Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Crwiwy
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 148 next>>
Feb 20, 2016 02:27:42   #
No so good for the savers and pensioners!
Go to
Feb 18, 2016 10:20:16   #
jerryc41 wrote:
If you have a lot of money, you will, statistically, live longer than the poor folks. And the gap is widening. another way to live longer is to move to one of the many countries where life expectancy is greater than it is in the USA. We rank either 34 or 40, depending how you figure it.

http://mashable.com/2016/02/16/income-life-expectancy/#1ZlwXQqr.mqc

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy


The rich can afford good health care, food, safer cars and neighborhoods.
Go to
Feb 18, 2016 10:12:12   #
rleonetti wrote:
If you switch to Lightroom and shoot raw, do you see a photo when you upload from the camera, or do you have to do some processing before you see anything?

Do you normally shoot just RAW, or RAW+jpg at the same time?

Currently when I shoot all jpg I immediately get a photo and some of them survive without any processing. Does that happen with RAW?


LR will show you thumbnails of the pictures on your camera card whether in JPG or RAW.
Once you have downloaded the selected images you will be able to view them full size without processing.
Then just process the ones you want.

You can also set LR up to automatically apply processing as the files are imported into LR - this includes RAW processing and lens correction.
Go to
Feb 18, 2016 10:06:01   #
Jerrin1 wrote:
Hi Chums, I just bought Lightroom in order to process the RAW files from my Olympus EM1. I tried Olympus Viewer 3 but at 60 years of age felt I would probably die before I managed to process my first 750 images. Talk about slow! Anyway, love Lightroom 6 but having real problems trying to master the cloning tool. I would really appreciate it if someone is able to provide me with a link to a good video tutorial on the subject. Watched Chelsea Northrup have a go but she stated that it's far better to export the image from Lightroom 6 to Photoshop to carry out any cloning. I don't have Photoshop but will purchase it, depending on the results of this appeal. Thanks a lot.
Hi Chums, I just bought Lightroom in order to proc... (show quote)


LR clone tool is OK for dust spots and similar but for much greater control it is best to export to another program - easy from LR and it takes the edited file back in.

It is very doubtful that you would really need Photoshop and is much cheaper to get Photoshop Elements that has the major bits of PS without all the surplus controls that a professional would ask for (and have time to master them).

There are some good deals on PS Elements and remember that after purchase you own it - not rent it for as long as you keep paying the fees!

Most people (a lot of pro's too) do perhaps 95% of their work in LR and only go vert to Elements or PS for more complex jobs.
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 09:32:38   #
Crwiwy wrote:
You may be able to make - or purchase - some lightweight narrow wardrobe doors and use simple hinges to hold them together in a zig-zag shape which would be self supporting.

For very light weight partitions you can get spring loaded poles - normally used for shower curtains - which would go between floor and ceiling without any fixings.


Another lightweight and easy to make is to use internal wall cladding planks - which are tong and groove - held together with a couple of planks across the others. Again, hinge the sections in a zig-zag shape.

This method would be quite neat, low cost and easy to make up even for people new to DIY.
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 06:22:39   #
You may be able to make - or purchase - some lightweight narrow wardrobe doors and use simple hinges to hold them together in a zig-zag shape which would be self supporting.

For very light weight partitions you can get spring loaded poles - normally used for shower curtains - which would go between floor and ceiling without any fixings.
Go to
Feb 10, 2016 06:50:20   #
Woodworm65 wrote:
I have combed the internet about these wide angle zoom lenses and am more confused than ever. I am looking at 10 to 24 mm in all of them for landscape and home interior pictures, I brought the subject up before about the Tamron and UHH people had it were very pleased with it but the web and youtube have different opinions which most favor the Sigma and very good marks on the Tokina. Trying to get a better view point from fellow pro's or better than me amature photogrphers please help.


I did a lot of research on UWA lens including hands on at a camera shop and various reviews. A most useful review on 8 Ultra Wide Angle lens is on Youtube at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRSyTOosOcc
As a result I purchased the Canon 10~18mm for its quality, lightness and silent AF. I have been very pleased with it and have been on several outdoor photo shoots where the lens has stayed on the camera all day.
Go to
Feb 9, 2016 08:33:32   #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/identify-mosquitoes-diseases-zika-virus-2016-2


If you find yourself close enough to identify a dangerous mosquito - then it is probably too late! :-o
Go to
Feb 7, 2016 08:09:43   #
Opal wrote:
I am getting frustrated with photo printing services in my area. I want prints made but they (walmart and meijer and walgreens) always auto crop. Any advice on being able to have my prints the proper size without the "professionals" messing them up??


Have a look at more professional services. I tried our equivalent to Walmart and was very disappointed with the colours and printing. I have also noticed that firms - especially the cheaper ones - seem to favour 4:3 aspect prints where DSLR's are 3:2 and I refuse to make my prints conform with what they want me to have.
Go to
Feb 5, 2016 07:26:56   #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Anybody out there who switched from a PC to a Mac, and later regretted the switch
It seems there are those that switched from a PC to MAC and "never looked back; but are there those that switched and did "look back"?


Owned a MAC for a while thinking it would be much better and solve the PC problems but changed back.

MAC's are built better - but much more expensive.
MAC's were more secure but no so much now.
MAC's are faster - but be prepared to purchase a new machine every few years.

I tried both a iMac and a laptop.
The iMac was a nice neat computer - but didn't appear to have any upgrade potential.

The big but: the software I wanted to run wouldn't run on that version of the operating system and the newer operating system system wouldn't run on the hardware I had so I would need to purchase a newer machine to run the software - for now.

The laptop was a lovely solid machine but even worse software problems as it was older. But it does make a great DVD player for taking on holiday!

I had moved from Windows problems to MAC problems so moved back to the system I knew that was easily and cheaply upgradable and runs my favorite software from the latest LightRoom to my 18 year old Lotus suite.
Go to
Feb 1, 2016 02:07:36   #
foathog wrote:
After reading all of this, I think it's obvious that there are TOO MANY damn programs available. LOL. Which path do you take??? And everyone here has a different idea. Right now I'm using the Canon program with a goal of getting the latest LR down the road.


Other than using a free program this is probably the best bet.
Another big advantage with LR is that it is non-destructive so you can make as many alterations as you like and go back to wherever you want to without affecting the original file at all.
You can also make different versions of the same picture.
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 11:37:16   #
burkphoto wrote:
RTFM

HOWEVER, there are exceptions! A very expensive FX lens will sometimes outperform a very inexpensive DX lens on a DX body.


I should sincerely hope so too - or was this a typo?
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 11:29:49   #
DGStinner wrote:
Have you tried Lightroom? There are a ton of great tutorials on YouTube by Adobe (Julianne Kost and Terry White), Anthony Morganti and Serge Ramelli.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Also checkout B&H lectures on YouTube for as much tuition as you can stand.
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 11:25:42   #
TLAT wrote:
ok ok ok. I've always shot in JPG but......I'm thinking about RAW. What do I have to do the RAW files to send them via email ? I use PSE for light PP. I'm thinking about RAW because of white balance issues.....particularly flourescent. Plus I understand it gives more flexibility.

Obviously I'm a beginner. I use a Canon T6S with a variety of Canon and Tokina lens.

Thanks in advance for the help.

TJL


I would recommend Adobe Lightroom - it will take your RAW files and convert them to many formats including JPG.
It has a quite gentle learning curve, is very versatile, will do probably 95% of the processing you need and will organize your photos as well as rename or resize as required.
There are profiles in it for Canon as well as other cameras and also lens profiles which can automatically correct for your lens.
There are many very good Lightroom tutorials on YouTube - especially check out the B&H lectures on there, many are 90 mins long.
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 11:19:51   #
VR - you can satisfactorily hand hold down to 1/8 or 1/4 sec depending on focal length.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 148 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.