amehta wrote:
I think the photographer, camera, and lens should be of comparable quality for the most efficient results. If on is much weaker than the others, it needs to be upgraded to match the others. If one is much stronger than the others, it will generally be wasted.
The best photographer will not create masterpieces with poor equipment. And Tiger Woods will not win the Masters with average clubs. :-)
You alway have the best answers. Thanks.