU for reminding me of something I should have remembered. But that is why I asked for help.
I will have to remember this when I go out this weekend.
It has been a very long while since I've been out for BIF's.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 38 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.