Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: tommyest
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Oct 24, 2011 21:02:39   #
Here are some shots I posted in another IR thread. They were done as part of Digital IR class. All shot with my D300 and Tiffen IR filter.






Go to
Oct 24, 2011 15:15:39   #
Years ago on a trip to Mexico, I took out travel insurance that covered my camera gear. Good thing I did, someone broke into my hotel room and stole my gear. I filed a police report and got a copy of the report. When I got back to the states, I filed a claim with a copy of the police report and the claim was quickly paid.
Go to
Oct 20, 2011 16:00:04   #
Stanley wrote:
I like the durability factor of the D300 as well. I plan on using my D300 for 100% of my work and durability is crucial-"plus the image ain't bad either?" I wish the low-light performance was better too, but if you want all of those things you have to pay for them. There is the option of the D700 for low-light capability. Maybe when the D800 comes out, the prices for D700s will come into a more reasonable price range for me? There will be a feeding frenzy for the new one and D700 owners will be dumping them fast to be the first on the block to have one.
-Stanley Mitchell
I like the durability factor of the D300 as well.... (show quote)


We can only hope and pray
:D :D :D :D :-D :-D
Go to
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Oct 19, 2011 19:31:21   #
Welcome, it can be really difficult trying to talk to people about photography when they have no clue about the technical end. The new cameras are just too easy to use and get acceptable pictures.
Go to
Oct 19, 2011 16:11:32   #
I have been using the D300 for two years now and I love it. I easily get prints up to and over 20 X 30 in. The D300S has better high ISO performance, I don't care about the video. It is a heavier duty camera than most of the "consumer" bodies.
Go to
Oct 19, 2011 16:03:21   #
You also may have the problem of focusing on the BG. Check that your focus spot is on the action you are trying to capture.
Go to
Oct 19, 2011 15:58:12   #
As a general rule, the camera manufacturer's lenses will be of higher build quality than the off brand lenses. I have heard horror stories of people with off brand lenses trying to get them repaired. I have had good luck buying off of eBay. Just read the description carefully, check out their return policy, and check their feedback rating.
Go to
Oct 18, 2011 11:56:47   #
gordy wrote:
Tommyest, tks for getting back to me.

As I said, I am brand new to photography. Your response sparked a new question in my mind. If I have an 18 -105 lens, that means that with no zooming I can see a certain distance and things look relatively far away, depending on what I'm focusing on. Does this mean that if I had a lens that began at 60mm, the same objects on which I focused would be way closer up from the start? And are you also saying that there is such a thing as a 60 mm macro lens and a 105 mm macro lens? Are these simply special lenses that allow you to get incredibly close to people or things right away? Are there also regular lens that have the same mm numbers and, while they are not macro lenses, still allow you to see people and objects way up closer from the start. Are these the lenses that photographers use to get those pictures of people where you can see every line, bump, pimple in their faces? Hope to hear from you soon.
Tommyest, tks for getting back to me. br br As I ... (show quote)


I also have the 18-105mm and I have found it to be a excellent general purpose lens, as long as you are shooting within it's limits. At 18mm it is a wide angle, and at 105mm it is a medium telephoto. The main trouble I find with it is the variable aperture, decreasing to f/5.6 at 105mm. If you get a fixed focal length lens, you get exactly the same field of view as with a zoom lens set at that focal length. The fixed length lens will be sharper because it does not have the compromises that are necessary to make a zoom lens. Also, these zooms are intended to be "kit" lenses, included with a camera to make it easier for the beginning photographer to get started.
The higher quality zoom lenses will start about $1,500, will generally offer a shorter zoom range, have a higher aperture, have better build quality, and will be sharper throughout the zoom range.
The "macro" lenses are especially made to focus close AND to render a flat field sharp from edge to edge. That is to say, if you set up your camera exactly parallel to a newspaper which is taped flat on a wall, your picture will be sharp from edge to edge. A normal lens is not set up to do this. The macro lenses are also usable for general purpose photography and are very sharp.
The design of these lenses is of the highest quality as well as the manufacturing standards, thus the higher price. The good thing is that once you buy one of these lenses, you can keep it for life.
As a general rule, a good fixed focal length lens will be sharper than a good zoom lens. There are some excellent zoom lenses, and it might be difficult to see the difference in general photography, but the prime will always win in tests.
It all depends on the type of photography you want to do and how much money you want to spend. REMEMBER, high prices gear doesn't make a good photographer. You have to develop a eye for pictures, and then the necessary skills to render the picture that you have in your mind. You can generally get by with "lesser" gear while developing these skills and then move up to "pro" gear if your needs demand it and your skills warrant it.
Let me know if you have more questions, I will try to answer.
Go to
Oct 17, 2011 16:10:40   #
Believe me, she was MORE than happy with the shots I gave her.
Go to
Oct 15, 2011 18:10:14   #
oleg wrote:
I took a nice, innocent girl and turned her into an experienced Hollywood babe :-(


Yes, but she doesn't want to look like a "experienced Hollywood babe".
Go to
Oct 15, 2011 01:07:15   #
oleg wrote:
IMHO
Studio shot w. the feather is great. The rest lack that certain je ne sais quoi. I'm still trying to "DE-quoi" it :) There's something that sets apart a pro photo from the amateur snap shot. It could be sharpness or resolution. I'm just not sure. Your feather shot has it. Others do not. I've tried touching up 1 of your images to see if I can get IT, but I don't think I did. (I hope you don't mind).
Oleg


Red lips make her look tacky.
Go to
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Oct 14, 2011 20:51:44   #
RockinRobinG wrote:
Adding... the lens is a "Nikon AF Nikkor 70-300, 1:4-5:6" MANUAL focus. Would like a zoom that will AUTO focus.


The AF in the lens name means that it is Auto Focus.
Go to
Oct 14, 2011 20:43:37   #
Back in the olden days we were limited by film speed and needed the faster lenses to shoot in low light conditions. Now, especially with some on the newer cameras, you can boost the ISO to very high numbers and get very usable shots. Also, back at the dawn of time, we focused manually, and the faster lenses made for brighter images on the screen as well as shallower depth of field to make it easier to see when the image was in or out of focus.
Also, most of these lenses are being sold to beginners who are buying a camera with a"kit" lens. Their main goal is to take pictures of family and friends, not do street photography at night.
The fast lenses are still available, they just cost a lot of money, and are bought by photographers who need them and know how to use them.
Go to
Oct 14, 2011 20:25:28   #
You may be talking about the image stabilation lenses which should enable you to shoot hand held at slower shutter speeds. The other numbers you are referring to is the diameter of the front of the lens so you know what size filters to buy for it.
Go to
Oct 14, 2011 20:20:59   #
It could be that the tripod doesn't have a head. You may need to buy one.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.