Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dickhrm
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25 next>>
Jun 26, 2013 11:50:08   #
Thanks, you've alleviated one of my concerns, i.e., that I don't necessarily have to use a tripod.

But as far as what one does to combine three (or more) bracketed images into one combined image via HDR, what software do you use?

Also, how do the results of that HDR software differ from what I somtimes do in darkening the sky and/or lightening the foreground of pix, via the selection tool in PSE 8?

Also I've used an inexpensive graduated circular density filter to achieve a similar effect, but with only limited success.

duane13 wrote:
dickhrm, The software I've been playing with will align the images, so if you have a steady subject but unsteady hands, this is not a problem. If your images are moving, you can shoot in raw, then make two copies - one over and one under, of the same image, to combine in a single HDR.
Go to
Jun 26, 2013 10:44:47   #
My camera braketing provision allows me to take three pix at different exposures - the default being one stop less light, one stop zero, and one stop one more light. But I've never tried to combine the images via HDR, for two reasons.

One is that the great majority of my pix are hand held, and I've been lead to believe that unless a person has a very steady hand, that a tripod is essential.

The other is that I've not done anything with layers, thinking it was too complex for my technology challenged self to master (I have PSE 8.)

Thanks to anyone who can encourage me to try HDR!

Radioman wrote:
*********
There is a time and a place for HDR - and for P & S cameras it is good to have the option. Most DSLR cameras have bracketing and this gives the choice of using programs such as PhotoMatrix to make a HDR final that is how YOU want it, not a camera-preset.

The big advantage of 'bracketing' is that when taking photo's of things that are moving, each of the pictures are available while in a camera that combines them into a single HDR they become blurred.
Go to
Jun 26, 2013 10:20:41   #
oops, I believe I stand corrected. I saw the Fl in your profile, and read it as FL, as in Florida, USA. But now I'm thinking you live in New Zealand, where such pretty scenes do exist!

dickhrm wrote:
Your morning bike ride - you must not be at home!? At least I've not encountered mountains when in FL..... :)
Go to
Jun 26, 2013 10:15:14   #
Your morning bike ride - you must not be at home!? At least I've not encountered mountains when in FL..... :)

Daleg wrote:
I saw some great sights on my ride
Go to
Jun 26, 2013 08:56:26   #
That's what I guessed you did, but wanted confirmation. Thanks.

mborn wrote:
I used a remote release, watch the hummer coming in and shot with continuous
Go to
Jun 26, 2013 07:00:57   #
Great pix! I'm guessing that after you set up your camera and tripod, you held the shutter part way down, waited for the bird to come into view, then clicked? Or did you set your shutter on continuous to avoid clicking a milli second after the bird came into view? Thanks.

mborn wrote:
You can use a tripod, with your feeder just focus on the area of the tip and catch the hummingbirds coming and going use you flash
Go to
Jun 24, 2013 20:47:41   #
Thanks to you and COCO1964 for your replies. Now I just need to get going and learn one more of the many aspects of photo editing that I know are available, but I've not yet tried, let alone mastered!

CajonPhotog wrote:
If PSE8 has the ability to use layers and layer masks, it is not all that hard. With your photo opened up in PSE8 duplicate the layer. At this point I always delete the original, just to make sure that I don't trash it somewhere during the editing process. Next add a clipping mask to your "copy" background layer, it should be white. Next step would be to open your new background photo and place it BELOW the background copy layer. (you will not be able to see any of your new background yet.) Next, using a BLACK paintbrush, and with the clipping mask active and selected (you will see a small border around the mask to lety you know it is selected), start painting over the areas that you want the new background to show through. If you make a mistake, switch the color to white and paint back over the mistake. The first few times it will look like c..p but in time you will like how it works. OK, so somebody fill in the blanks of what I missed.
If PSE8 has the ability to use layers and layer m... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 23, 2013 23:29:04   #
How does one so significantly change the left side of the photo? I have PSE 8 and have done some changing using the selection tool to darken, lighten, etc., a background. But how does one go about going from a very cluttered background, on the original, to that all orange one or that blue sky with clouds one on the edited version? Thanks.
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 18:04:16   #
Only problem is on line it runs $119, which is what I paid for the camera itself, i.e., my little point and shoot, that I often have on me when I don't otherwise need my SX40.

TaraMar wrote:
What Shooter was trying to tell you is that you need to overexpose by 1 to 1+2/3 stops. you don't want to go lower, you want to go higher.

Get the hoodman loupe for viewing your LCD screen in bright sunlight; it works like a charm and as others have said review your histogram as well.
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 14:57:41   #
Ok, thanks.

steve40 wrote:
Well, actually a couple of buttons, one process. :) Photoshop Elements 9, Topaz Adjust 5, button = Dynamic Pop.
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 13:26:35   #
Big improvement - so what button was it that was the cure?

>>>Anyway present photo problem solved, one button cure.>>>
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 11:06:37   #
Usually when I encounter these scenes, I'm driving somewhere, with limited time. So I simply park the car, assuming there's a safe shoulder for doing so, get out and after assessing various angles and compositions, snap away. Ten or so minutes is all I'm there.

Not only would going up to the house and asking permission be time consuming, but the answer might be no. (As the old saying goes, sometimes it's better to ask forgiveness than permission!)

Another point is that I believe folks are being increasingly leery of answering their door to unknown persons, whether or not the stranger has a camera in hand. In my case, I don't answer my door, unless someone has notified me to give me a heads up. A sad state of affairs, but in today's world almost a necessity from the standpoint of personal safety.

drj521 wrote:
Welcome back to Michigan Canoe50d. Glad to have the prodigal Michigander back :D. Legally there is no problem and, if you're not intrusive, there is no moral obligation either but I like to go up to the house and say "Hi." I find that if I have my camera in hand it's much easier to walk up to their door. If they see you approaching with a camera they'll be puzzled but not likely threatened. Most people are flattered that you find something of theirs photogenic and are all too happy to share their scenery and a story with you. I know what you are talking about when you mention farm scenes, I too am drawn to old silos, stone walls and rusty farm equipment.
Welcome back to Michigan Canoe50d. Glad to have th... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 10:08:09   #
Thanks, I'm looking forward to seeing them. If they are anywhere close to those magnificent bird pix, I'm sure to be impressed!

Carolina Wings wrote:
I must admit my Sony's were much better at landscape shots...even on auto...than my Canon SX40. I really have to work with the manual settings to get descent landscape photos. I'll post some in my next post so you can see what I mean.
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 10:04:07   #
I suspect that even in "wild west" Nevada, that most citizens are in favor of some amount of gun control. And I suspect that Harry Reid is of the same opinion, yet he's a realist, and realizes that those who most influence elections with their money and all, would go all out to defeat him, and his associates, in the next election, if he voted differently than he did.

krgatlgm wrote:
I would agree with you IF, IF the Senators and Representatives of the 200 million acutally DID represent the people but they DON'T. They represent greed and power. Just look at their salary then explain how they all become millionaires. Fire them all.

And this is a Democratic controlled Senate that couldn't pass this. Reid even voted No.
Go to
Apr 18, 2013 09:00:29   #
A bit off topic, but since you have the SX-40, I have a question. Unlike my much less expensive Canon point and shoot, which takes excellent sunrise/sunset pix with their scene setting for such pix, the SX40 has no such setting. I've experimented with different settings, but haven't come up with any satisfactory combination yet. If you use your SX40 for such scenes, what have you found to be best for taking them? Thanks.

Carolina Wings wrote:
Thank you so much for your kind words ascutney! The Cardinals were taken with my Canon SX40 bridge camera...happened to catch that Cardinal as I walked through the Cape Fear Botanical Gardens. The Bluebirds were taken with my Pentax Kx and my 55-300 lens.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.