Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ScottWardwell
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 28 next>>
Feb 11, 2023 18:46:48   #
DI Seller wrote:
I purchased a Nikon Z6II and a Nikkor lens about a month ago. I just learned that Nikon will not be permitting Z lenses to be made by third-party vendors (i.e. tamron, sigma, et al). I know Nikon makes great glass, but they are expensive, as everyone knows. So now I'm faced with keeping the Nikon or returning it for what was my close 2nd choice, a Sony a7iii. As some one here on UHH mentioned to me, there are a great many 3rd party Sony lenses. While I realize I could purchase the Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ II, it is $250.00 on top of the cost of whatever lenses I might buy. You may also sacrifice some lens functions with the when using other lenses with the adapter. I don't have a big budget for extra glass. I shoot pretty much everything, regardless of its nature (i.e. landscape, portrait, fast moving subjects and so on). I'm pressed for time so I need you input ASAP. Please, please no lectures, just advice. Many, many thanks.
I purchased a Nikon Z6II and a Nikkor lens about ... (show quote)


I don't see why you must have native Z-glass when there is a whole universe of Nikon F-glass that will adapt to your Z6 with full functionality with the same image quality it had before and at greatly discounted prices if you shop wisely. Nikon's supposed partial-ban on third-party glass should have no practical impact on you enjoying your Z6II.
Stop worrying about how Nikon's action is going to effect your market options. Look at the legacy F-mount as just as good as anything a third-party brand might create. You are right about Z-glass sky-high costs.
For the next few years, it will remain probably the best system that most of us will never own.
Unless you are a working professional who feels he must have the latest; just relax.
Typical Tempest-In-A-Teapot delivered courtesy of YouTube.
Go to
Feb 11, 2023 18:33:58   #
DaveO wrote:
No, you've proven yourself to be dumber, so keep up the good work!


ZOOM - Right over your head.
Go to
Feb 11, 2023 15:29:47   #
DaveO wrote:
Hmmmm, that would be you!


Too subtle for you?
Go to
Feb 11, 2023 03:32:39   #
dirtpusher wrote:
A flash poll of SOTU watchers by CNN found that Biden's speech was a major hit.


Only among those who are dumber-than-dirt.
Go to
Feb 8, 2023 12:05:29   #
scooter1 wrote:
Let me help you with your memory since yours seems to be failing. The first interaction between you and I on this post was by you attacking me, or at least trying to. The fact you're crying foul when you "struck the first blow" is like Biden thinking he's actually president. Doesn't hold water and it "makes you look the worse"??


Speaking of failing memory; the Secret Service issued a Silver Alert for Biden. Last seen babbling incoherently at the podium.
Go to
Jan 5, 2023 03:47:06   #
trapper1 wrote:
Mr. Wardwell and Mr. ID, please take your arguments to some other website. This has been a terreific boon to me, and probably to other newbies. You are denigrating the efforts of all those who posted really good advice that is really helpful. Your arguments between the two of you are of zero interest to others who are really helping UHH so pleasse comtinue your disagreements on some othe venue, it is merely disruptive on UHH.

E L. Shapiro, it is really a treat to see you posting your always interesting comments and advice. Hope you post a lot more, your posts are like taking money to a bank.

Trapper1
Mr. Wardwell and Mr. ID, please take your argument... (show quote)

I appreciate your sentiments but your concern is really with UserID. Please read the thread again.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 19:30:04   #
Ava'sPapa wrote:
Beautiful panorama! You obviously know what you're doing!


Thank you.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 15:49:01   #
joecichjr wrote:
A gloriously beautiful panorama that would make a good dictionary picture to illustrate "serenity" 💙✨💙✨💙


Thank you Joe.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 15:33:14   #
User ID wrote:
Can grant you that ! You really have a "consistent body of work". Its a whole bunch of boring empty fake panoramas that all look more or less alike. They may even sell well in tourist traps, being just the right shape for that empty wall over someones sofa.


Thanks. You keep making my point.
That is Searsport on Rt. 1, looking south over Penobscot Bay. The clouds are over my hometown island of Islesboro a couple miles to the south. The sun is setting way to the right casting that pink glow on those clouds. It is low tide and you make out people walking on the rock and seaweed.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 14:36:21   #
User ID wrote:
Can grant you that ! You really have a "consistent body of work". Its a whole bunch of boring empty fake panoramas that all look more or less alike. They may even sell well in tourist traps, being just the right shape for that empty wall over someones sofa.


You are right in one regard, they are selling. Sold two as Christmas gifts from people I met at an art show in September at Fly-In in Greenville. In discussion with a dentist to decorate his new practice. Lots of blank wall space to fill.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 14:23:58   #
User ID wrote:
I already looked at your work. Theres nothing to say about it cuz theres no "there" there. Mostly empty and badly underexposed fake panoramas.

I dont keep a "portfolio". Thaz for wanabees. My work is everywhere, nothing to hide. Your posted images really align quite perfectly with your posted texts.

Time to return to your beloved Attic where youll be amongst your peers.


You are right; it is everywhere. Like Chlamydia.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 14:13:42   #
User ID wrote:
I already looked at your work. Theres nothing to say about it cuz theres no "there" there. Mostly empty and badly underexposed fake panoramas.

Time to return to your beloved Attic where youll be amongst your peers.


Well, I for one am waiting to see your "cohesive body of work". If it exists at all?
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 13:55:57   #
User ID wrote:
Thaz your reaction to being dead wrong? A Pure UHH "expert" on display.

"Real Science" ? ROTFLMFAO. Looks too much like "You Tube" science to all of us who actually know better.


Fine. When you are prepared to be civil and want to compare portfolios; pull your head out of your ass first.
Go to
Jan 4, 2023 07:31:30   #
User ID wrote:
That is contrary to Right Practice.
Wherever did you get that, from a youtube "expert" ?


No nimrod. Practical experience and real science. But if you want to do otherwise, knock yourself out. UHH is equal opportunity when it comes to catering to all delusions.
Go to
Jan 3, 2023 18:10:30   #
Make sure you are not threading filters and rings made of dissimilar materials. The greatest chance of locking them together is if one is plastic or aluminum being mated to brass. Pick a reputable brand that makes their own rings of the same material their filters are built from.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 28 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.