Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: lizardworks
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
Oct 17, 2011 12:40:04   #
Try locking the mirror up when shooting on a tripod and using a remote shutter release. You look like you are very close, so it may be something as small as the mirror or touching the shutter on the camera. Hard to say what is causing softness without knowing what equipment you are using and your settings.
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 12:00:36   #
evandr wrote:
lizardworks wrote:
evandr wrote:
lizardworks wrote:
gessman wrote:
At last count, yours would be the 4,973,565,741st shot of the mill and by golly, it's about as nice a one as I've seen. The lake is a little more obscure but equally as nice to gaze upon. You do good work. Lovely.


Gessman, are you among the 4,973,565,741 (hee, hee)? I know it's been done to death, but I just had to try it! Thank you for your kind words, sir.


That is the wonderful thing about photogtaphy, there are 4,973,565,741 different pictures of the same mill and maybe 41 of them have a truly unique angle, its all good. What matters is that the photographer is proud of his or her own work, and remember, there are far more people who have never seen a picture of the mill before (including myself) so for them this may as well be the only picture of the mill in existance and its a good one!
quote=lizardworks quote=gessman At last count, y... (show quote)


Thank you so much for all the nice comments! If you google Crystal City Colorado you can see all the other 4,973,565,741 others that Gessman is referring to :mrgreen: . I'm looking forward to seeing these cryptic Tabernacle photos that Gessman mentioned.
quote=evandr quote=lizardworks quote=gessman At... (show quote)


Cryptic isn't the right word. I asked gessman to make me a challenge using a wide angle lens so he said shoot a whisky bottle with the spires of the LDS Temple in the background. I thought it would make a great contrast of idiologies and so I agreed to do it. Now all I have to do is find the time to get to Salt Lake City with my props and equipment and sprawl myself on the sidwalk with my camera. :? :-P
quote=lizardworks quote=evandr quote=lizardwork... (show quote)


Ah, I can't think of a better test of a wide angle lens than the LDS Temple. The whisky bottle is an interesting juxtaposition, hope you don't get in trouble :wink:
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 11:26:32   #
David707 wrote:
LOL, I can hear it now. Thanks for the tip on the book, Liz. I ordered LEARNING TO SEE CREATIVELY by Brian Petersen at the recommendation of someone else on here. OK, you talked me into it...I'll order it. It's cheaper on Amazon than Ebay!!!


David, I read Learning To See Creatively also. Brian Petersen is an excellent teacher his information is straight to the point and easy to understand. When you finish his book you'll be ready for the one I recommended which is more in depth about all the theories of composition and sometimes a little overwhelming with all the information. I probably should have recommended Brian Petersen first, but since you beat me to it-no harm done. Enjoy!
Go to
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Oct 17, 2011 11:14:00   #
Have you considered extension tubes? They are simply tubes that fit between your lens and the camera body, they enable the lens you already have to focus much closer (I mean really close). A number of true macro photographers use them on macro lens to get the focus even closer! They work extremely well and do not degrade optical sharpness like the add-on lenses can. Also, they will give images that are much closer to what a true macro lens can do. They are light weight and relatively inexpensive (a good set with multiple tube lengths can be found for under $100.00 new). Also because they go on the back of your lens one set will fit all your lenses-just make sure you buy a set with your type camera mount (Canon, Nikon, Pentax, etc.). You will lose your ability to autofocus, but you should always use manual focus for macro anyway (or you will end up pulling your hair out, trust me).
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 11:01:06   #
mljphoto wrote:
JimH wrote:
Ordinarily, I'd jump on the 5D in a New York minute. But if the vast majority of your shots are portraits and family mug shots, as you say, the enormous benefits of the full frame 5D are somewhat wasted. I think of the 5D and other f/f bodies as outdoor cameras, primarily. I'd save the money difference between the T3 and the 5D, and use it for a nice Canon "L" portrait lens.


That's part of where my problems lay!! Most of these pictures are outdoor pictures!!! My mother and I are in the process of buying this building, that has a variety of rooms, like a mini mall, and I am looking at putting a portrait studio in it. Which in that case, then I would be getting indoor as well as outdoor. Do you think the T3i, would then suit me best still? Course most of my outdoor pictures are portraits, and family mug shots. I also do pictures at the horse shows our saddle club does. I really truly appreciate any input!!
quote=JimH Ordinarily, I'd jump on the 5D in a Ne... (show quote)


I think what JimH means by outdoor is landscape photography. Correct me if I'm wrong, Jim. Landscape is where you would see the true difference with full-frame camera. As for the T3i, I'm not sure you would notice anything different from your T1i. It's not really much of an upgrade as there are very few differences. Have you considered the 7D?
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 03:03:27   #
au2panner wrote:
Liz, I was thinking the same thing (just didnt want to say it) But then I took these 2 pics and it kinda throws all of that rule out lol.


I don't want to imply that you should ignore the rule of thirds, because it works, I'm just saying there are other elements of composition that also apply. Your second photo shows the use of line and repeating elements, it leads the eye into the photograph. There are many more elements that lead to a composition that works and I'm not claiming to be an expert, hence the book recommendation. Composition is one thing that I continue to struggle with and frequently like to brush up on it. By the way, the toes are a very touching photograph and exhibit good composition and does follow the rule of thirds-look at it again. Nice job!
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 02:38:13   #
David707 wrote:
Thank you. I am looking forward to my next trip to Maui. Hopefully by then I will be a more seasoned veteran of the digital world. So much to learn insofar as composition goes. I understand the basics of photography, its just acquiring an eye for more than "tourist" photos...if that makes any sense.


Oh, man, you are going to hear about the "Rule of Thirds" until it makes you sick. Might I suggest a book-The Photographer's Eye by Michael Freeman. It is a very in depth book on composition and will give you a lot more info than just the rule of thirds, you can find it on Amazon.
Go to
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Oct 17, 2011 01:50:28   #
Nicely done with a P&S! Wait til you get to try it again with your T2i!
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 01:48:18   #
Hi David, welcome to the hog! I think you're going to love that camera, I have the T1i and love it! If you were using a film EOS, you will catch up quickly. Hope you find this fun and informative...
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 01:41:01   #
au2panner wrote:
Liz, maybe we could meet up and take some pics together and learn from each other. I've always wanted to shoot the older buildings up by you. And of course there is always the trees too!


Sounds good to me-send me a PM and I'll give you my #
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 01:39:22   #
evandr wrote:
lizardworks wrote:
gessman wrote:
At last count, yours would be the 4,973,565,741st shot of the mill and by golly, it's about as nice a one as I've seen. The lake is a little more obscure but equally as nice to gaze upon. You do good work. Lovely.


Gessman, are you among the 4,973,565,741 (hee, hee)? I know it's been done to death, but I just had to try it! Thank you for your kind words, sir.


That is the wonderful thing about photogtaphy, there are 4,973,565,741 different pictures of the same mill and maybe 41 of them have a truly unique angle, its all good. What matters is that the photographer is proud of his or her own work, and remember, there are far more people who have never seen a picture of the mill before (including myself) so for them this may as well be the only picture of the mill in existance and its a good one!
quote=lizardworks quote=gessman At last count, y... (show quote)


Thank you so much for all the nice comments! If you google Crystal City Colorado you can see all the other 4,973,565,741 others that Gessman is referring to :mrgreen: . I'm looking forward to seeing these cryptic Tabernacle photos that Gessman mentioned.
Go to
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Oct 17, 2011 01:30:57   #
gessman wrote:
lizardworks wrote:
Gessman, I have indeed done some shooting on the Colorado National Monument. Lots of interesting rock formations and canyons. I think it would be best in early morning light, I've tried it at sunset and there's just too many shadows. It's right on the western edge of Grand Junction. If you come this direction on I-70, it's about a five minute drive from the Fruita exit. Actually, I love the drive on I-70, there are so many great places to get off and take some photos. Anytime I drive to Denver it always takes me at least two hours longer than it should because I have to stop at every rest area in Glenwood Canyon and burn through a memory card.

And, I agree, this is something of a solitary persuit in practice, but I sure do enjoy gabbing about it after the fact.
Gessman, I have indeed done some shooting on the C... (show quote)


Thanks for the info on the monument. You're really in a prime jumping off spot where you are, Moab just down the way, Arches, Bryce, and then Monument Valley all within a fairly short drive. You're really lucky. Of course, I guess you can only do that so much, eh?

And, yep, talking is good. I've noticed, there's not as many forum members in this region for the concentration of photographers here in Colorado. It may catch on later. I guess we'll see. Maybe they're a little more like me than I am at this point, quiet and solitary. :-) I didn't think you were ever going to say anything at all. You're coming around some, huh?
quote=lizardworks Gessman, I have indeed done som... (show quote)


You've got me started and now I won't shut up :!: :!: :!:

And you're right, this is an amazing place for photography-it's almost overwhelming. So many choices.......

Yes, that's Grand Junction in all it's glory :roll:
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 01:20:07   #
Cameraman wrote:
I just wanted to add my 2 cents. Lightroom is used to adjust RAW files whereas PhotoShop is used to adjust JPG files.
In Bridge or in Lightroom you can always go back to the original image with the origianl settings which you cannot do in PhotoShop. Once you change the jpg files you cannot recover and go back (unless you saved the original copy somewhere else).
Even though you can do almost everything in PhotoShop that you can do in Lightroom, it is much easier (at least in my opion once you get used to it.) And if you do not like the change you made you can always go back to the original photo settings.
One difference between Bridge and Lightoroom is that in Bridge after you delete some pictures you can renumber the selected photos again and convert them to JPG and you will have a one to one relationship between the RAW and JPG photos. That way if I have to make any changes to the JPG photo I deliveerd to the client I know which RAW photo image I need to go back to. You may also wnat to go back to the original photo at a later date becasue you learned some mroe techniques to manipulate the image or you got better at using the software or later when you buy some new software program.
There is one thing I do not like about Lightroom (or may be I have not learned how to do it). I did not find a feature in Lightroom to sequence/renumber the original photos. I like to deliver the photos to my clients after renumbering and converting them to JPG format so that I have a back up copy of the RAW images which have the same name/number as the one delivered. Does anyone know how to renumber photos in Lightroom?
I just wanted to add my 2 cents. Lightroom is use... (show quote)


Thanks for the info, Cameraman! However, I have CS5 and it most definitely has Adobe Camera Raw included-I use it all the time. But, thank you for the info regarding the differences between what you can do in Lightroom that you can't do in Bridge.
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 01:04:59   #
Okay, I've been upgraded to "a regular here" and I realized that I've never actually introduced myself-I have no idea where my manners are! So, I guess I'll give you a little of my photography background...

A long, long time ago in a land far, far away....(okay, it was really about 22 years ago and it was the land was Virginia) I bought my first 35mm camera and took my first photography class. The camera was purchased on a whim for around a hundred dollars and it didn't do anything for you except advance the film. It came with a 50mm lens (what a deal!). The class was all black and white photography and covered processing our own negatives and making our own prints. It taught me a lot about how much work goes into making a good photograph after pressing the shutter.

Anyway, fast forward about 20 years, I'm finally getting into digital and loving it! I'm a complete neophyte when it comes to Photoshop, so I'll probably be asking a lot of questions, please be patient with me-I don't know what I don't know :roll: . I'm also really new to forums-this is the first one I've ever participated in. I'm finding it to be a lot of fun and very informative, not to mention very inspiring seeing everyone's great work!

A little about me personally-I live outside the very small town of Cedaredge, Colorado on a small farm with six horses, five chickens, three cats, two dogs, two bunnies and one grumpy husband :shock: . I work as a dental hygienist to pay for this really expensive hobby and dream of the day I win the lottery so I can spend all of my time behind a camera. As for the lizardworks moniker, my nickname has been "Lizard" for as long as I can remember. The iguana in my avatar is Pancho and he actually belongs to a friend.

Anyway, thanks for spending the time to read this overly long introduction. I look forward to picking everyone's brains and seeing your work! Liz

This is what I look like without a giant lizard stuck to my face

Go to
Oct 16, 2011 23:58:08   #
Holy S**T! :evil:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.