Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: smcaleer
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 68 next>>
Nov 20, 2013 21:23:59   #
Bob Yankle wrote:
Do you give permission for some of us to edit your work? There a number of people here who could make changes you requested and return the photo to this topic.


Sure, Bob. I'm always open to help.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 21:22:27   #
photoninja1 wrote:
Nice fix. The white thingy bothered me more than the slight back focus, which softens the face. Going forward, you might try using a smaller aperture to get slightly more DOF. I don't think that wil ruin the bokeh and it will make it easier to nail the focus.


Thank you for looking and commenting.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 21:21:41   #
Chuck_893 wrote:
Ah! Indeed he looks worried. His eyes are even red. I have shot lots in hospital rooms as a volunteer for a non-profit. The light is perfectly dreadful since most comes from directly overhead and is fluorescent, or mixed (mixed in this case I think, but your white balance looks fine).

I've tried one, removing the white thingy (sink?) and brightening his eyes. That's all I did. I think it gives him more sparkle without ruining the somber mood. (And I sincerely hope that your brother, his dad, is doing well!!!)
Ah! Indeed he looks worried. His eyes are even red... (show quote)


Thank you and I do like how you edited the shot. How did you brighten the eyes?
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 17:30:43   #
Jay Pat wrote:
#s 1,3 and 4 look like regular room lighting.

But, #2....Looks like your light source could be from a window. Quality of light looks better. Great detail of face. Shadows give face good dimension.

Pat
Self proclaimed level of photography expertise...
"Snap Shot Guy"


Thank you for commenting. There weren't any windows. I guess it was just light and positioning.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 17:27:04   #
bedgmon wrote:
Thank you, I do think you made it look much better and I greatly appreciate your time and help. Cross your fingers and toes and just maybe my composition will improve. What if I used an area focus opposed to spot focus? Would that make the whole bird be in focus?
I just can't seem to get a nice sharp image on anything hand holding.
I noticed you use a 70D. How are you liking it? Rick Sammons thinks it is the best camera value. I have heard only good things about it! Would love to have the low light capabilities. Again, much thanks to you.
Thank you, I do think you made it look much better... (show quote)


Honestly, as for focus, I can't be of any help because I'm still having focus issues myself.

As for the 70D, I love it! Unfortunately, I haven't mastered the low light shooting without lots of noise. The ISO will go as high as 3200 and yet noise seems to start around 400 ISO. I'm still learning, but I really do love the camera. I use to shoot with Nikon so the transition over to Canon threw in an added learning curve. It's faster than my last camera, better in low light (my Nikon was impossible to get anything, including noisy shots, in low light), it has way more bells and whistles and I'm slowly trying to learn how to use things.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 17:09:00   #
Hi everybody. I wasn't sure where to post this. Other sections are for C & A, but only allow one photo at a time and this is more a small series. So, if I'm wrong in posting here, please forgive me.

I've decided to focus on some of my weakest skills for the next few months (I don't really think I have any strong skills yet, but I know my weakest).

I've never been good with lighting or shooting people. I knew I was going to be sitting waiting for hours in the hospital last night. My brother was having a bit of surgery done and figured the hospital was a perfect place to figure out how to expose in junk lighting. I also figured I had my brother and my nephew trapped so I could practice on them and they couldn't run away.

I know these are not professional portraits. I know there's probably a ton wrong with them, but I'd like to learn what so that I can learn what to do different next time.

I wanted to remove the colorful stuff on the right, but every time I tried, it looked very noticeable.







Go to
Nov 20, 2013 16:51:27   #
Chuck_893 wrote:
Mama is correct that the focus is a hair back—i.e. it's on the front of his hair (actually) so the whole thing is a little soft, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. I don't mind the crop at all. I like that his eyes are looking back toward the center of the frame, and I think it works as a horizontal. The white thingy back there is easily knocked down by most PP apps. There's light in the hair giving good separation. What's mostly bothersome to me is that the light is about 3/4 "back." The left side of his face, neck, and nose are lit, but there is virtually zero light in his eyes, which makes the eyes look "dead." Now, this is a "grab shot" in the living room. It's no formal portrait where you can control everything. It's a candid. But if you have some PP skill you can pick up some wispy brightness (I would not just paint in a crisp round catchlight since there is no source for it) in the eyes to give them some life, and then, for a grab-candid, it is not bad at all. :thumbup:
Mama is correct that the focus is a hair back—i.e.... (show quote)


Thank you for looking and giving me your thoughts here. I don't usually shoot people because even my candid shots have always come out bad in the past. Since I've been shooting for a couple years now, I figured I'd give something new a try.

I'm not experienced in photographing people and not good with lighting yet. I purposely wanted to try low light and people.

This was taken in the hospital last night in pre-op. The lighting is certainly not made for photography. I took my camera to experiment and learn while I waited. My brother was having surgery. This is his 16 year old son. He looked a bit worried and deep in thought. I liked the pose, but obviously couldn't move the stinkin' lights. It was a learning experience with lighting.

Thanks again.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 16:43:54   #
Country's Mama wrote:
I like the expression you have captured here. The composition is pleasing, though I am not a fan of cropping tops of heads off, I seem to be in the minority. Your focus on download appears to be his eyebrows instead of his eyes. The white light on the right especially draws your eye away from him, that on the left does also though to a lesser degree. I would tone it down or get rid of it.
I also see some noise on download. This may or may not be a distraction for you.


Thank you for looking and commenting, Mama. I'm not a fan of head cropping either. This was unintentional, although it doesn't really bother me. Focus wise, I'm still getting use to using my focus properly on this camera. I think I'm focusing on the eyes and then it turns out the camera is not lol. I think the noise might be from the ISO being bumped up do to the low light situation. The bright light to the right does distract for me and I think I'll try toning it down. I named this Deep Thinker. He just looked lost in thought.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 16:27:56   #
Ok, here's what I see.....It appears to me that the cut off claw shot has a better shot of the eye (because the other shot has the eye in shadow), however, the cut off claw shot doesn't seem to be as sharp as the other shot.

If I shot these, I'd keep them, but I'd keep trying for something I was more happy with. I've never seen hawks where I live, so I'd be happy with either of these in my keeper file.

I don't know if this crop works or not, but this is what I was thinking.

I wish the hawk had been facing the other direction, but we can't control that. I also wish there wasn't a shadow over the eye in the one picture.

I think I would try to get more shots. I like my birds to have the feathers in sharp focus. I'm not usually successful in getting the eye and the feathers sharp in the same picture.


Go to
Nov 20, 2013 15:01:17   #
Clicksy wrote:
This is a photo of my beautiful niece. I am very new to portrait photography and hope that you all can offer advice on where I went wrong/right with this shot.
I used natural light and 2 soft boxes. My darling niece didn't allow a lot of time as there were more urgent matters to deal with..... Bottle and sleep. I hope to get a lot more practice and improve where I can with all of the advice given.
Many thanks &#128516;


I'm not a portrait photographer and in fact I rarely photograph people. However, the only thing that I don't like is the color of the lighting. It seems cold to me. I like Wendy's color change. With her warming up the photo, I say it's a winner.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 14:53:13   #
Can up post the download version so we can get a good look at it?

I'd like to see the one with the clear eye and cut off claw. Maybe you could crop it attractively?
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 14:40:47   #
People are not my typical subjects. I decided to try and shoot subjects I don't normally work with for the next few months. This is just one of a few I shot yesterday.

Let me have it. :)


Go to
Nov 20, 2013 09:40:38   #
Heirloom Tomato wrote:
I'm not posting this as a good photo. Go ahead and laugh all you want. It's not really a photo anymore. I am attempting to find and learn the many tools and features tucked away in PSE12.

Saw a sunburst-shaped oil stain yesterday and wondered if it was possible to turn it into a good-looking photo. The answer was NO, but I used it as "scrap canvas" to play with star-shaped brushes, supplied frames, the star-burst effect and other doo-dads. I am going to learn to use all of this program. It will take more odd experiments, but I am on a mission. Please excuse me if I post weird test photos from time to time.
I'm not posting this as a good photo. Go ahead and... (show quote)


I think it looks kind of neat. I look forward to seeing your other 'experiments'.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 09:26:53   #
The phone is my favorite. I do this all the time and just throw the shots away because I feel no one would like them. You've made me re-think that.
Go to
Nov 20, 2013 09:21:46   #
vinnya wrote:
Its the East Haddam Swing Bridge over the CT river. settings Canon 7d, F/20, 30 sec. iso 100, 45mm on sigma 24 - 70


I haven't done a lot (or any serious) long exposures. Is that the reason for the sky looking "noisy"? I have a few shots where everything looks good except the sky looks "noisy" or "pixelated" (whatever the terminology), so I figured the shot was ruined. Why do I think my shots are ruined, but it doesn't ruin your shot for me. I think it's beautiful.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 68 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.