How many shutter activations?
Condition?
When did you buy these items?
Any warranty?
Why are you selling?
It would be helpful if you could post photos of everything.

This question has been previously discussed ad nauseum. Please search the archives and you will see many recommendations from scanners you can buy or scanners you can easily put together yourself -- slide copiers are a good way to go and is what I use.

My only criticism is that your colorization lost all the hair highlights that are very important and flattering for any portrait of a woman.

Started with 2 Asahi Spotmatics I bought at Canadian PX in Baden Baden, Germany in 1966 along with 28mm, 55mm, 105mm, 200mm and 300mm Super Takumar lenses, while stationed in Stuttgart. Upgraded to Sf1n in 1989 with a Tamron 28-200mm zoom, and then Zx5n in early 1990's. Then went digital with *istD and a Tamron 18-200mm zoom lens; upgraded to K10 and then K20, then K-7 and finally for the past several years, a K-5 with a Pentax 18-250mm zoom, which I replaced with a Sigma 18-300mm zoom last year when the 18-250 focusing mechanism broke.

Take a look at ACDSee -- they have several different editing programs all at very competitive prices. I have used Photo Studio Pro (and its predecessors) for 15 years and obviously like it.

I thought "Neat" was the proper way to drink a good single malt.

I, too, have all my insurance with USAA (ever since I got my gold 2nd Lt. bars over 60 years ago). I have all my camera equipment covered with their PAF (personal affects floater) and have several claims over the years, including the last one where I accidentally dropped my 4-year old 18-250 Pentax zoom lens and the AF no longer worked. So I called them and they sent me a check for that was actually more than the cost of a brand new Sigma 16-300 zoom lens. No claim form or photo required, just a phone call. My prior claims included the cost of replacing 3 cameras (one accidentally dropped in a lake getting out of a fishing boat, another other that fell out of my back while riding my bike, and one dropped when I tripped going down some stairs and the lens mount broke), a couple of polaroid filters that came unscrewed and fell off the lens, and even the loss of a lens hood. All handled with just one phone call and cashing their check for the full cost of replacement with new items. Does that answer your question? The only problem I've had with USAA is, as another hogger noted, is with auto claims, but with some persistence and extra time, even those claims got resolved very well and generously even though it took some legal arguments and threats to cancel on my part.

That is what I have done every time I have migrated to a new version from an older version of ACDSee.

You should take a look at ACDSee -- they have several different levels of software starting at $30 for software with very robust features.

ACDSee Studio Ultimate and Pro both have very good sharpening and noise suppression tools, so why would you need to put an image into PS, Topaz, etc. after you tweak it in ACDSee?

That should be o.k. because v17 and v19 are separate programs -- whatever edits you have done to your photos previously should remain the same when viewed in Studio Pro.

I think so, but just to be safe, I would call ACDSee to discuss before you delete them -- there may be some nuances to migrating from 17 and 19 to Studio Pro. I have always used the Pro versions and not the more basic programs like 17 and 19 (they keep changing the name so what I have that I upgraded to last year is now called Studio Pro 2020). FYI, when I upgraded to the 2019 version I kept the 2018 version for several months just in case something was lost in transition, but both still worked fine and finally I uninstalled the 2018 version and have had no problems since other than having to reset all my configuration preferences, which I have always had to do even with the so-called upgrades from older versions of the same program. You would think that by now ACDSee would have eliminated having to do that like other software programs have done whenever they upgrade their software.

Just so you know, v. 19 does not use layers, so if you don't want layers but want perspective correction, go with Photo Studio Pro (I use last year's version and haven't decided whether to upgrade to 2020) and save some money instead of going to Ultimate (I don't want layers so I have never spent the extra money for it).

I suggest the Photo Studio Pro unless you want layers. That's the one I have used for years through the various annual iterations. Again, the main difference between Ultimate and Studio Pro is Ultimate uses layers, Studio Pro does not, so Studio Pro is less expensive than Ultimate.

Both Ultimate and Studio Pro are a lot different than the lesser ACDSee programs, so what you see in Ultimate is not what is available in 19 (I think it's now called Editor 11, which does not include perspective correction according to the spec sheets).