Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GrandmaG
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 202 next>>
Sep 11, 2021 08:53:09   #
The Saint KK4GO wrote:
I have the canon g6020tank printer. With glossy paper it does an awesome print job.


Thank you for that. I’ve always loved my Canon printers. I didn’t know they had a 6-tank printer, so I plan on getting that one when it is back in stock. It’s the G620.
Go to
Sep 10, 2021 11:52:22   #
bsprague wrote:
The Epson advertising says that the ET-8500 is $600, uses 6 colors, includes a scanner and prints 8 1/2" by 11". The bigger, $700 ET-8550 prints 13" wide with the same features.

So for 8 1/2 x 11 prints it is the Canon G620 vs the Epson ET-8500. For 13 x 19 prints, it is only the ET-8550. I don't see a Canon tank photo printer that will do 13 x 19.

Availability is tight.

What do you want to know?


The epson has a better scanner, more input trays and an LCD screen. The Canon is currently unavailable at B&H. I’m mostly interested in picture quality between the two. Is the Epson worth $300 more?
Go to
Sep 10, 2021 00:30:09   #
bsprague wrote:
Canon does not call the 3 color 5020 a photo printer. Canon calls the G620 a photo printer. It has 6 colors of ink in tanks.


That's what I thought. Thank you. What about the Epson ET-8500?
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 21:58:07   #
GrandmaG wrote:
This link provided by Linda from Maine worked for me. Try it.

https://fujifilm-x.com/global/support/download/software/


I'm going to modify this statement. My older Raf photos still cannot be viewed in Finder; but photos I just uploaded can be viewed. They are uncompressed raw (Raf) files and as stated by 30West, the MACOS does read them. I can only conclude that my older files were compressed. I will investigate further if the software I downloaded is any help. BTW, the link he provided doesn't work.

Update: So here's what happened. I downloaded the software and opened it, giving it permission to view my photos. I opened the folder with the older Raf files and I could see them in the software. Then I went to Finder and I still could not see them there, but I could see the files that I imported as DNGs. Further investigation is needed.
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 21:54:01   #
a6k wrote:
Please try this: highlight one or multiple files, in Finder. Press the space bar or right-click and use QuickView. Does that let you see the quickly and easily? If so, you can either portray them in a grid or even full-screen and play a slide show. You control which images are included. PM me if I'm not being clear on how to do this.


That's a neat trick to quickly see a photo!! Thanks
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 19:54:50   #
There is also the Epson ET-8500 that I am considering. It has 6 EcoTanks
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 18:47:16   #
rossk wrote:
The issue bugging me is the inability to see the thumbnail preview for each raw file when I open a folder of recently taken raw images.(see attached image) I presume Apple has not yet made the necessary changes to OS in BigSur.


This link provided by Linda from Maine worked for me. Try it.

https://fujifilm-x.com/global/support/download/software/
Go to
Sep 9, 2021 17:59:37   #
I've always used Canon printers and need a new all-in-one that will still do decent pictures. Considering a mega tank but some of the reviews aren't great and since it only has 3 color tanks, it probably won't do a good job for pictures. I was considering the G5020. Advice please, from anyone using this printer. The search function didn't yield any recent posts about the mega tank printers.
Go to
Aug 7, 2021 23:18:45   #
joecichjr wrote:
My condolences Lovely shots of a hearty, exemplary husband and companion
🌀☀️💞☀️🌀


Thank you! He was very good to me.
Go to
Aug 7, 2021 14:00:49   #
User ID wrote:
Much fine advice throughout the thread. Follow it as much as is possible but don’t be intimated by perfectionism. The first photo below is a quick copy job by phone, lit by the room’s overhead lighting fixture. It was made to illustrate a question in a phone conversation, just a family matter, not for any aesthetic purposes, and yet it looks great. All PP was done in the phone. Original is a small print, about 5x7”.

The second image below is also a copy by phone, of a large print on a hallway wall in a public place, done with dim ambient lighting. Copying can be far less scientific than some geeks will insist, but acoarst be as “scientific” as is practical (for you).
.
Much fine advice throughout the thread. Follow it ... (show quote)


Thank you. Great job. I especially like the 2nd picture. The phones are quite amazing nowadays.
Go to
Aug 7, 2021 01:14:15   #
smussler wrote:
Before doing all that, first check if table top is level. Have an older house? With settling, even the floors may not be level.
I just moved into a new house with ceramic tile floors, needed some shims to get my dinning room table to sit level, or at least stop rocking - 3 legged pedestals on each half of the table.
Good luck with your project, getting ideas here for how to share about 30 years of my dads family 35mm slides.


That’s true. Most houses, old or new are not level nor square. With settling, we’ve had to readjust doors. Hanging pictures and window treatments was always a challenge to get straight as well.

It seems a lot of hoggers have done projects like this. I knew I would get a lot of help here. Thanks for your input.
Go to
Aug 7, 2021 01:08:48   #
Najataagihe wrote:
First, please accept my condolences.


Next, if suspending the camera under a tripod, put it on a table and buy a 7-inch torpedo level.

Place it across the lens and level it.

Rotate it 90 degrees around the lens and level.

Repeat until it is dead level.

You are now square with the tabletop.

Place picture on table between tripod legs.

Stop lens down for greater depth of field and use flash placed to the side at 45 degrees to the tabletop.

Experiment with aperture and flash settings until you get what you want.

Once locked down, snap away!
First, please accept my condolences. br br br Ne... (show quote)


Ok, I think there’s a level like that around here (I had to google it). I’m hoping this tripod method will work because a copy stand with lights is $340 plus. The whole idea to photograph is to save the gist of scanning. Plus, I’m thinking that the results will be better. Thanks for these instructions.
Go to
Aug 6, 2021 23:16:41   #
fetzler wrote:
You can actually use a variety of lights. I have used photofloods (these are old fashioned and super hot), electronic flashes and regular light bulbs (High CRI Led lights are fine), and LED light panels. If you are using copy stand it may have light fixtures built in. You will need two lights placed at a 45 degree angle from plane of the image. This will create even lighting and reflections will not come into the camera. I have light stands for works on a wall or easel. Using your camera light meter and a sheet of paper verify lighting is even. Flashes work just fine but are a little harder to get right. (remember you will need two with diffuses - Kleenex may be OK) You will of course need a tripod unless you use a copy stand.

After studying your lenses I think the 85 mm has the best shot to work. Longer focal lengths are less likely to give you distortion issues. If the lens is is too long the working distance becomes so long that the set up won't fit in the room. Zoom lenses are not a great choice as these likely have the greatest distortion. Don't forget you can rent a macro lens with an 80-100mm focal length . (assuming FX or DX format camera)

Adobe Acrobat is for document creation and is available by subscription. The Acrobat distiller component allows one to make a press ready pdf file. Using Microsoft Publisher may also be a good route also for setting up the pages you could also add a title page , forward, etc to the document. The output can a pdf file. Some printers can use your publisher file directly. Foxit Editor appears to be a full featured competitor to Acrobat ( https://www.foxit.com/shopping/) at a cheaper price. The Idea is to get an electronic copy that has formatted pages for book printing or electronic viewing.
You can actually use a variety of lights. I have ... (show quote)


The sample shots I did with the 85 mm and they were placed on the floor. I had to get quite far away to get the whole image in the frame. It might be easier to put the page on an easel against the wall. I have light stands and I do have a couple of LED lights that I could use. Thanks for the tips on how to set up the lights.

I will look into the software choices you mentioned.

I’m now wondering if I need to make the images wider to allow for a binding edge.
Go to
Aug 6, 2021 18:17:36   #
User ID wrote:
Soft boxes are rather troublesome for copying. Directional lighting, arranged symmetrically, is key. If soft is all that you have, make some snoots for them.


I can do that. Thanks!
Go to
Aug 6, 2021 18:11:39   #
charlienow wrote:
You are welcome.

If all of the originals have already been scanned you can use those. Scan/photograph all the documents. You can make a beautiful book on Shutterfly with the images. My last one was an 11x14 with I think 112 pages. I used all black background for it. I could probably pm you a link if you want to view it.

Shutterfly has many options for a book and many different templates to use. You can even let them build your book for you. This is free and with no obligation to use their design.

Chuck
You are welcome. br br If all of the originals h... (show quote)


I would love to view your book. I have done digital scrapbooks with the digital images for the younger boys. I used Creative Memories software that is no longer available. Also, I have done books with Shutterfly. Thank you for sharing.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 202 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.