Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Toment
Page: <<prev 1 ... 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 next>>
Jul 20, 2015 22:35:45   #
I got an 18-55 with my a6000 which is better than than my 18-55 kit lens from Canon for the SL1 but the 55-210 Sony is MUCH better than the Tamron 28-300 that I had for the little Canon. Looking at an 18-200 SEL for travel and walk around.
Go to
Jul 20, 2015 13:46:37   #
chaprick wrote:
Don't switch!!!!!!


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Jul 20, 2015 13:32:52   #
Let's all remember guys and gals, it's NOT the shoes.....
Go to
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Jul 19, 2015 19:54:34   #
Thanks!
Go to
Jul 19, 2015 19:38:22   #
JimH123 wrote:
I bought my 18-200 used at KEH and paid less than the cost of a new one. Its in perfect condition and I love it.

In testing them, the 18-200 is sharper than the 55 to 210, but the 55-210 is still reasonably good. As I mentioned before, there are 3 versions of this 18-200 lens and the cheapest is not known for its sharpness. I have the middle, silver version. I think it has the same optics as the more expensive one.

One thing that is very noticeable is the impact of Image Stabilization. If I am looking at something at 200mm, I can see it dance all over the screen as I hand hold it. As soon as I depress the shutter half way, the Stabilization kicks on and suddenly the image is steady. I am seeing this effect more with the 18-200 lens than the other lenses I have.
I bought my 18-200 used at KEH and paid less than ... (show quote)

Which "version" did you get of the 18-200? Have you seen the 18-105?
Go to
Jul 18, 2015 09:15:27   #
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Canon support is beyond excellent, in my experience.

Mike


Had my G12 fixed with no hassle
They even took care of the shipping
Very good service
Go to
Jul 18, 2015 08:26:33   #
tomeveritt wrote:
You don't need new lenses as much as practice. Since you like landscapes, You don't have a Wide Angle! My favorite is the Tokina 11-16, AT X 116.

Your current lenses cover most of which you will ever shoot, go out and have fun with the camera.
:thumbup:


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Jul 14, 2015 13:48:31   #
Canon g12
Older model, OVF, 12MP great IQ
Cheap used-see DP review
Go to
Jul 14, 2015 12:18:51   #
Not sure SX50 is pocket size, but that's my opinion
Look at RX100's from Sony
http://www.yahoo.com/tech/sonys-new-pocket-cam-is-great-but-is-it-worth-123758419009.html
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 12:41:31   #
Great idea- will follow..
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 12:39:14   #
Searcher wrote:
I took this image several years ago, and thanks to my policy of non-purge, I still have it.

I'm not an artist so I would value your opinions, good, bad or downright ugly.


Downloaded image is perfect! Well done, great story!
Go to
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Jul 13, 2015 12:17:23   #
I
RRS wrote:
If I was in your shoes I'd be shooting about half the shots in manual focus, unless you have the money to go back again next week! With your camera and lens set to f/9 you should have more then enough for a DOF to produce very sharp images.

So here's some simple steps. Look at what you are shooting, it sill or moving, this will help you decide on a shutter speed. Do you want everything in focus or do you want a portrait with soft backgrounds. If things are fairly still as you have shown then a shutter speed of 1/125 to 1/250 sec should work if you can hold your camera steady. Your choice of F/9 should be fine for daylight. NOW look at your light meter , if it is above or below center by 1/3 of a stop I wouldn't worry but if you are way above or below the center then adjust your ISO to bring the light meter to the center. There is one other option that can be used and that's auto ISO. Set the camera to auto ISO and you should get more "keepers". As for the focus, if you have single point then use it, multi point focusing will focus on the closest thing in the frame, not necessarily what you want. If that lens has "VR" then by all means use it too. As I said if you still can't get clear images even using the large JPEG then manually focus. Hope this helps and have a grand time over there...Ron
If I was in your shoes I'd be shooting about half ... (show quote)


Good advice!
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 11:33:58   #
I have a great Ravelli, but the pistol grip head was loose when I tried to screw it down to the base plate. Apparently, a rubber washer on the plate on the tripod was missing. A cut up lg. rubber band with double face tape did the trick!
Go to
Jul 13, 2015 11:20:55   #
Pretty, Photosmoke!
Go to
Jul 11, 2015 11:33:33   #
Aw, take 'em both and be done with it! You'll be glad you did.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 next>>
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.