Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Screamin Scott
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1285 next>>
Aug 18, 2020 08:46:32   #
Nice shots and very creative thinking in capturing them as you did !!!
Go to
Aug 18, 2020 08:44:04   #
Nice series !!! My bush is finally attracting more butterflies too.... Plus Hummingbirds and Hummingbird moths as well...
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 22:18:41   #
The older I get, the farther South I go... I am originally from Wisconsin. About 200 miles Northwest of Green Bay. It's easier to stay cool in Summer than stay warm in Winter... My youngest moved to Montana 3 years ago. We only visit him in the Summer. My wife lived in Canada for a while and she feels the same...
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 14:51:41   #
A few older images from years back...

2016
On Leaves by Scott, on Flickr

2018
A Pair by Scott, on Flickr
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 13:02:32   #
amfoto1 wrote:
While I've had a couple of them over the years, I am not certain.... Aren't all the Micro-Nikkor 55mm "only" 1:2 on their own, requiring some sort of extension to achieve full 1:1 I am not sayin' that a lens has to shoot 1:1 to be considered a macro lens. A lot of them over the years... and quite a few right now... are "only" 1:2. So I'm not holding this against the Micro-Nikkor 55mm lenses.... just noting it, since it might be a consideration depending upon what you're shooting.

I would never presume to tell you "all you need is the 105mm". In fact, it entirely depends upon what you're shooting close up. Out in the field and particularly if using it on an APS-C camera, a lens in the 90/100/105 range might be the most versatile... a good choice. I know a 100mm is my "most used". (Note: I shoot Canon mostly, and their 100 Macro lenses can optionally be fitted with a tripod ring, which is essential in my opinion.)

But there are times and places where a shorter or longer macro focal length is helpful or even necessary. When I'm shooting small products in studio, I use short focal length specifically so I can reach out to arrange the subject while observing it through the viewfinder or on the rear LCD screen. 35mm, 40mm or 55mm may also be necessary for some copy work. OTOH, when shooting critters that sting or bite, I sometimes choose to use a 180mm lens. But for other subjects the shorter lens puts me too close... while the longer focal length is more difficult to keep steady or renders too shallow depth of field.

Another consideration might be if wanting the lens to serve dual purpose.... such as a 55mm f/2.8 for the slightly larger aperture that can better double as an everyday "normal" lens than a 55mm f/3.5. Or, a 60mm or 90mm that you also like to use for portraiture.

I don't know if you need 40mm, two 55mm (one f/2.8, one f/3.5), and a 60mm... those are all pretty close to each other. Likewise 90mm, 105mm serve similar purpose.

But I have to admit I use:

- 45mm (tilt shift)
- 60mm (crop only, compact and doubles as a portrait lens thanks to f/2 aperture)
- 65mm (ultra high magnification, no less than 1X & up to 5X)
- 90mm (cheap vintage, manual focus only, 1:2)
- 100mm (most used, fitted with tripod ring)
- 180mm (also has tripod ring)

In addition, I always carry some extension tubes, so can use a lot of other lenses for close-up work or push any of the above to higher magnification.

I don't currently have one, but in the past have also had a 90mm tilt shift lens that I used with full frame camera for small product photography.

There are a lot of different types of macro and close-up photography. The lens you choose should and will be influenced by what you plan to shoot with it.
While I've had a couple of them over the years, I ... (show quote)


The AF iteration (an AF 55mm F2.8) went to life-size on it's own before being discontinued in favor of the 60mm AF Nikkor...
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 12:11:55   #
Just took an image of the Caterpillar staring it's Chrysalis....


(Download)
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 08:02:03   #
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
Oh, yeah! They are like aliens. Very cool! Are these native or introduced? I know there is a similar introduced species out West.


Native I believe...
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 08:01:04   #
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
Very nicely done. Never seen one, though I do see the adults. It was presumably wandering to find a place to make a chrysalis.


It has already started making one in the temporary container I had it in. I was getting some things for it to eat and then I noticed it had already started it's "J" on the side of the container. Oh well, I'll just have to keep an eye out on it now instead of putting it in a more acceptable (to me) container...
Go to
Aug 17, 2020 07:45:49   #
I have one. It's one of "true macro"lenses that I own. No I would not part with it. I love the colors it produces too...
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 16:53:58   #
A common buckeye caterpillar (Junonia coenia) I spotted walking across the road just now while walking the dog...


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 11:49:42   #
A terrestrial flatworm I found crawling up the frame of my front door this morning. Also called a "hammerhead" worm ( a bit easier to see in the 3rd image)... I have also posted this in the "Close Up " forum


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Aug 16, 2020 11:29:50   #
A terrestrial flatworm I found crawling up the frame of my front door this morning. Also called a "hammerhead" worm...


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Aug 14, 2020 19:23:23   #
Harvey wrote:
Have you stood infront of an a******n clinic with a "LARGE SIGN' - that reads "I'LL TAKE and Care for your Baby" if not why not?

IT is your decision that can or can not save one child.


There are lots of people wanting to adopt kids. My beef is with late term a******ns. I assume you also approve of assisted suicide, right ?
Go to
Aug 14, 2020 12:14:59   #
Daryls wrote:
HRBIEL,

It doesn't matter how many "sources" report the same thing if it is circular reporting. That really means only a single source is reporting something and all the others are simply repeating it. This is an issue intelligence analysists have to deal with all the time.

Rather than "believing" something just because a lot of folks are repeating it, look deeper into the data and come to your own conclusions. You will be better served that way.

Daryl


Very logical response...Pointing out a glaring problem with reporting...
Go to
Aug 14, 2020 11:36:21   #
AzPicLady wrote:
Thanks for the info. The top one (the stuck one) was an expensive filter - or at least expensive in my book.


The UV filter might have had an aluminum frame and thus was the reason the other got stuck. I always spin anything with treads in the opposite direction (normally counter-clockwise) before reversing them so as to avoid any cross threading...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1285 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.