I didn't see them either. (At least not yet.) I looked at the RAW files using Freestone Image Viewer since I had seen last night that it doesn't remove hot pixels. But there were none. Then I loaded the images in Lightroom and watched very closely as I clicked on one of the images to cause it to open, looking for that short moment in time that LR is displaying the original before applying its default set of conditions. Again, there were none.

But then I loaded the 1st RAW directly into Topaz Studio and magnified it. And there they were. See image 1. You have to look closely, but they are there. Some are red, some are green and some are blue. But they are there.

Image #2, I let Topaz AI Clear take care of the noise and do some sharpening. They are still there, but the noise is gone.

Next, I loaded the 1st RAW directly into DxO Photolab 2. For a moment I saw the dead pixels, and then they went away as DxO found them and took care of them. I was able to momentarily see then again as I changed the exposure level, but they immediately went away. After increasing prime noise removal, they were permanently gone. See image #3.

Decided to go back to Lightroom and to crank up the exposure. The only thing done to this image is increased exposure. I don't see the hot pixels. But I do see plenty of noise. See image #4.

Then, worked on correcting the noise in Lightroom. See image #5. (Sorry it is out of sequence -- I forgot to load it until the later images were already loaded)

Finally, I discovered that I had purchased Luminar 2018 and I loaded the image. See image #6 and #7

So what are we to make of this:

1. Luminar does not automatically attack hot pixels. I haven't dug through the manual adjustments to see if there is a way to do it manually.

2. There is a lot of noise. But I also see similar noise when using my 2 Olympus bodies -- EM5ii and EM1. I think that this is just something that has to be lived with when using m4/3. For comparison, I am loading an image from Oct 8, 2014 which is the last eclipse I was able to see due to clouds. This is the unedited image loaded in Faststone Image Viewer. See image #8 (There is a faint star a little above and a bit to the left. It is a star and not a hot pixel.)

Can you send me the RAW files? One way is to use wetransfer.com which allows you to send up to 2GB free at a time. Best way to do it is to send it to yourself and then when it emails you a link, to copy and paste that link into the reply. The link remains good for one week.

I do not know if Luminar removes hot pixels. I hope it does. I want to see if Lightroom or DxO deals with it. I also am curious about the band of affected pixels surrounding the main hot pixel. I also have other SW that I could try.

An exposure of 1/10 sec is not likely to generate enough heating to generate hot pixels. Look in the manual for your camera if it provides a way to remap hot pixels. The lens cap can remain on for this operation. It is going to take a long exposure (not sure their definition of long) and then find the hot pixels. It will then later ignore those pixels so that you don't see them again. It is not uncommon to see hot pixels. On my Olympus bodies, I see many with a 30 sec exposure. On my Sony bodies, I see none, even after 30 sec. But it is possible that Sony is finding the hot pixels before the file is saved and removing them. I don't have any knowledge of how they are really doing it.

These are hot pixels. On the left size is a common look to them when I zoom way in. The one to the right is fainter and does not have the border of extra pixels.

Did you shoot this in RAW or in JPEG. If in JPEG, I wonder if this is a demosaicing error as the RAW data is turned into a JPEG. If shot in RAW, what SW did you use to turn this into JPEG.

I have several cameras that can do a test for hot pixels and to map them such that you won't see them again. Hot pixels tend to start showing up as stuck after some amount of exposure time and the longer the time, the more you get. What I don't understand here is that with a Bayer Martrix, you should see red, blue or green hotpixels,

Some software programs can detect hot pixels and remove them before you actually see them. A couple of them are Lightroom and DxO Photolab. I just did an experiment. I took a 30 sec exposure of the night sky with an Olympus EM5ii camera that had hot pixels. I had red, blue and green hot pixels. By the way, it shows zero hot pixels with shorter exposures. The camera has had the hot pixels mapped. But its internal hot pixel test does not expose for 30 sec. I shot in RAW. If I then try to load in Lightroom, it momentarily displays the embedded JPEG and about a second later, the image changes. During the initial display, I see the hot pixels, and then the image changes and the hot pixels are gone as Lightroom removes them. An exception is when two hot pixels tough each other and those remain.

Then I tried another experiment. I opened the EM5ii RAW in Faststone Image Viewer and the hot pixels remained. Then saved it as a JPEG, and the hot pixels remained.

So back to the question: Did you shoot in RAW? And if your did, what SW did you make the JPEG with? Or did you shoot JPEG in the camera?

One more experiment I tried. I imported your downloaded JPEG into Lightroom. But the hot pixels remained. What I see here is that after the conversion to JPEG, the fixing of hot pixels is gone.

I will wait for your answer.