Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tita1948
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23 next>>
Nov 1, 2014 11:12:23   #
Gpa-15 wrote:
Thanks 'Shellback''. --- apologize for delay in Thanking You.!!!

I just sent an email to UHH-Admin-Group complaining that every time they notified me that someone had responded to my Question, there wasn't an opportunity to REPLY to the Responder!!!

Do YOU know for sure that I MUST Log-In AGAIN if I want to Reply to a Responder???


Go to the bottom "Quote Reply" That will answer just that person
Go to
Oct 29, 2014 00:15:06   #
tdekany wrote:
Don't be - forget about bridge cameras


why
Go to
Oct 29, 2014 00:03:33   #
CHOLLY wrote:
Bridge cameras are a type of mirrorless camera.

The cameras listed above are also mirrorless. They produce some of the best image quality available in the right hands. ;)


Oh boy now I'm really confused. But I'll work on it. Thx
Go to
Oct 28, 2014 22:05:04   #
tdekany wrote:
Yes you are confusing things. I've given you links to look at. Have you?

There are 3 sensor sizes that you would want to be looking into. M4/3, aps-c and full frame


I couldn't find "alternative" forum but I did see some beautiful pictures. What did you want me to see?
Go to
Oct 28, 2014 22:00:17   #
tdekany wrote:
I'm just going to be blunt. Nothing personal against you, but your I initial question is extremely ignorant. I am sorry. I still can't figure out how one can come to that sort of conclusion, not to mention "as a pro"?????
Do you not know that it is the person behind the camera that takes the picture? So if you see a picture that is not tack sharp, do you not automatically think that that is the user? I mean when I see a less than "tack sharp" picture or pictures posted anywhere that were taken with a dslr I just move on to the next one without ever having that thought cross my mind. Again, I apologise, but this is the most illogical question I have ever seen on a forum. (I wanted to use the word "stupidest" but don't mean to sound mean)
I'm just going to be blunt. Nothing personal again... (show quote)

That ship already sailed. No need to be mean.
Go to
Oct 28, 2014 21:37:18   #
Morning Star wrote:
I'd be willing to post a couple of crops - after two bad experiences with posting photos to someone else, I will definitely never post my full-size photos or photos of my grandkids again.
Even the crops will have to wait till either later tonight or tomorrow - gotto go out tonight.


Sorry about your bad experience that must have been scary. But yes I would like to see other photos that you have taken with a mirrorless camera. Don't worry about when you send it. I just appreciate your help.

One other question does mirrorless mean the same as bridge? Maybe I'm confusing things.
Go to
Oct 28, 2014 20:29:22   #
To answer question I am serious about photos that are not tack, (razor) sharp. No I do not say that camera companies are putting out "duds" it's just the photo I have seen are not as sharp as I want or that stock companies will accept.

Like I said I do want one so I am seriously looking. Please send me your proofs from different cameras. I really want to see them. Don't get in a huff I'm just looking.
Go to
Oct 28, 2014 16:41:16   #
If you don't have the lens racked out to a ridicules length is there a mirrorless camera that takes tack sharp photos? So far what I have seen leaves me unimpressed. Everything always looks soft.

I hope someone can prove me wrong because I really want one :-)
Go to
Oct 27, 2014 19:52:19   #
nanaval wrote:
Gave me a laugh :lol:


Me too.
Go to
Oct 27, 2014 13:14:35   #
Lorima wrote:
I was sent this today and thought I would share it.

Make sure to read it all the way to the end for it to make sense.


My husband and son are avid bear hunters. I need to send this to them but they do not belong to UHH. How can I send them this picture? Gotta have this one !
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 12:36:17   #
lensenvy wrote:
My nephew asked me to take some family pictures for him.

I have searched on this site and others about family photo shoots but I would really appreciate any tips or do's and don'ts Here are the details:

2 adults and 2 children, a newborn and 2 year old.

I am hoping to do this outdoors... I am not great at indoor lighting etc.

I have a D7000, 24-70 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 18-200 and a 50mm 1.8 etc.
Tripod, sb900 (barley know how to use), remote shutter release, reflector and a Gary Fong diffuser.

Any advice would be great..thanks!
My nephew asked me to take some family pictures fo... (show quote)


IMHO I think the best thing about family poses is how you arrange them. Everyone in line or by size is boring. Step out of the box. You can have the best camera and lenses but if the pose is stiff or boring the shot is ho hum. Make them happy or goofy or quiet just not boring. IMHO
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 10:28:20   #
tt wrote:
Which fairly inexpensive digital camera from Target would you recommend?


I think a Canon SX50 would be a great start. You still can move from PS to more creative modes. It's also now reduced in price because they now came out with the SX60.
Go to
Oct 16, 2014 22:32:54   #
dickwilber wrote:
Having shot hundreds of team photo's I can tell you it's virtually impossible not to do boring! So your use of the Jungle Gym is inspired - nice work! But now I'll tell you how I believe it could have been stronger. By getting up higher (a ladder provided by the school's maintenance staff) you can a) reduce the problem of the faces towards the back being hidden by those in front, and b) if it's high enough, put all the faces more nearly into the same plane, reducing the apparent size difference.

But, like I said, Nice Job!
Having shot hundreds of team photo's I can tell yo... (show quote)


I understand your ideas. Maybe next year. Thanks for taking the time to respond.
Go to
Oct 15, 2014 11:32:07   #
DJ Craig wrote:
Shot these two of our cross country team this year.


Thank you for your examples.
Go to
Oct 14, 2014 09:37:38   #
amehta wrote:
Especially if you have a monopod and have a chance to practice, using a slightly slower shutter speed and panning with the runner can produce a great photo.

Don't try to do too much. Decide what you think you can accomplish and concentrate on that.

Remember to take pictures of the fans, or the celebrations after a race.


ooo thank you for the reminder about taking pictures of the fans. Good idea thank you.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.