Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: stan0301
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 73 next>>
Oct 3, 2023 13:28:11   #
RAW isa capture format where you say "I can do a better job of processing this image than the software in my camera (you can)
JPEG is a (rather good) processing program that will present a rather good internally processed image from the image you capture - it is also the format. used to print photographs from digital captures
Go to
Oct 3, 2023 13:24:17   #
Thanks - with fifty plus lenses I've been holding off - and likely will continue to do so
Go to
Sep 29, 2023 18:19:23   #
That is why God invented lawyers - but ramming it down their throats would be pretty expensive
Go to
Sep 27, 2023 18:02:58   #
My lens hoods cost a bit over $400 each - stray light hitting the lens degrades your image - no question. When ever I see someone shooting with no lens hood my first thought is - clueless
Go to
Sep 25, 2023 23:38:58   #
I have those too - I have heard there might be a third around 200mmp
Go to
Sep 15, 2023 14:52:20   #
Personally I would take an 18-300, and an 8-16 - in any event you might want something a bit longer
Go to
Sep 15, 2023 14:49:31   #
if it is all legit you have a portrait - if not a essay image - which is perfectly ok
Go to
Sep 15, 2023 14:47:14   #
SewClever wrote:
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my favorite walk around lens is the Nikkor 18-200mm. Recently it began slipping. I now use a band on it, but I just don't feel the photos are as sharp arls they once were. I know with a long zoom sharpness is often compromised, and I have several other lenses that do an excellent job. But as an almost 72 yr old woman, although spry enough, sometimes I just want to grab one lens for a long hike. I'm looking between Nikkor, Tamron, and Sigma. I want new, as I don't want to deal with slipping again any time soon. I'm looking at 18mm-300mm, or even 400mm is quality isn't terribly compromised. And suggestions from personal experience? Thank you!!
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my fa... (show quote)


I usually pair an 8-16 with an 18-300 (with other lenses for what they do best) - and have had no problems - sharp? are you using a remote release? a tripod? a good sun shade?
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 14:25:05   #
When I studied with Ansel Adams he said “The image captured by your camera is only the starting point for creating the image in your mind”
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 14:22:50   #
Totally depends on how you plan to use it - but - it is rare to see an image that can’t be improved by cropping
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 14:05:26   #
Remember- all you have to photograph is your interaction
Go to
Sep 11, 2023 23:21:37   #
The 10-20, and the 18-300
Go to
Sep 8, 2023 14:05:30   #
I studied with Ansel Adams, and have taken over two million pictures and my wife’s iPhone generally meters better than my Nikons - although it doesn’t have much of a workaround for back light
Go to
Sep 6, 2023 17:11:11   #
I have never packed the lens separately - but - I have had checked cameras stolen - my kit always goes into the overhead
Go to
Aug 27, 2023 17:41:05   #
Rab-Eye wrote:
I assume that if you do, you always move your focus point to your subject, and if not, you lock focus and recompose. Simple. My problem is that I don’t do either one consistently. I guess I should make up my mind and stick to one or the other. But for now, given that I switch back and forth, I think it makes the most sense not to lock them together. I’m not looking for some magic answer, but I’m curious—does anyone have an argument for linking them?

Sorry for a rather dumb question.
I assume that if you do, you always move your focu... (show quote)
I would never thinking of taking a picture without telling three camera which point to pay attention to
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 73 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.