Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jburlinson
Page: <<prev 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 next>>
Mar 11, 2016 15:11:37   #
MT Shooter wrote:

There is a big difference in firmware updates to cameras and lenses.


Yes, there is. Firmware updates to lenses are recalls -- as in "your equipment doesn't work as well as it could, so you need to bring(send) it in to us to get it fixed." That is a recall, which by any other name still doesn't smell so sweet.
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 15:07:03   #
davyboy wrote:
I to am interested in buying this camera. keep us up to date I use all panasonic. fz200 and G6


Same for me. I have an EM-5, but most of my lenses are panasonic -- so I'm particularly interested in the GX-8, with its extra resolution. Eager to hear about your experiences and see some shots.
Go to
Mar 8, 2016 13:11:14   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Maybe YOU should actually READ that link. It is for a "firmware" update. Nowhere does it say "recall", that word has been used by no one but YOU. NOWHERE can you show a notice of recall as no firmware update constitutes a recall, from anyone!


Firmware updates can be done at home with nothing more than a computer and a thumb drive or SD card. When you have to box up your equipment and ship it somewhere -- that's a recall, whatever the manufacturer chooses to call it. "Firmware update" is just a safer, gentler term that doesn't risk spooking the faithful.

"My engine bursts into flame when I turn the key in the ignition -- what should I do?" -- "Take it to the dealership for a 'firmware update'".
Go to
Mar 4, 2016 15:44:41   #
woodsliv wrote:

What do you Pentax users think of the K7?


Just a couple of suggestions. Number one -- shoot in RAW and then customize a noise reduction profile for use in post production. JPEGs are just too noisy, especially at high ISO (>800).

Number two -- in bright light, drop exposure compensation a third of a stop. Otherwise you'll be clipping a lot of highlights.

Otherwise, very, very solid camera -- and compact, especially for its time, with very good ergonomics, IMO.
Go to
Feb 27, 2016 15:14:41   #
Shutterslug wrote:

My price range is under $500. Preferably lower.


For under $500 you could get a brand new Pentax K-50 with TWO new weather resistant zoom lenses (18- 55mm and 50-200 mm). Compared to the d3300, you would get: focus peaking, bigger pixels, in-camera image stabilization, more cross-type AF points, faster shutter speeds, higher ISO, and an anti-aliasing filter to cut down on moire. Plus compatibility with decades of Pentax k-mount lenses of top-flight quality.

Just saying.
Go to
Feb 19, 2016 16:23:27   #
jro1010 wrote:
Does anyone have more info about what's going on with this? Please let me know. I had found one of them, but I wouldn't buy it if there is such an issue. Thanks! jro


Apparently, this limited recall applies only to cameras with serial numbers falling between 6310198 and 6311127. If you have such a camera, you can call 1-239-245-6360 in the US and arrange for the camera to be inspected and repaired if necessary. The company says that this inspection service will be offered through the end of March 2018.

The problem seems to be "light leakage" -- "unwanted light" (overexposure?) under extremely bright conditions. Here's Sony's advisory:

http://esupport.sony.com/US/p/news-item.pl?news_id=499&mdl=DSCRX1RM2
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 14:33:43   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
I am not a marketing expert. Nikon people generally stick with Nikon unless they switch to Cannon or some other brand. The key will be the features and what manufacturer Pentax is taking aim at.


As a long time Pentaxian, I'd be surprised if Pentax was seriously targeting CanNikon users. A full-frame Pentax has been a mirage for many years -- a long-standing promise to a fan base thirsting for a reason to stay with their brand for just a little while longer. In the meantime, Ricoh's been upgrading their crop sensor models sensibly -- with both IQ and value for money uppermost in their priorities.

But I think it's been tough to hold the line against the mirrorless invasion -- especially the full-frame mirrorless. The FF Pentax is necessity to keep loyalists from jumping ship to the Sonys.
Go to
Feb 8, 2016 13:42:38   #
camerapapi wrote:

In his late years he abandoned the large format to embrace medium format for which he used a Hasselblad camera.


He also championed Polaroid photography. Here's one of many he shot with his SX-70 in 1979.


Go to
Feb 3, 2016 16:02:32   #
marram101 wrote:
I'm not sure whether to buy the Olympus OM D E M5 or
the E M5 Mark11? B&H is selling the E M5 at under $400.


If you can get a brand new original EM5 from a reputable dealer at under $400, jump on that deal!

If you like to put your camera on a tripod and take lots of pictures of still life or stationary subjects and then make prints >20 inches wide, then the Mark II is good value for money. Otherwise, the original plus a good portrait/macro lens would cost the same and give you a lot more pleasure.

Just my opinion.
Go to
Feb 1, 2016 14:19:12   #
burkphoto wrote:


And we don't friggin' CARE whether they were made on film or with a digital camera, or whether they were made with a Nikon or a Canon (or any other brand) camera. We're too caught up in what we SEE to care about the technology.



With respect, that may be a nice sound bite and a cry from the heart, but it isn't really true. Consider this website: just sample the posts from the most active threads on UHH and tag them either "cares about the technology" or "doesn't care about the technology". The "cares" will outnumber the "don't cares" about 10 to 1.
Go to
Jan 5, 2016 19:38:28   #
Dewman wrote:

Just for S&G's, what are your favorite Pentax lenses? Let's not include third-party lenses at this point.... just Pentax-branded lenses.



Well, the one I use most often is my walk-around -- Pentax DA 18-135mm. If I need something faster, out comes my Pentax 31mm F/1.8 FA Limited and I start using my feet.
Go to
Jan 5, 2016 17:55:16   #
In the film world, I happily used a Minolta xd-11. When it came time to go digital, I quickly lost patience with Sony's fumbling efforts to come up with something decent that would take my Minolta lenses; so I researched all the dslr brands then available (Nikon, Canon, Olympus, etc.) and decided on the Pentax (100d) for these reasons: price, in-body stablization, lens compatibility, good 3rd party lens choice, and price (did I mention price?)

Since then, I've progressed up the line from K100d, to K10d (actually Samsung Gx-10 -- totally wonderful camera, BTW, which I still have), K-30, K-5iis. The only dud was the K-30, which had persistent aperture control problems. By the time I ran out of warranty (and patience), it was easier (and cheaper) to jump to the K-5 iis.

I now use a K-S2, because it's the one Pentax model that has an articulating lcd monitor and I don't like getting down on the ground any more. So, after all these years, I find myself using the "entry level" camera again -- and loving it!
Go to
Dec 21, 2015 16:13:06   #
Toxdoc8 wrote:
As requested here is an example of one of he illustrations


There's nothing like a picture of an outhouse to make the past come alive!
Go to
Dec 15, 2015 13:13:07   #
photogenic wrote:
Thank you all for the support on my "stupid question" It really helped me to feel free to ask another on something I don't understand.

I'm a Structural Engineer, if this BOZO asked how to figure a bracing system for a skyscraper I don't think I would ask him if he was "serious with the question".

Again thanks for all the answers it really helped. Next time I'll Google the question before I waste your time.


It was actually an excellent question -- because you not only got an explanation of focal length (assuming you know what "objective element" and "film plane" mean), you also got a fine demonstration of UHH in action.
Go to
Dec 14, 2015 15:06:57   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
By far the best way and fastest way it by purchasing this course from CreativeLive.com Ben Willmore is my favorite teacher and you will not have any trouble learning LR fast and easy.

http://www.creativelive.com/courses/lightroom-mastery-ben-willmore


Ben's class is certainly a good one, but for a total, start-from-scratch, newbie, it might be a little advanced.

For the genuine tyro, starting at ground zero, I'd recommend Jared Platt's creativelive course "Ligthroom for Beginners" (7 video lessons)
https://www.creativelive.com/courses/lightroom-for-beginners-jared-platt

If your pockets are a little deeper, ($100 vs. $29), Jared's class "Lightroom 101" (20 video lessons) is more detailed:
https://www.creativelive.com/courses/lightroom-101-lightroom-professor-jared-platt

Then, there's Lisa Snider "Lightroom Essentials" (40 lessons for around $80 -- a real bargain)

https://www.creativelive.com/courses/lightroom-essentials-lesa-snider

If you really want to make Lightroom hum, I'd do one (or more) of these, and then do Ben's course.

And -- bonus -- they're all discounted for the next week on a Christmas sale.

Each of the links above will take you to a preview of each course and you can decide for yourself if these classes are for you. I've enjoyed every one of the creativelive classes I've taken.

Merry Christmas.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.