Keenan wrote:
No, John, please don't play stupid. I've explained this to you and others here at least half a dozen times myself, and others have gone over it many many times, regarding they ways that Republicans have designed and administered the "v**er ID" laws which purposely disenfranchised large numbers of legal v**ers, by picking and choosing which forms of ID would be acceptable (like gun permits are mostly Republican v**ers), and which ones would not be acceptable (like Student ID's which are more Democrat v**ers). Closing state ID offices in Democrat areas, to coincide with the new v**er ID laws, refusing to inform the public properly ahead of time, making the communications about the changes purposely confusing, and many other tactics that, together, make it very clear about the true purpose of many of these "v**er ID laws" being to suppress Democrat v**es in disproportionate numbers rather than the stated purpose of the laws. And just in case any questions remained as to what the true purpose was, there have been a whole slew of Republicans who have publicly admitted that the true purpose was to give the Republican Party the advantage in e******ns.
You are exhausting, John, asking the same questions over and over and over again over the last 6 months. Why do you need people to have to go over this again and again and again for you? Is it because you keep forgetting this information?
No, John, please don't play stupid. I've explained... (
show quote)
Yes, you've trotted out this same patronizing "explanation" several times in the past and when questioned for any sources to verify your "explanation" you seem unable to provide the verification you so vociferously demand of everyone else. I think you did come up with ONE example of a woman who was so old her records had been lost. ONE. Which I'm sure has been resolved by now.
The only thing "exhausting" here is you parroting the same party line over and over ad nauseum.