Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Homer60
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22 next>>
Apr 28, 2018 00:22:26   #
Have been looking for Great Horned Owls in an around the forest preserves where I live. Finally found 2 last Saturday the 21st of April. Only was able to capture one with the camera.
Below is some information from Wikepedia on Great Horned Owl, Bubo virginianus virginianus ;
The legs, feet and talons are large and powerful. Tarsal length is 54–80 mm (2.1–3.1 in).[6] The average foot span of a fully spread foot, from talon to talon, is around 20 cm (7.9 in), as compared to 8 cm (3.1 in) in long-eared owls, 13 to 15 cm (5.1 to 5.9 in) in barn owls and 18 cm (7.1 in) in the great grey owl.[4][17] Great horned owls can apply at least 300 pounds per square inch (PSI) of crushing power in their talons, a PSI considerably greater than the human hand is capable of exerting. In some big females, the gripping power of the great horned owl may be comparable to much larger raptor species such as the golden eagle.[18]

Above would be a good reason not to wear rabbit fur hat on ones head when out looking to capture pictures of owls.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Apr 19, 2018 23:50:33   #
Steve Perry wrote:
That may very well be the case - if nothing else, maybe people feel like the technique stuff if more "permanent" and they can learn it later, but they need to know about the new gear right now.

Steve,
I am not one of those who think technique is something one learns later, I purchased your e-book on Wildlife Photography, and my buddy purchased your Nikon Autofocus e-book My first serious SLR was a Nikon N80, which I mainly purchased for a trip to Australia back in 2001. I had the kit lens a 28-105 still have it Also purchased as Sigma 70-300, to get a litlle reach. Neither of which have VR. That trip I shot 70 rolls of 36 exposure film. 200 and 400 ASA. Had 1 filter a CPL. It cost me a bundle to have that film developed when I got home.Some very nice shots some not so good.
Digital was just starting to become popular. On one of our excursions to the great barrior reef, there were photographers on the boat using Digital SLR and video. So the company could sell a video of the day to you when returned to port, and yes I bought one, video I mean. With Digital I could see the results sooner.
Which helps one understand what did not go right with the capture, some motion blur due to poor technique in holding camera. Some out of focus because one moved forward or backward as the shutter was depressed. Some due to over or under exposure. Have purchased the D7000, until I kept seeing pitures with the D7100 and I could not reproduce the IQ with my D7000 so I purchased the D7100 and ran the shutter count up to 149,501and now the mirror hangs so I bought the D500 and I had the Nikon 200-500, I like to shoot birds and local wildlife when I can find it. Composition one learns I think through practice and the ability to accept honest criticism. And spending time analyzing the pictures one took, with an open mind. Do some research on Composition and Art
I have posted some pictures on UHH from time to time, and have been lucky. People have been kind and honest. If they don't particulary like something I try to see it through there critque. The hard part is remembering to try different things when one is out with the camera. I know this is a few weeks late, I am playing catch up in UHH.
Enjoy all your posts Steve. an try to make the best of what I have.

Homer 61

Or Mike
Go to
Mar 28, 2018 14:00:00   #
Dennis48 wrote:
Wow, wish I could have been there. The photos captured some real personality.

Thanks Dennis, was one of those lucky occasions.
Regards,
Mike
Go to
Mar 28, 2018 12:13:56   #
GAGray wrote:
Beautiful pics, thx for sharing!


Welcome to the Hog, thanks for the kind comments.
Mike
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 18:00:56   #
Skiextreme2 wrote:
Very nice, is that a heron?

No the bird is a Sandhill Crane.
You can check it out here.
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Sandhill_Crane/id

Regards,
Mike
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 11:30:58   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Hey speters, thank you for your interest.

First, these images as posted to Flickr, they exhibit the characteristics discussed at this posting about resizing parameters for digital images. Specifically, 2048px on the long-side. I use 100% JPEG quality as defined by the LR Export dialog although I've tested down to 85% with no detectable difference in display quality. A quick glace at the local folder used for uploading shows these image files range from 0.99MB to 2.15MB. Even if I'd attached the files directly, the entire post of full-screen digital images would not exceed the 20MB limit for a post. The original RAW files average around 29MB per image.

But, the images are not attached to UHH at all. At a technical standpoint, this post is no larger than an all-text post. If you click the link "show tags" that displays below the text box when you're authoring a UHH post, the item "URL" is the format of the code used to link an image from Flickr to display on this page. The image isn't "here". Rather, a link is made to another online site in a manner similar to how advertising is displayed on these pages. The actual code is more complex with a merge of URL and IMG links. Thankfully, Flickr dynamically generates these hieroglyphics of code.

From Flickr, I have options to generate both the "linking code" as well as selecting sizes for each image. As 2048px is too large for a display on a monitor that is 1920-pixels wide (without UHH creating scroll bars), I select a slightly smaller size of 1600-pixels for landscape orientation even though the original file was updated at 2048px. For vertical images, I select 1024px.
Hey speters, thank you for your interest. br br F... (show quote)


Paul,
Thank you for sharing your pictures, just fabulous.

And I appreciate the information regarding flicker and your export information from light room. I will be reviewing the link you had inserted.
Regards,
Mike
Go to
Feb 24, 2018 08:11:30   #
Steve,
Beautiful set of Wolves, I like the portrait style of 1 and 2 evokes a sense of family
Thanks for sharing
Mike
Go to
Feb 23, 2018 10:25:03   #
camerapapi wrote:
"Concentrate on technology and your images will be technologically perfect. Concentrate on seeing the nuisances of light and your images will stir the soul"
Jack Dykinga.

Now that is a very profound quote.
:)
Mike
Go to
Feb 23, 2018 06:43:45   #
Rob48 wrote:
This is a great set, Mike; clear and well framed.

Rob,
Thank you for the response and the comment.
Eventually I wll have the courage to post a capture in the critique section.

Regards,
Mike
Go to
Feb 22, 2018 09:55:14   #
DickC wrote:
Great series of some beautiful animals!!


Dick,
Thanks for the response, the wolves are beautiful.
Regards,
Mike
Go to
Feb 16, 2018 07:29:44   #
Brent,
Nice captures, I enjoy what you did with the post processing, gives me some idea of what can be done.
Like the fine detail in #1 what is your new lens?
Regards,
Mike
Go to
Feb 15, 2018 13:27:18   #
So I was kindly informed,
Thanks, goes for knives also
Go to
Feb 15, 2018 06:51:37   #
BrentHarder wrote:
Mike, about those missed opportunity shots where the teeth were bared...........you know what Wayne Gretzky (the famous hockey player) said: You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Of course he was talking about hockey but the same applies to photography!


Brent,
I agree , there is one I heard from Charles Glatzer about Wild Life photgoraphy, "he who has his eye to the viewfinder wins". To be politically correct, it probably should be they who have their eye to the viewfinder wins.
Thanks for the reminder, there is a lot to keep in mind in this world of phiotography.
Mike
Go to
Feb 14, 2018 23:10:41   #
imagemeister wrote:
I love the one with the two together 8-) ...- except the focus should be on the one to the left with the snow on nose - and you clipped his ears .....8-(

This was the capture before the 2. The closer 1 was the one that I focused on. As you can see his head was turned.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 14, 2018 07:29:39   #
PaulR01 wrote:
#6 has the wow factor.

Paul,
Thanks for your comment yes I agree with you.
Regards,
Mike
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.