Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: AR Farm Gal
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
Aug 25, 2020 14:40:16   #
billroach2717 wrote:
I'm having a new computer built and am pretty secure with the big decisions made. I am looking for advice on the peripherals however. May I please hear your suggestions for: Monitor (single); Mouse; Keyboard; and Card Reader. Thanks in advance.


I am in the market for a computer that will handle Lightroom's big needs to work efficiently. Would you please share the specs of the computer that you bought?
Go to
Aug 14, 2020 09:13:42   #
larryepage wrote:
Last night was supposed to the peak of the annual Perseid Meteor Shower. Unfortunately, best viewing was forecast to be cut off early, because moonrise was not long after midnight. We went out anyway, hoping to get something, and knowing that skies in our area are anything but dark, even after driving miles from the city.

So...while the adventure was fun, the results were disappointing. The combination of light pollution and "heavy air' (high humidity) rendered my shots of the sky more like blue hour landscapes. Even reducing exposure (eventually by three and a half stops) tamed the noise, but rendered only the three or four brightest stars visible, which would not have bode well for meteors, most of which are of only very marginal brightness. The Milky Way was not visible, even though it was in a darker area of the sky.

So...we have marked in the "book" that any night sky work is going to require more travel, and we are considering an excursion next year to a true dark sky site. We will try for scheduling during one of the several meteor showers.

I hope that others who were discussing their plans had better results and will perhaps share them with us, either here or in the gallery.
Last night was supposed to the peak of the annual ... (show quote)


We had cloudy nights every night for the peak, so I'll just have to look at this shot from 2016.


(Download)
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 16:29:58   #
mkahn wrote:
Would need to know how much memory, graphics card and size of images you are editing, however you can check to see if Windows Defender is causing the problem easily by turning it off and running a trial. Don't forget to turn it back on when finished.


That's an easy thing to try. Thanks.
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 16:09:29   #
mkahn wrote:
I had the same problem. Also found that Lightroom was running slow. For Luminar, I changed the location of the files it creates so that they were no longer in the protected “pictures” folder. Also allowed Lightroom to pass through Windows Defender. Luminar 4 now works and Lightroom is much faster.


I was unable to add my computer system specs to my first post.


Go to
Aug 4, 2020 16:06:27   #
mkahn wrote:
I had the same problem. Also found that Lightroom was running slow. For Luminar, I changed the location of the files it creates so that they were no longer in the protected “pictures” folder. Also allowed Lightroom to pass through Windows Defender. Luminar 4 now works and Lightroom is much faster.


Question: Lightroom is running slow as molasses, especially when doing any detailed adjustments. I'm attaching a snip of my computer system specs and Windows Defenders settings. I have tried making all the adjustments suggested by Adobe but no improvement. Is my computer simply lacking the memory & CPU needed for LR, or could this Windows Defender be an issue?


Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:13:51   #
ski wrote:
what were your settings?


I shot this photo with a Canon 7D Mk II and a Canon 100-400 Mk II lens at 104 mm. I expected to need a longer focal length, and that could be helpful, depending on the image you have in mind. Aperture 4.5 (widest), Shutter speed 20 seconds, ISO 2000. This was about 4:30 a.m., and the quarter moon was up adding to the brightness. A higher ISO and longer shutter speed would be necessary in a darker environment. It is difficult to see with the naked eye, so finding it and focusing is difficult. Binoculars might be helpful. There is information at Space.com about viewing times. Hope this helps.
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:11:54   #
[quote=John from gpwmi]Nicely done, Ellen. If you take some more photos of it, please post them. I understand after it leaves it won't show up again for 6800 years.[/quote

Thank you! I hope our humidity and haziness will clear out again so I can try another time.
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:10:30   #
JanSIrons wrote:
Great shot! I got up at 4 AM also, but here all we saw was Venus ... scanned the NW sky horizon for 20 minutes but didn't spot anything that looked like this. Supposedly tonight at 10 PM it'll be back on the horizon in the NW sky. Will try again! Congratulations on this shot!


Thank you! I was really excited. Want to see if I can "one up" myself.
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:09:48   #
ORpilot wrote:
if you loved your 4 AM shot just wait until you get your Sunset shot. This was from last night. Comet over Mt Hood.


Lovely!! I tried later in the evening. I may try earlier if our skies will clear out. It's too cloudy/hazy right now.
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:07:02   #
JanSIrons wrote:
Great shot! I got up at 4 AM also, but here all we saw was Venus ... scanned the NW sky horizon for 20 minutes but didn't spot anything that looked like this. Supposedly tonight at 10 PM it'll be back on the horizon in the NW sky. Will try again! Congratulations on this shot!


We tried on Monday evening, and I was able to capture it even thought I couldn't see (talk about a shot in the dark!). It was a terrible image, though.
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:05:35   #
Dannj wrote:
You’ll try again? I thought this was like a 7,000 year occurrence😳


I'm planning on being around awhile! :)
Go to
Jul 15, 2020 16:03:01   #
no12mo wrote:
Yes, please!... Camera, lens - ISO, aperture, shutter speed etc. Oh yeah, focal length of lens. Please


I shot this photo with a Canon 7D Mk II and a Canon 100-400 Mk II lens at 104 mm. I expected to need a longer focal length, and that could be helpful, depending on the image you have in mind. Aperture 4.5 (widest), Shutter speed 20 seconds, ISO 2000. This was about 4:30 a.m., and the quarter moon was up adding to the brightness. A higher ISO and longer shutter speed would be necessary in a darker environment. It is difficult to see with the naked eye, so finding it and focusing is difficult. Binoculars might be helpful. There is information at Space.com about viewing times. Hope this helps.
Go to
Jul 14, 2020 21:15:09   #
cameranut wrote:
Wow! Lucky you. I am going to try to locate it but I'm on the east side, so I'm not too optimistic. Still, it's something to try for.


You can go to Space.com. There is information there about good viewing times, etc.
Go to
Jul 14, 2020 17:23:55   #
Frank 2012 wrote:
That's a good picture ! What camera, lens, etc, did you use?


I was using a Canon 7D Mk II with a Canon 100-400 F4L Mk II lens. I was at 2000 ISO, 20 seconds, f4.5. I took this shot at about 4:30 a.m.

We looked last night. I got a couple of shots, but they were terrible. I couldn't even to see it to focus on it. We couldn't find it even with binoculars. Finally, I just shot NW and happened to capture it.
Go to
Jul 14, 2020 16:14:09   #
So, I got up at 4 a.m. July 13th. to try to see Neowise Comet. Was it worth it? YES! It was very difficult for me to photograph, but I will have a better idea of how to do it now and will try again. My composition was a little off, but I was excited to get this.


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.