Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: skylane5sp
Page: <<prev 1 ... 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 ... 706 next>>
May 27, 2016 17:05:00   #
dirtpusher wrote:
Lol just one more thing fee yuh to lie about. Caliber boi


WTF are you spewing about now? What lie? Apparently you are of the belief that the "repukes" control the FBI?

And I've got your caliber, boi. Got to shoot a .505 Gibbs last Sunday. Holy crap on a c*****r!
Go to
May 27, 2016 13:25:03   #
dirtpusher wrote:
Just more antics by repukes who are afraid of her.


I had no idea that "repukes" controlled the FBI. Please, tell us more...
Go to
May 27, 2016 11:36:20   #
RaeRae wrote:
Just asking the question???


He keeps trying but is still and will always be just one more bong hit away from true enlightenment...
Go to
May 26, 2016 13:31:57   #


OK. Got it...

We need a sarcasm font.
Go to
May 26, 2016 13:24:39   #
silver wrote:
I really think that rac is descending into depression and madness. He is isolating himself and he lives in a deluded dream world.


Yet you seem to follow him around and hang on his every word. What's up with that?
Go to
May 26, 2016 13:18:30   #
Is there any discernible point to this inane post?
Go to
May 26, 2016 13:12:31   #
Keenan wrote:
No, John, please don't play stupid. I've explained this to you and others here at least half a dozen times myself, and others have gone over it many many times, regarding they ways that Republicans have designed and administered the "v**er ID" laws which purposely disenfranchised large numbers of legal v**ers, by picking and choosing which forms of ID would be acceptable (like gun permits are mostly Republican v**ers), and which ones would not be acceptable (like Student ID's which are more Democrat v**ers). Closing state ID offices in Democrat areas, to coincide with the new v**er ID laws, refusing to inform the public properly ahead of time, making the communications about the changes purposely confusing, and many other tactics that, together, make it very clear about the true purpose of many of these "v**er ID laws" being to suppress Democrat v**es in disproportionate numbers rather than the stated purpose of the laws. And just in case any questions remained as to what the true purpose was, there have been a whole slew of Republicans who have publicly admitted that the true purpose was to give the Republican Party the advantage in e******ns.

You are exhausting, John, asking the same questions over and over and over again over the last 6 months. Why do you need people to have to go over this again and again and again for you? Is it because you keep forgetting this information?
No, John, please don't play stupid. I've explained... (show quote)


Yes, you've trotted out this same patronizing "explanation" several times in the past and when questioned for any sources to verify your "explanation" you seem unable to provide the verification you so vociferously demand of everyone else. I think you did come up with ONE example of a woman who was so old her records had been lost. ONE. Which I'm sure has been resolved by now.

The only thing "exhausting" here is you parroting the same party line over and over ad nauseum.
Go to
May 25, 2016 10:59:59   #
Hey! That looks just like the list of Hillary's professional accomplishments.
Go to
May 20, 2016 18:32:32   #
Keenan wrote:
What part of Bill Clinton is not running for president to you not understand? And just because you keep insisting that Hillary was complicit in wh**ever alleged behavior of Bill Clinton you allege, does not make it true, no matter how many time you repeat that silly assertion. Newsflash for you: Repetition does not make something true.

Bill Clinton is not running for president. His presidency ended in January of 2000. Time to move on...


What part of Bill Clinton is a sexual predator and has been enabled for decades by his wife, Hillary Clinton, who IS running for President and demonstrates that she does NOT have any interest in victims of sexual abuse other than as a lying sound bite don't YOU understand?

You always ask for facts. When presented with facts that don't fit your agenda, they become "silly assertions". So in your world of puppies and unicorns, Hillary is a paragon of moral virtue and all of the women that have accused her and Bill are all just silly? Or is it all a nefarious GOP plot? Reagan and Bush aren't running either. Time to "move on..." correct?

Melania Trump isn't running for president either but that doesn't stop you "liberals" from taking pot shots at her. OOOOOh. She was a model and posed for pictures. OOOOh the scandal. That's really quite a stretch to even equate her professional career with that of a rapist.
Go to
May 20, 2016 17:41:59   #
Keenan wrote:
You offer mostly right wing fringe tabloid sources with no credibility.

The alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick as described in wikipedia, doesn't seem to hold much water, as she continued to support Clinton and appear at public events on his behalf, weeks after the alleged rape. Why didn't she ever file charges? Why didn't she tell anybody at the time?

Sorry, but if you think that non credible allegations like this constitute "proof", then you have a strange definition of evidence.

Then, on top of that, what the hell does that have to do with Trump or Hillary? You do realize that Bill is not running for president, don't you? What part of this do you not understand?
You offer mostly right wing fringe tabloid sources... (show quote)


Well then, just WTF is your definition of "credibility"? You're resorting to your typical "disparage the source" mentality.
Is the NY Times a "right wing fringe tabloid"?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us/politics/90s-scandals-threaten-to-erode-hillary-clintons-strength-with-women.html?_r=0
How about the Nation Review? Is that a "right wing fringe tabloid"?
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430081/she-threatened-me-juanita-broaddrick-hillarys-role-covering-bill-clinton " rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430081/she-threatened-me-juanita-broaddrick-hillarys-role-covering-bill-clinton (something buggered up this link. use the second part.)
People magazine? Another "right wing fringe tabloid"?
http://www.people.com/article/donald-trump-bill-clinton-rape-allegations-explanation

Hillary is complicit in Bill's behavior. That's what it has to do with Hillary. Are you really that naïve? That blind? You think all this is just some "right wing" bulls**t?

Wake up and smell the coffee, bucko.
Go to
May 20, 2016 16:30:10   #
Keenan wrote:
So much silly nonsense and bulls**t, so little facts...

Let me know when you have something that can be backed up with actual evidence, ok?


Just a random sampling from the internet. The only silly nonsense and bulls**t comes from you. Keep drinking the KoolAid...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations
http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/hillary-covered-up-bills-rapes-sex-with-underage-girls/
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/breaking-sex-s***e-makes-disturbing-accusations-bill-clinton/
http://www.inquisitr.com/3108141/bill-clinton-allegedly-flew-on-p*******e-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-jet-with-trafficked-girls-26-times/
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2016/05/17/networks-ignore-new-details-bill-clintons-connections
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/flight_logs_show_bill_clinton_hung_out_with_sex_offender_far_more_than_believed.html
Go to
May 20, 2016 15:54:50   #
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435393/hillary-clinton-e-mails-Cheryl-Mills-DOJ

This is beyond d********g.
Go to
May 19, 2016 13:24:13   #
dljen wrote:
Do you read items from HuffPo? MSNBC? Politicus?


Yes. You will NEVER see me dismiss something because of the source or author. Well, Dirt's politicus stretches credibility but I will at least look. And laugh...

I get a real kick out of some of the i***ts here that voice their abject refusal to read something because of the source "I'll never ready ANYTHING from faux". How stupid is that? Probably nine times out of ten, that isn't the real source of the story, they just republished someone else's story.
Go to
May 19, 2016 13:04:50   #
Keenan wrote:
The fact that you did not and in fact have never mentioned Trump's history of con artistry, s**mming, swindling, and screwing people, and the fact that he is a serial liar. tells me that you are either perfectly fine with those behavioral traits of Trump, or you choose to delude yourself of the t***h. Either way, your support of Trump is based on laughable and stunningly shallow reasoning.


Unlike your support of Clinton which is based on no reasoning of ANY depth.
Go to
May 19, 2016 12:59:26   #
Twardlow wrote:
Then you waste a lot of time.


The only waste of time is trying to get through your entrenched filtering system. Enjoy your little safe space. Don't read anything that might upset or challenge your demonstrated narrow view of the world. Don't read anything that might expand your singular thought process.

Be happy in your ignorance/stupidity.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 ... 706 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.