Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
The Tally is in! Number of Dead Democrats v****g in California Outnumber Dead Republicans V****g by Almost 2 to 1!
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
May 25, 2016 21:41:33   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
LOL!

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/05/25/report-dead-v**ers-found-v****g-california/

Reply
May 25, 2016 22:22:03   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
you mean like this..

Here in Florida we had early v****g and lots of things such as Sunday v****g to enable people to v**e. After the e******n of a liberal (and black!) president the GOP decided to dramatically reduce the ability of people to v**e and even passed laws imposing stiff fines on those who register people to v**e if they did not do it in precise ways - thus intimidating even the League of Women V**ers. Makes you wonder how anyone can think that encouraging Americans to v**e is a bad thing...

Reply
May 25, 2016 22:24:33   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
dirtpusher wrote:
you mean like this..

Here in Florida we had early v****g and lots of things such as Sunday v****g to enable people to v**e. After the e******n of a liberal (and black!) president the GOP decided to dramatically reduce the ability of people to v**e and even passed laws imposing stiff fines on those who register people to v**e if they did not do it in precise ways - thus intimidating even the League of Women V**ers. Makes you wonder how anyone can think that encouraging Americans to v**e is a bad thing...
you mean like this.. br br Here in Florida we ha... (show quote)


Source? Just some loser demonic rat's opinion or do you have something of more substance to offer?

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2016 23:03:12   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Source? Just some loser demonic rat's opinion or do you have something of more substance to offer?


lol you denying it happened. lol

Reply
May 25, 2016 23:08:36   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Source? Just some loser demonic rat's opinion or do you have something of more substance to offer?


here some

http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/letters-editor/kirchubel-got-it-wrong/

http://prospect.org/article/22-states-wave-new-v****g-restrictions-threatens-shift-outcomes-tight-races

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V**er_suppression_in_the_United_States

they going back to 1800's laws
http://lehrmaninstitute.org/history/1800.html

Reply
May 26, 2016 00:20:57   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Up to 72% of v****g democrats support v**er ID laws, so I guess Democrats also support "v**er suppression". :) https://siftingreality.com/2013/08/31/72-of-democrats-83-of-non-w****s-support-suppressing-the-minority-v**e/

Reply
May 26, 2016 00:40:24   #
green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Up to 72% of v****g democrats support v**er ID laws, so I guess Democrats also support "v**er suppression". :) https://siftingreality.com/2013/08/31/72-of-democrats-83-of-non-w****s-support-suppressing-the-minority-v**e/
wow, I've never seen that statistic before

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2016 00:45:30   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Up to 72% of v****g democrats support v**er ID laws, so I guess Democrats also support "v**er suppression". :) https://siftingreality.com/2013/08/31/72-of-democrats-83-of-non-w****s-support-suppressing-the-minority-v**e/

green wrote:
wow, I've never seen that statistic before



The crucial part of the above statistic is the "up to" part. What that means is that the poll results are vastly different depending on how the question is phrased.

Option A: "Do you support reasonable v**er ID laws in order to prevent v***r f***d as long as it is administered fairly and doesn't disenfranchise people who are legally allowed to v**e?"

Option B: "Do you support a GOP version of v**er ID law that would be designed to suppress v**es from legitimate citizens who are members of groups who predictably v**e primarily Democrat?"


Option A is where you get the 72%

Option B is where you would get approximately 0%

Reply
May 26, 2016 00:49:49   #
green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
 
Keenan wrote:
Racmanaz wrote:
Up to 72% of v****g democrats support v**er ID laws, so I guess Democrats also support "v**er suppression". :) https://siftingreality.com/2013/08/31/72-of-democrats-83-of-non-w****s-support-suppressing-the-minority-v**e/




The crucial part of the above statistic is the "up to" part. What that means is that the poll results are vastly different depending on how the question is phrased.

Option A: "Do you support reasonable v**er ID laws in order to prevent v***r f***d as long as it is administered fairly and doesn't disenfranchise people who are legally allowed to v**e?"

Option B: "Do you support a GOP version of v**er ID law that would be designed to suppress v**es from groups who predictably v**e primarily Democrat?"


Option A is where you get the 72%

Option B is where you would get approximately 0%
Racmanaz wrote: br Up to 72% of v****g democrats s... (show quote)


that's what I wanted to say but I didn't want to write all those words.

Reply
May 26, 2016 00:56:56   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
green wrote:
that's what I wanted to say but I didn't want to write all those words.


You should hire me. Does your shill contract allow you to sub-contract?

Reply
May 26, 2016 01:37:36   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Keenan wrote:
Racmanaz wrote:
Up to 72% of v****g democrats support v**er ID laws, so I guess Democrats also support "v**er suppression". :) https://siftingreality.com/2013/08/31/72-of-democrats-83-of-non-w****s-support-suppressing-the-minority-v**e/




The crucial part of the above statistic is the "up to" part. What that means is that the poll results are vastly different depending on how the question is phrased.

Option A: "Do you support reasonable v**er ID laws in order to prevent v***r f***d as long as it is administered fairly and doesn't disenfranchise people who are legally allowed to v**e?"

Option B: "Do you support a GOP version of v**er ID law that would be designed to suppress v**es from legitimate citizens who are members of groups who predictably v**e primarily Democrat?"


Option A is where you get the 72%

Option B is where you would get approximately 0%
Racmanaz wrote: br Up to 72% of v****g democrats s... (show quote)


Pure Bulls**t, where did you pull this from? Totally fabricated questions, the fact is that both democrats and republicans support v**er laws, it is only progressives and their spin machines that don't support them, they support v***r f***d.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2016 01:56:00   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Pure Bulls**t, where did you pull this from? Totally fabricated questions, the fact is that both democrats and republicans support v**er laws, it is only progressives and their spin machines that don't support them, they support v***r f***d.


Pure Bulls**t. Why would Democrats support a bulls**t version of "v**er ID" laws designed and administered by Republicans in order to give their own party the advantage and suppress Democrat v**es? You know that no rational person would believe that Democrats would support tinkering with the system in order to give the advantage to the GOP. Why would you even suggest such nonsense? Get serious, Blurry. I'm trying to stay civil with you, but you are making it really hard when you traffic in such obvious bulls**t like this.

Reply
May 26, 2016 02:00:14   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
Am I to understand that it is only Democrat v**ers that are incapable of presenting legal ID? I guess you just proved to me and everyone else that Democrats are not to bright or successful.

Reply
May 26, 2016 02:09:56   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
letmedance wrote:
Am I to understand that it is only Democrat v**ers that are incapable of presenting legal ID? I guess you just proved to me and everyone else that Democrats are not to bright or successful.


No, John, please don't play stupid. I've explained this to you and others here at least half a dozen times myself, and others have gone over it many many times, regarding they ways that Republicans have designed and administered the "v**er ID" laws which purposely disenfranchised large numbers of legal v**ers, by picking and choosing which forms of ID would be acceptable (like gun permits are mostly Republican v**ers), and which ones would not be acceptable (like Student ID's which are more Democrat v**ers). Closing state ID offices in Democrat areas, to coincide with the new v**er ID laws, refusing to inform the public properly ahead of time, making the communications about the changes purposely confusing, and many other tactics that, together, make it very clear about the true purpose of many of these "v**er ID laws" being to suppress Democrat v**es in disproportionate numbers rather than the stated purpose of the laws. And just in case any questions remained as to what the true purpose was, there have been a whole slew of Republicans who have publicly admitted that the true purpose was to give the Republican Party the advantage in e******ns.

You are exhausting, John, asking the same questions over and over and over again over the last 6 months. Why do you need people to have to go over this again and again and again for you? Is it because you keep forgetting this information?

Reply
May 26, 2016 03:58:31   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
Because I do not agree with you. Plain and simple.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.