Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Gibar
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
Nov 1, 2013 13:22:48   #
Nightski wrote:
It would be unrealistic. It is something Russ does very well. It probably isn't what the OP had in mind. I love the last crop that the OP did. That is the way I would do this photo. But, it would be interesting to see what Russ does. It would be an artsy thing.


Yes I think it would be interesting to see what Russ would do. If interested have a go at it, Russ.
Go to
Nov 1, 2013 01:47:04   #
Douglas, when I first open your image I immediately knew I was not qualified to make any C&C comments. But after reading what others had to say about it and returning to your image for my own verification I can honestly say that I came away with more knowledge than I had previous and deeper appreciation for the fine art of photography. if this section of the forum continues with this type of photographic quality and constructive C&C, where we can all glean knowledge from one another, it will definitely be a nice place to spend time in.
Go to
Nov 1, 2013 00:16:31   #
Sorry, forgot to click store original


Go to
Nov 1, 2013 00:11:13   #
I would like to truly thank everyone for taking the time to comment on this post. Your comments are truly appreciated and your c&c have me to look at this image in many different ways, again thank you.

As I mentioned in my original post that i was interested in receiving feedback on the composition amongst other things. I too thought that the industrial plant in the background is distracting.

Even though they are separated by almost 2 miles, the aircraft and the plant ending up on the same plain and along with the compression of the telephoto lens, visibly compressing the distance between the plane and the plant resulting in a not so pleasing effect.

So applying many of your suggestions, here is the revised version for your consideration. Cropped the image so the horizon is on the top one third line, remove the vignetting, attempted to even out the sky, and warm the image slightly. Your thoughts between the two images would be appreciated.
Thank you


Go to
Oct 31, 2013 17:42:14   #
Shot with Canon 5D Mark ll, with 100 to 400 lens at 400 mm
1/320 second @ F11 ISO 200.

Shot on heavy overcast day, with sun trying to peek out on western horizon. I've tried replacing the sky was one of more interest but nothing I have tried seemed to complement the tone and mood of this image. I realize that the sky is boring, but I am more interested in getting feedback on the composition, along with any other pros or cons in regard to this shot. thank you.


Go to
Oct 31, 2013 02:19:24   #
According to Apples web site, that the majority of the Mavericks installs, install with out a hitch, but a minority are reporting data loss as well as other problems.
I will probably what for an update or two.
Go to
Oct 31, 2013 01:21:14   #
Just received this email from Western Digital.
Has any one else received one?
I have not upgraded to Mavericks yet, but have been thinking about it. With this news, I will be putting that idea on hold, suggest others do the same.


***** PLEASE DO NOT REPY TO THIS EMAIL ****

Dear WD Registered Customer,

As a valued WD customer we want to make you aware of new reports of Western Digital and other external HDD products experiencing data loss when updating to Apple's OS X Mavericks (10.9). WD is urgently investigating these reports and the possible connection to the WD Drive Manager, WD Raid Manager and WD SmartWare software applications. Until the issue is understood and the cause identified, WD strongly urges our customers to uninstall these software applications before updating to OS X Mavericks (10.9), or delay upgrading. If you have already upgraded to Mavericks, WD recommends that you remove these applications and restart your computer.

The WD Drive Manager, WD Raid Manager, and WD SmartWare software applications are not new and have been available from WD for many years, however solely as a precaution WD has removed these applications from our website as we investigate this issue. .

Sincerely,
Western Digital
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 15:50:41   #
Nightski wrote:
Okay, everyone, it looks like we are going to have our new gallery. We are currently working out the details, and we will present it when Admin is satisfied with what we have come up with.

Thank you, Everyone!! We did it! Now let's work hard to make it work!


We'll done!!!
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 14:55:50   #
what a beautiful set, like #1the best. Very interesting capture .
Go to
Oct 24, 2013 18:43:24   #
Alpha wrote:
I got sucked into this through a Google ad. The ad said "Canon vs Nikon - UglyHedgehog.com - Which is better? Here is the truth one of them doesn't want you to know"
But all I received was the opportunity to subscribe to the newsletter and join the forum.
Where is the piece that addresses "Canon vs Nikon - Which is better? Here is the truth one of them doesn't want you to know"??


Welcome to hog. Many members on this site are very passionate towards their choice of gear and others will defend their opinion to the death. So stick around and enjoy the good, the bad, and of course the ugly.
Go to
Oct 23, 2013 19:16:59   #
Photographer Jim wrote:
Most of us on the UHH forum came here for reasons. We have an interest in the wonderful activity of photography, enjoy discussing the activity with others of like interest, and hope to learn new things that will increase our understanding. As on any public forum, those who participate will bring with them a variety of experiences and knowledge; sometimes extensive, sometimes minimal.

Anyone who has spent very much time here is aware that others new to the forum or photography may post questions that have been discussed many times before, or will ask their question in a very general and imprecise manner. When that happens, we can react in one of two ways. We can allow ourselves to be annoyed and chastise the person for not having done a search and/ or not providing all of the pertinent information needed for a complete answer, or we can recognize that the person may not realize that their question is too vague or general and help them get to a more complete understanding of both their own question and the answer which may follow.

As an example, if a person asks, "I'm new to photography, want to add a better lens to my kit, so which is the best lens for me to buy?" I see no real purpose in allowing myself to be annoyed or in jumping on that person for the simplicity of their question. Rather, I start with the assumption that they may not realize what additional info is needed for another to be able to provide a helpful answer. I assume that they are not yet knowledgable or experienced enough to know that some lens are better suited for a particular type of photography, or that the spectrum of lens may vary greatly in both quality and cost, far beyond what they are aware of. Rather than belittle them for their imprecision, it makes much more sense to gently let them know what information would be needed. Hopefully, they will get to a reasonable answer and will have gained some perspective as to which factors have bearing on their question, and why, along the way.

All questions, no matter how simply, are the starting point of a path to increased knowledge. Focusing on the mannerism which the question was asked is throwing up an unnecessary detour, which in the long run may convince the asker that they should not ask any questions at all.

My advice is that if one does not have the patience to provide answers without also voicing their annoyance for those with less experience or knowledge, it would be better to ignore the questions, hold your tongue, and quietly exist within your own world of negativity.
Most of us on the UHH forum came here for reasons.... (show quote)


Bravo! Well written :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 23, 2013 16:36:49   #
PalePictures wrote:
Beware JeepDaddy.

I have a MAC 1,1 produced in 2006.
The graphics card is a 500MB Graphic card.

Notes.

YOu can not run a operating system greater than 10.7 on this machine. If you try to purchase it online from apple, they won't allow it. You get a message that the operating system is incompatible with your machine.
Notice on the attachment that I have two processor quad core system.

Secondly. 3D effects in Adobe Photoshop won't work on a machine that doesn't have a gig of video RAM. I cannot use 3D effects like "Render lighting Effects" on my MAC PRO. I can do it on my MACBOOK PRO.. Its a current MACBOOK PRO.

I have elected not to get the new MAC PRO but get an IMAC with a Fusion DRIVE instead. According to MAC Rumors there upgrading them to the Processors soon.
If I were you I would wait. That's what I'm doing.

Just be cautious. The little quirks above are not advertised. If you don't ask the right question you may end up with some unpleasant surprises.

Russ Elkins
Beware JeepDaddy. br br I have a MAC 1,1 produced... (show quote)

Computer years are measured like dog years 7:1, so that makes your Mac 49 years old. It will qualify for mandatory retirement, in the next couple of years.
One way of looking at it.
Go to
Oct 23, 2013 16:10:07   #
haroldross wrote:
http://www.apple.com/apple-events/october-2013/

I believe he left out the 's' in events.


Thanks Haroldross for fixing the link.
Go to
Oct 23, 2013 14:12:45   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
Is OSX Mavericks the newest? What are the numbers for Mavericks?

Maverick is the latest and greatest operating system from apple,and it is free.
Check out
apple.com/apple-event/october-2013/
It over a hour long, but worth the watch.
Go to
Oct 12, 2013 09:03:13   #
rebride wrote:
You sure assume a lot. Making up situations and all.
Perhaps you should read d800enu2it's biography.
" I am 62 and just retired and starting to learn photography. And I like your forum"
Not sure how much d800enu2it still likes this forum after you grossly hijack
the topic.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.