I have been away from the camera updates going on around me for a couple of years. Bigger cameras, smaller cameras, full frame and now mirrorless. Seems like a race to nowhere. I've been using Leicas for over 40 years the only improvements, minimal. They offer the best of what a camera should be. A precision camera, practically indestructable with spot on metering, manual focus and with the best split image finder possible. Never had a mirror, who needs it and lenses that are among the finest in the world, barr none. They provide the means to produce any kind of image your looking too create. They are expensive but a once in a lifetime purchase makes it a small investment. I know many of you will disagree but I can go out out a 50 yr old lenses on my camera and produce outstanding images. If I want to shoot telephoto images I can use Visoflex and use it also for some of the most magnificent macro images you ever saw. If I where to live another 20 years I would still be using it and people would still wonder what camera I use to give me those wonderful images. Ok have fun, test me apart, but you all no it's true.

Actually, technically correct or not, the version he used is heard commonly in many parts of the
country. Terms, expressions and pronunciations that are technically "wrong" become "correct" over time if
they are in frequent common use. For example: Feb-u-ary, Ath-a-lete, Nu-cu-lar (now listed in
dictionaries as a correct secondary pronunciation), ek-cetera, "Hone in on..." (should be "Home in on.").
The list is long. I'm not fond of these bogus common uses, but one has to face facts. >Alan