Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jackpi
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 49 next>>
Jan 9, 2018 09:45:25   #
tca2267 wrote:
I have just started shooting RAW after years of  shooting onlyJPEG and I am looking for a "good" program to
edit my RAW photos.

I have used ACDee for years for the JPEG editing and really l like it. They have two good RAW programs:
1] ACDee Ultimate 2018
2] ACDee Photo Studio Professional 2018

Does anyone use these or know anything about them?

Any and all information would be greatly appreciated.

I hope you are not limiting your search for information to this site. I recommend going on-line and searching YouTube and with Google for comparisons of photo processing applications and reviews. List the criteria they are evaluating the applications by and decide which criteria are most important to you. Every raw processing program has its pros and cons. Your needs and expectations are critical. Most people have only used one or maybe two post processing programs. Their recommendations may not be consistent with your needs.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 09:27:43   #
nauticalmike wrote:
But since everything is automated once the machinery is set up to produce a particular lens does it really cost that much more to produce? I am just baffled why one lens can cost $5,000 and another may cost $400 when they both take tack sharp photo's, but one just needs a bit more light to do it.

Really? What do you know about lenses and the size-dependent distortions they have that must be corrected? Did you ever wonder why lenses have so many elements and why micro-4/3 lenses are less expensive than full frame lenses? Did you ever attempt to find out why?
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 07:35:40   #
inbigd wrote:
Comparing image quality only, do you think that the A6000 is superior? DXOMark scores the Sony higher, Canon cameras score lower there for some reason. Not sure I believe it.

I'll probably buy one of these, having a difficult time deciding.

Canon knows they are behind:
https://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/time-think-outside-camera-box-canon-chief-argues/
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 06:41:59   #
ChristineMarie wrote:
Hi, my name is Christine and I really like what I've read on your site. I'm a wildlife photographer in South Texas and I shoot on a ranch with hundreds of species of birds.

I have used Lightroom for about 2 years. I would like to learn Photoshop but to what approach would you recommend? Is there a Youtube Video you would recommend? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I go by Chris but that name had been taken.

Photographers don't need to learn all about Photoshop, only about a small subset of photoshop relevant to photographers. While there are many books on Photoshop, if you want a book, look for a book on Photoshop for photographers.

I think you will find great resources for Photographers on YouTube. You can find video series on learning Photoshop in general, and specific videos on selected topics such as noise reduction, spot removal, selection, layers, etc. I find that combining a book plus YouTube is a great way to learn. There is also a Facebook "Photoshop for photographers" group that has suggestions and provides answers to questions.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 06:31:24   #
That1NJGuy wrote:
Hi all. I have been researching on getting a decent camera while on a $1000 budget, totally out the door, not just a body. What I plan on using this for is sports (hockey, ice and field), nature and landscape, theater and lastly portrait. I want this to be a camera to be something we, as a family, can grow with. so not only is the camera is the main focus, so is lens. Some of the models I have been thinking about is the Nikon D5600, Canon EOS 6Ti. I'm not throwing out the Sony's either. The Nikon D7200 might be a reach if is significantly better.

So what say you photographic gurus?
Hi all. I have been researching on getting a dece... (show quote)

Check out camera recommendations on Wirecutter.com:
https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-mirrorless-camera-for-beginners/
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 06:27:27   #
suntouched wrote:
Just a quick share that might be of help to Fuji X-T2 users. I have this camera and love it but I must confess that I was not using this camera to its potential so I purchased a copy of Dan Bailey's book from his blog. I am only about 1/3 through it but it has been so helpful. You all may know this but 3 very helpful functions that I did not know are:

Setting up My Menu- you can put almost any menu item in here and when you go to menu this category comes up first- what a timesaver if you have to go into menus. And it is not difficult to set up. Go under the Set Up menu to start.

"T" on the speed knob on top of the camera- if you set your speed to "T" then you can control your speed from your front or rear dial quickly up to a 15 minute exposure. It eliminates setting the speed on the camera.

Action Shots- It only takes 3 quick steps to set up the focus for birding, sports, etc.

Now I don't want to sound like an advertisement for Dan Bailey but if I don't learn anything else, I feel I got my moneys worth! The book is about 300 pages.
Just a quick share that might be of help to Fuji X... (show quote)

I have that e-book, "X-Series Unlimited." I concur that it is a great book (available as an e-book only). Note that it covers all Fuji X-series cameras--not just the X-T2.
It is reasonably priced, updated every time Fuji updates X-series firmware (updates are free), and available on-line as an e-book at:
http://danbaileyphoto.com/blog/master-your-fujifilm-camera-with-my-x-series-unlimited-ebook/
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 06:15:55   #
inbigd wrote:
Comparing image quality only, do you think that the A6000 is superior? DXOMark scores the Sony higher, Canon cameras score lower there for some reason. Not sure I believe it.

I'll probably buy one of these, having a difficult time deciding.

Sony cameras have superior sensors. Canon lags far behind Sony, Nikon and others in sensor technology.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 06:13:55   #
7D Mk 2.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 11:37:54   #
TriX wrote:
On your monitor, or in a print? If the monitor, what resolution are you at? (If a Windows machine, right click on the desktop and click properties to see the resolution). If you shoot at a 3:2 aspect ratio (which is a default for many cameras) and display full screen on a 16:9 monitor (for example), everything is going to look too wide.

That only makes sense if the computer screen's pixels are 1 7/9 time as wide as they are tall!
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:40:35   #
corw314 wrote:
I finally bought my dream lens but when I went to register it, it say designed in Japan but made in china and I could not find a serial number. Is this a Tamron lens? Did anyone else have this issue? I emailed both the vendor and Tamron to see what they say. Does anyone have this? Is it comparable?

The serial number is on the lens. Hard to read without glasses and good light.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:36:12   #
rjandreoff wrote:
My situation:

I am a Nikon shooter (D4, D 610) and do extended vacation travel overseas. In 2017, that came out to about 5 months in New Zealand, Australia, and Thailand. Weight is an issue, but trying to keep track of too much photo gear moving from location to location every 3-4 days is proving a challenge. It is easy to loose stuff and I have! So, I consider weight vs. gear count of equal importance. About 60-65% of my shots end up falling into #1 50-120 and #2 at/above 300 mm focal lengths. My historical practice has been to take 3 lenses, with a TC. This is not working AND not crazy about TC s anyway. So 2 lenses will be the limit: 1 prime and 1 zoom. My trusty Nikon 24 mm 1.4 G is the prime. We are leaving for 6-8 weeks in Italy in April. So what do you think? Ken Rockwell liked this Sigma, and so do many of bloggers. All input is sincerely appreciated but a YES or a NO, with real world experience on this Sigma would really help. Thanks everyone.
My situation: br br I am a Nikon shooter (D4, D ... (show quote)

Take a 50mm prime as well as the 24mm and consider the Nikon 300mm f/4 PF lens with a 1.4TC. Very light weight. Zoom lenses are lower quality and very heavy.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:27:56   #
Bill_de wrote:
Epson P600 or P800

--

I agree, but only if he prints at least once a week. These are much better printers than the Canon printers that cost half as much, but the print heads need regular exercise (more so than the Canon printers). Note that just printing a 4x6 print every week uses much, much less ink than going through a print head cleaning cycle.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:24:15   #
Dbl00buk wrote:
So, I go and buy a Sony a6000 just to have something small and light to do family snaps. Liking that, the next thing comes to renting an A7ii to go on vacation vs. bringing my D610. Liking that even better, comes to reading and researching Sony and Fuji mirrorless. What put me over the edge was going on a landscape shoot with my friend with my D800 and his using his new Christmas gift, A7Riii. Without making comparisons between my D800 and his Sony, to try and keep this post short, I've acquired severe mirrorless (proverbial jumping-ship) GAS. But, the dilemma lingers. The angel appears on the right shoulder and says, "Be satisfied with what you have!!" The devil on the left is shouting, "Sell everything...GAS, GAS, GAS." I have a lot invested in Nikon gear, and I'm not related to Warren Buffet to just buy (even slowly) into a new system. Anyone have/had this feeling?
So, I go and buy a Sony a6000 just to have somethi... (show quote)

Unless you can clarify for yourself what your "real requirements" are (unless you are printing really big prints [14"x21" or larger, for which you only need 20MP]), you are forever doomed to chasing the next bright shiny object.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:18:11   #
Red Sky At Night wrote:
I newly purchased a D850. I have looked online and have found a list of way too many lenses that are recommended for this camera. I am looking specifically to do two things: 1) photograph my dogs at rest in my great room with somewhat low light (yes, I can use a flash but also have a lot of natural lighting but not vibrant sunshine most of the time). 2) I like to photograph my dogs as they play outside in the yard while I am sitting on my patio watching them. I'm thinking I would need two different lenses. Also, what can you tell me about the Sigma Art 135 lens and would it work for this situation?
I newly purchased a D850. I have looked online an... (show quote)

50mm f/1.8 for indoors and 70-200mm f/4 for outdoors.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 15:15:32   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Nary a plastic mount in the lot....And this was taken about seven years ago. I still have most of them. Sold or gave away some, bought others...

It is clear that you are a collector.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 49 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.