Posts for: duck72
Apr 1, 2019 16:17:17 #
Bill P wrote:
Wow! remember, when you hear hoofbeats think horses, not zebras. I have had this happen sometimes, and it's when I have gotten a new camera nad haven't downloaded the ACR update, so the raw files are greyed out. That's the first thing I would check. If it's not all one file type, I would only then go with zebras.
Apr 1, 2019 15:57:12 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Not if you use a cable to connect the camera to the computer. There's no wear and tear on the door or the card.
Yes, that's true. I'm well aware that images can be downloaded from the camera without *ever* removing card(s) from the camera- just causes wear&tear on the *slow* micro-USB (or whatever) camera port, (camera battery required), and defeats utility of removable cards, faster card readers, etc. I suspect if we took a survey of UHHers, most would say that they pop their cards in and out frequently (and carefully), with no ill effects. As you well know from being a daily contributor, whenever anybody is having problems downloading from their camera, the absolute first question/suggestion is invariably, "Why don't you buy a card reader???" Not using one is like riding a hobbled horse.
Apr 1, 2019 07:14:41 #
johneccles wrote:
I never take the SD cards out of the camera, this can cause the problem you have, it really is not necessary to ever take SD cards out.
Surely, this is an "April Fools" comment (?)
Mar 29, 2019 07:25:56 #
Mar 29, 2019 07:01:41 #
I lived in Colorado for five years and traveled extensively, backpacking, camping, and such in the higher elevations as well as up and down the Front Range and Western Slope. For your stated purpose, I also recommend October- but not too late in the month. The Aspen and such turn color much earlier at the higher elevations, and the risk of snow at higher elevations obviously starts earlier as well. Temperatures will drop at night, but your daytime temperatures in the "lower" elevations where you say you will be spending most of your time, can and likely will be very comfortable and "Springlike" well into October – then again you could get a "freak" snowstorm- no guarantees. Have fun! It's endlessly beautiful, and there are photo opportunities galore- around every turn.
Mar 29, 2019 06:10:01 #
For "walkaround" use, I often affix a Sigma 17-70 1:2.8-4 DC on Nikon D7200 (APS-C) - I find the minimum focal distance on longer zoom telephotos restricting sometimes, as is many of their smaller maximum apertures- also their additional weight and size. Of course I use them for "mission-specific" shooting- that's the purpose of an interchangeable lens platform. As others have said, choice depends on your "style," and what you are trying to capture most often during your "walkarounds." I would zero-in on the fastest, highest-quality lens you can afford in the focal-length range you use most often.
Mar 26, 2019 01:07:52 #
Mar 26, 2019 00:40:49 #
Architect1776 wrote:
ALX hit it.
Many like the conversion. But I just don't like it as it does not period fit my F and if I use it on a digital camera it does not matter as I use it just fine on my 7D and 10D in p, M, or AV modes.
Again a super lens regardless and have fun using this wonderful classic.
Many like the conversion. But I just don't like it as it does not period fit my F and if I use it on a digital camera it does not matter as I use it just fine on my 7D and 10D in p, M, or AV modes.
Again a super lens regardless and have fun using this wonderful classic.
My "period fit" "F" - with removable/changeable viewfinders that I sorely miss quit viewfinder-working. Ridiculous prices to "repair." I also miss my Beseler 23CII- (still have- Nikkor lens and all.) Mixing and dodging, the smell of fixer. Conversion for some is good- conversion for others YOUR CHOICE. "Classic" - Yes, for a beginner, entry level, semi-pro, non-professional lens. I threw away 99% of the shots I took with it before taking to post processing when 35mm
Mar 24, 2019 18:37:46 #
I still have mine! It is an even older version that I liked so much I paid the $40 to have it converted for modern use. I don't know how much of a bargain, but as you said, built like a *tank* and takes excellent images if you do your part. The "snap out" sunshade is a nice feature too!
Mar 23, 2019 14:31:37 #
You might find this a useful resource. Gary has always responded *personally* to questions I have asked. He *knows* "Apple stuff."
https://macmost.com/
https://macmost.com/
Mar 20, 2019 11:59:18 #
I think you got more replies then I am going to read. My two-cents worth is the D7200 would be the best choice. Yes, they both have the same sensor – that's where the comparison ends. As far as the articulating screen- I see that as an appendage to break off. Since you have a D850, you would be "foolish" to buy a D5600. The D7200 is a far better camera. Even girls can learn to use its more user-friendly interfaces.
Mar 5, 2019 21:05:12 #
Mar 3, 2019 15:14:10 #
Mar 2, 2019 22:33:08 #
Bobspez wrote:
On Kodak's web site https://kodakdigitizing.com/ they will digitize 20 reels of film for $297 with their 10% off code. Their facebook page refers people to their website. There's nothing about 10" reels for $65. I don't even think they make 10" reels for 8mm film.
Mar 2, 2019 20:28:25 #
Kodak has been pushing a digitizing service on Facebook. I have not used it, but my understanding is they will digitize as much as will fit on up to a 10-inch reel for $65. I did have their customer service verify this. Also, if a splice might break while digitizing, they will fix it- no extra charge, but not if it's just break after break after break. Sorry, I don't have a link, but you should be able to find easily.