Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: SHLeM52
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 next>>
Sep 23, 2015 11:53:31   #
jdubu wrote:
Yes, there are color coded WD drives. After using other drives that failed (Seagate comes to mind immediately) I use nothing but WD in my NAS systems now. Have red WDs in 2 Synology 2 bay units for home and office since 2013 running 24/7 and no problems to date.

From a site I found:

Green drives are earth-friendly, lead and halogen free, with reduced dependency on rare earth materials and a commitment to using only conflict-free raw materials. They are energy efficient, cool and quiet.
Blue drives are the original WD drive, built to the highest standards of quality and reliability, offering the features and capacity ideal for your everyday computing needs. Available with Serial ATA (SATA) interface, with mobile and desktop drives as well as ultrabook drives, this is the workhorse of the WD range
Red drives are designed for Network Attached Storage (NAS) in small and home office environments, offering high levels of compatibility and excellent support.
Black drives deliver maximum performance for power computing, featuring high-performance electronics and a rock-solid mechanical architecture as well as high capacity storage.

For more info, here is the url:

http://companies.mybroadband.co.za/blog/2012/10/02/western-digitals-colour-coding-red-blue-green-or-black/
Yes, there are color coded WD drives. After using ... (show quote)


Don't forget about the Velociraptor (used to be yellow) the 10,000 rpm drives for high end workstations, and the purple drives for surveillance systems.
Go to
Sep 20, 2015 17:58:31   #
Hasselblad has developed a digital back for thier medium format cameras dating back to some of their 1950 vintage stuff, but at $15,500. apiece not something I can afford.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1070610&gclid=CjwKEAjwsvmvBRCT5ozK-dmY7D4SJACyIoJmzrzP0aaDuZLyWPLWjVHHFzYhA1yv4iqrx7kJVDOzmhoCCGzw_wcB&is=REG&m=Y&A=details&Q=
Go to
Sep 20, 2015 12:33:56   #
BBurns wrote:
You are right, Kodak came in black with grey lids. The photo is Fuji.

I remember buying Agfa when it came in an aluminum can with a screw on lid.


Yep.


Go to
Sep 17, 2015 11:33:29   #
MS. DONNA wrote:
Hi does anyone know what size frame to purchase for an 8x12 photo?
Or can anyone some how explain how to shoot the right way so you can crop properly 8 x 10 mostly water pics, bridges & nature?
thank you
Donna


Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but I've used these modular frames on a few odd shaped pictures, and they came out pretty good. Just pick the length and width of the size you want. They come in a lot of colors and work with mats and glass. Just choose the length and height you need. They run from 8" to 50".
http://www.frameusa.com/u-frame-kit-i-picture-frames


Go to
Sep 10, 2015 17:43:03   #
Wait a Minute, Is that the Cheshire Cat?
Go to
Aug 26, 2015 10:41:25   #
raymondh wrote:
Insolence personified!


Yeah, that's his best "Don't screw with me Papa look!"
Go to
Aug 24, 2015 23:45:26   #
.....knowing it all, at the ripe old age of 15 (I'm almost 16).....


(Download)
Go to
Aug 24, 2015 23:22:18   #
Oldest Grandson with those "don't mess with me" eyes


(Download)
Go to
Aug 2, 2015 09:17:50   #
sb wrote:
So far no one has explained to me just what their $300 tripod does that the $45 Slik doesn't do. It is stable and it is lightweight. NO lightweight tripod would be particularly safe for a heavy long telephoto lens, but if I want something to carry simply for shooting some long exposures or some HDR shots, it works just fine, thank you very much. If I use it for my heavy telephoto I keep my strap around my neck, as I would with ANY lightweight tripod. It did not sound like the person asking this question was a professional who wanted to plunk down very serious cash for a tripod.

And by the way - my Honda runs just as good as your BMW, it is built better, and will probably last longer.
So far no one has explained to me just what their ... (show quote)


I agree with you sb. I've had a Slik tripod I've been using since the 80s. I replace the standard head with arca swiss type ball head and it's even better than before. Not everyone has the deep pockets to afford the high $$ tripod, so we make do knowing the limitations of what we have.
Go to
Jul 26, 2015 21:05:59   #
Plus-X pan or Tri-X.
Used to buy it in 100 ft rolls, and load my own cartridges.
Go to
Jul 11, 2015 09:43:53   #
waegwan wrote:
Wow! I just looked at some YouTube tutorials on ACDSee 8, it's pretty cool. ;)


I've been using ACDSee for years, just to sort and manage files, but with the new Ultimate version they added a new dimension with layer editor. Nice!
Go to
Jul 10, 2015 08:20:02   #
ACDSEE Ultimate!
Go to
Jul 2, 2015 01:21:51   #
Vista??
I wasted the best part of a day trying to reinstall Vista on a laptop that came with Vista. The original Hard drive went bad so I figured I'd replace it with another I had that I'd salvaged from a laptop with a bad MOBO.
So, remember, Vista doesn't even work with Vista!!!!
Install Windows 7.
Go to
Jul 1, 2015 13:48:09   #
Boone wrote:
Ok...if I had the right gear, I would just experiment on my own to find the answer. But since I do not, I will ask my friends!

Question:

I have a Variable ND filter that I use on a 62mm Zoom lens. It works fine...except at the widest aperture setting of the lens. (2.8) At the f/2.8 aperture I get the "Xing effect" or the vegnetting effect. I understand why this is, but I was wondering; "IF I HAD".... say a larger mm ND filter...such as a 77mm, and used a "Step up ring", would this lessen or maybe illuminate the "Xing or vignetting effect"?
Thanks, Boone.
As always, I appreciate any comments, and I thank you in advance. "THANK YOU ALL"! :roll: :thumbup:
Ok...if I had the right gear, I would just experim... (show quote)


I had the same question in mind, so I'm glad you ask it first. Here's what I found. Most the variable ND filters have the same problem with the Xing and vignetting effect. I'm not real sure about the real high end filters, they're a little out of my price range. Tiffen sells a kit of 3 ND filters that are stackable, so you can combine them for added effect, but you may still get vignetting, but not the Xing. you can take care of the Vignetting in PP. The kit runs $62.90 compared to the Variable for $119.95 FYI!
Go to
Jul 1, 2015 11:02:45   #
74images wrote:
So you had problems with your Sunpack Flash also! I bought a Sunpack Digiflash 3000 with my Canon SX 50 last year in February 2014, & I started having problems with the flash by the end of may last year where it would fire a low flash & half of my photos were dark, I had to use the Pop up flash on the SX 50, but did not have the long range flash abilty like the Sunpack, the flash was recommended to me cause I couldn't afford a Canon flash, & I had a $700.00 budget to work with.

...anyway why the Sunpack flash doesn't work well with the SX 50 I don't know?

...& my flash cost me $70.00 at Samy's Camera here in the L.A. area, & Sunpack is, or has been a very reputable flash for years, what happened with them with their digital flashes I don't understand?

if somebody is using a Sunpack flash on their cameras & have had problems with them should post on its experience that HE OR SHE has had problems with. :thumbdown:

74images
So you had problems with your Sunpack Flash also! ... (show quote)


Sunpak's quality must have gone down in the last decade. I have several older Sunpaks (circa 1990's) that I still use as off camera flashes and beside the long recycle time, they seem fine. I use them in conjunction with Yougnuo flash triggers. I can't use them with the cameras TTL, just manual, other than that. I use my flash meter to set them up. I still have my eye on an Alien Bee, because I know eventually I'll have to put the Sunpaks out to pasture. Just like me!


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.