If he were being posted as a diplomatic representative to the US, there's no question that he could be rejected. The only question in my mind is whether a case can be made that he is a diplomatic representative to the UN, not the US. While the UN and the Iranian mission are extraterritorial and outside US control, our airports, seaports and New York City and surroundings aren't.
Anyone know the relevant law here?
larrypayne wrote:
I didn't say Admin didn't have a right to terminate my membership.
In fact I invited them to do so if they are to continue to let you rat packers control the discourse here.
Would everyone under my control please raise their hands?
jerryc41 wrote:
Diplomatic immunity.
Diplomatic immunity if his credentials are accepted.
I'm not sure if this helps. I have a D5000 and also shoot raw. Raw is supposed to capture everything the camera "sees" and you should be able to adjust white balance problems in post-processing. I'm not sure if this is just a feature of individual camera models, but when I have adjusted white balance in the camera before shooting, what I see in post-processing is closer to good lighting than when I haven't adjusted WB in the camera, and it's a little easier to finish the post-processing. In theory, it shouldn't make any difference. If you're shooting JPEG, it's another story altogether, as the camera is designed to accept your adjustments in producing the JPEG.
Maybe someone else can give you a better answer.
larrypayne wrote:
And you don't support my right to free speech.
You have a right to free speech in a public forum. This is not a public forum. It's a privately run photographic forum, and Admin has kicked out people who were clearly interested in photography and who were quite talented. You are here just to stir up the pot, not because of any interest in photography. Admin is perfectly within his or her rights to boot you out of here. You would be well-advised to post your drivel in a
public forum, or in one with like-minded individuals.
creativ simon wrote:
If you sit long enough all sorts of things start to happen
Exploding bird? Quite dramatic, whatever!
creativ simon wrote:
Do you need a licence for a cat that size in New York :lol:
Well, the cat lives in New York, but the building's in Connecticut. I don't know, maybe there's some regulation about interstate transport of feline imagery.
creativ simon wrote:
Looking at it from the other side
Alternatively: Bottoms Up!
creativ simon wrote:
A glass act
Fun. :)
This is a re-post. Three shots blended together: the building, the reflection of the pond and, of course, Samson the Cat.
My apologies to the original poster and those interested in the original topic. This will be my last comment in this thread, as I know don't know enough about trading in the stock market to contribute anything useful. As noted by others, larrypayne has a one-track mind and insinuates his bigoted, biased hatred all over the place. It's necessary to keep an eye on him to disabuse those who are not familiar with him from thinking that he has anything useful to say.
Pepper wrote:
Funny the books you give credence to Larry. I have a book for you to read, its called the Bible. Funny that the only authors you agree with are those who support and confirm your insane theories. You are indeed a strange, evil little man.
larrypayne's Bible is entitled
Mein Kampf.
marcomarks wrote:
What does advanced have to do with anything? If they aren't advanced and can't have guns but their murder rate is higher than our "advanced" country where we do have guns, then the conclusion must be that the more advanced a country becomes and the more guns there are, the lower the crime rate is. A round about way of once again proving that more guns in the hands of "advanced" law-abiding citizens means less crime.
The less advanced countries are economically, and socially, far less stable. Also, more likely to have a colonial past and ethnic hodge podge because the Europeans drew lines and said, "That's a country."