Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: aflundi
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
Oct 9, 2019 10:14:10   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Actually I did try one in both a Z7 and D850, card is not recognized by either.
Once the firmware update is loaded the XQD will be the "backwards compatible" card format.


Darn. I was hoping the card hardware might have some XQD backward compatibility. The firmware backwards compatibility has been talked about a lot, but I've never seen it mentioned about the physical card side. Now we know. Thanks for trying it and sharing!
Go to
Oct 9, 2019 09:41:05   #
MT Shooter wrote:
CFExpress is totally different from CF. It shares the same format as XQD cards but at 4-5 times the write speeds. XQD is used in D4, D4s, D5, D500, D850, Z6, Z7, and almost all upcoming pro and semi pro format cameras from Nikon. Will require a firmware update to work in those cameras which Nikon has promised will be coming in November.


Have you tried a CFExpress card anyway in one of your unpatched XQD cameras? I'm wondering if CFExpress might work as XQD as a backwards compatibility capability at the card level?
Go to
Jun 2, 2019 09:31:25   #
OutdoorOldie wrote:
Anyone heard of/have this free,non-destructive,RAW file editor?...
annie


My most used image editor by far.
Go to
May 15, 2019 19:40:36   #
HOT Texas wrote:
... I would like to see it named Artistic Photography, ...

How about Optical Artistry to include Lensbabies, Tilt-Shift lenses, Free-lensing, Prisms, Crystal balls, Special-effects lens filters, etc.?
Go to
Apr 24, 2019 11:32:06   #
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Because a tilt shift lens has a changeable focal length as projected on to the sensor, I do not see how a photographer can use it for precise photogrammetry. I used to take photos of objects for use by people who would analyze the photo forensuration, the measuring of an object by calculating focal length, distance to object, etc. You have probably seen crime photos where an object of known length is included in a photo, usually a ruler or yard stick. By analyzing the length of the yardstick, you can, within parameters evaluate the densions of an object of hitherto unknown size. I used a 50mm f1.4 lens for photos of vehicles, and we could tell the size of the vehicle within small tolerances. Don't see how you can do that with a tilt shift lens as you are adjusting it so that the side of the building look straight.
In other words, you are making it look good, not taking a photo than can be used for measurent or mapmaking or intelligence analysis. Zoom lenses have the same problem, in that the precise focal length is unknown, except when you are at either end, though they can be used for a close approximation when the photo is taken at either end of the zoom range. There is always some distortion in ANY lens, the difference is in degree. Space telecopes have less, cheap binoculars have more.... same with camera lenses. Thisay be one reason why pros carry a bunch of fixed lenses rather than one long zoom....less distortion, in addition other advantages.
The OP needs an accurate method of reording densions for an excavation project; itmcould be for a nuclear power plant containment vessel, who know? In such a case, I am confident a tilt shift lens would not be used when precise meaaurents are needed.
Because a tilt shift lens has a changeable focal l... (show quote)

Maybe we are thinking of different scenarios.

There are certainly many types of photogrammetry and many different types of scenes to be measured, which ultimately may require different methods for optimal use, but if you've cleared an area and made it reasonably flat, having a flat, undistorted image would allow easy measurements.

For instance, if you placed a rectangular frame with a meter stick on each end and then shifted a TS-lens so that the meter sticks on each end of the frame filled the appropriate side of the camera frame, you'd have an undistorted image that would make measurements not only simpler, but trial. In addition, by applying the correct tilt to the lens, you'd have better focus of the area. No distortion, no out-of-focus parts of the image.
Go to
Apr 24, 2019 09:38:46   #
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
... This is why you need a non adjustable focal length non shift tilt lens in taking any photo where mensuration is required. Remember, distortion is the enemy.


Why? Tilt-shift lenses are designed and used to remove otherwise inevitable distortion, not add it.

What kind of distortion are you suggesting tilt-shift lenses add?
Go to
Apr 23, 2019 22:25:14   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I would think that would be the last thing you would use as it would introduce distortion which would work against photogrammetry purposes.

Why would a tilt-shift lens introduce distortion? They are built to have extremely flat, distortion-free optics, the shift is to prevent keystoning, and the tilt is to keep the plane-of-interest in focus. I don't get where you are coming from. I'm talking about a real tilt-shift lens BTW, not a lensbaby.

The only disadvantage I can see with a tilt-shift lens is that it's a slow process setting the shot up.
Go to
Apr 23, 2019 21:08:41   #
sewenner wrote:
... Thoughts?

Isn't that something you'd want to use a Tilt-Shift lens for?
Go to
Apr 10, 2019 10:30:10   #
farwest wrote:
... I'm a bit confused why the pins bent. ... Well I have the SD slot which doesn't have pins to use. ...


I'm confused too. XQD uses card edge connections just like SD cards do, don't they? So what "pins" are we talking about here? Did you actually see something bent in the slot?
Go to
Mar 25, 2019 20:14:09   #
splatbass wrote:
I'm not at home, so I don't have that info.


Ok, that makes sense. Are you planning on getting home soon?
Go to
Mar 25, 2019 17:48:26   #
splatbass wrote:
I'm aware it has been discussed. That is why I posted this, because I had photographs pertaining to the argument.

Are you not telling us which B+W filter model for a reason? Without that information, it's hard to come to any useful conclusion.
Go to
Mar 24, 2019 18:21:05   #
amfoto1 wrote:
...B+W filters are good, but even they offer different quality filters at different price points. In the size you use, they offer:
- 67mm UV 010 "SC" which has a single coating for $19.99.
- 67m UV 010 "MRC" (might be labelled "F-Pro) which has 8-layer multi-coatings, for $29.95.
- 67mm UV 010 "XS-Pro which uses a slimmer frame, has 16-layer "Nano" multi-coatings, and costs $33.95.
- 67mm UV/IR Cut 486 "MRC", a specialty filter intended for reducing excessive IR light, along with UV, which can cause color shifts or tints and might occur during longer exposures (such as when using neutral density filters). 8-layer multi-coatings, $72.00.
- 67mm Strong UV Absorbing, a specialty filter for use when photographing fluorescing subjects that can cause CA and reduced sharpness in images. Uncoated. $110.
..
...B+W filters are good, but even they offer diffe... (show quote)

I agree here. B+W is a good brand, but the specific model is of huge importance as some are very flare resistant, and others not so much.

Splatbass, it would be very useful to know which specific model filter you used.
Go to
Mar 24, 2019 09:45:12   #
Bill_de wrote:
... What brand filter did you have on the lens. ...

Good question. Not all filters are equal.
Go to
Mar 20, 2019 08:53:48   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
.... I shoot 99% in studio w/ studio strobes. (But might ease into non-strobe because of high ISO capability with the new camera). Headshots, full length swimsuits, nudes. Almost never shoot still lifes but am good at them. Do not shoot sports or fast movement.

Looking forward to hearing from you all.


I have both. Either way you'll have a *very* good camera.

Based on what you say you want to use it for, I'd go with the Z6. But, you may need to overhaul your lens collection if you go that route. If you choose the D500, which would also do very well for your intended uses, all your current lenses and accessaries (except battery grip) will just work.

So, if you don't mind spending a bit extra for FX things like lenses, go with the Z6. If you want to limit your expenses to just a body, go with the D500. Either way you'll have a sweet setup and you'll be a happy camper.
Go to
Mar 19, 2019 20:46:35   #
Jim Eads wrote:
It is tight. It is adjustable with an included allen wrench. Tolerances are excellent. As heavy as the D850 is with the battery grip and the 28-300 lens mounted, there was virtually no play or flex. I had it mounted on an Induro carbon fiber tripod.


I'm going to have to try to get one then. Thanks for passing along your experience, details and the tip about emailing from the website.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.