Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Rbrylawski
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20 next>>
Jan 23, 2014 23:18:58   #
Samuraiz wrote:
If you took your avatar photo then you do have creativity. :thumbup:


Thank you. Yes, I took the Avatar picture. Even someone creatively challenged can occasionally take a decent picture! ;)
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 23:08:30   #
Samuraiz wrote:
Give it a try. Set you camera to an appropriate shutter speed, let the camera select the aperture, and learn to see the many possibilities. attack each photo from every angle and only press the shutter when you see something that pleases you.


I do this all the time. It's not that I have any technical issues. It's that I don't see a picture with the same creativity as others do. Trust me, I'm not looking for sympathy. I enjoy photography. I just wish I could find that perspective that a truly creative person sees.
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 23:01:53   #
Elliern wrote:
Most of us are born left or right brain dominate. Some more so than others. I have a family member who is EXTREMELY creative and very talented. Me...not so much. But, she insists anyone can learn to be creative and I have come to agree with her. I have learned techniques and "rules" that have helped me become more creative, as did learning more about composition. Seeing what others do teaches me to look at things differently. I will never become as creative and artistically talented as she is. But I have learned and grown a lot over the past year or two...and I have definitely become more creative. I do have to work at it, however. It does not come naturally. I still don't see or think as creatively as one who naturally has that gift. But I am definitely better than I was.
Most of us are born left or right brain dominate. ... (show quote)


You and I have to be related. It honestly peeves me that my partner, who has no understanding of photography, no comprehension of White Balance, ISO, Aperture, Shutter Speed, none of it, can take an aesthetically more interesting picture than I can. I can only imagine what he'd be capable of if he actually had some knowledge. To him, his camera just has buttons and knobs. But the pictures he takes really grab me.
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 21:25:48   #
MisterWilson wrote:
I married a clarinet player, and none of her talent has clung to me. She also dislikes computers and cameras. So, we're a good pair.



:thumbup:
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 20:14:10   #
MisterWilson wrote:
Ha! I don't have one bit of musical creativity. I envy those who do, like Rbrylawski. Want to trade?


Gladly. Once I realized my clarinet wasn't going to put a Mercedes in my garage I put it away (LOL), but becoming suddenly photographically creative would be awesome!
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 20:03:53   #
timmah1979 wrote:
Rby,

Well keep at it. For me i am a little off center (ask anybody who knows me) and the way i view things are a little bit odd.

Growing up (i'm 34), i didn't keep alot of friends so i looked towards books, movies (especially the horror genre) and music to keep my busy.

I ended up with my first camera (kodak disc) at age 7. I had won it in a school contest and it kinda sat on the shelf for about a year because i just wasn't really into it. until 8/9 years old when Wrestling had come to town and i wanted to keep some memories (not to mention since it was MY hobby, i had to find ways to buy film, get it developed. My parents weren't going to pay for it!)

now keep in mind this was 1987/1988 Was a year of firsts for me, i was just getting interested in heavy metal music which if you know much about that particular genre they tend to be descriptive about what they are singing about and certain bands had certain niches they sang about (Megadeth-politics, Guns N Roses-L.A. Scene. Bands like Danzig and Slayer were occult themed...you get the idea) toss this in with seeing my first horror movie (Nightmare on Elm St 3) and getting interested in Stephen King (The Stand was the first book i read WILLINGLY on my own outside of school and yes it was the unabridged version!) it created an influence heaven.

The more my senses got stimulated is when i started to think maybe, just maybe i had something to offer. These things i were getting into triggered an imagination. But the creative with the camera end didn't start happening until about 2002. Because i was hell bent on being a writer. I wanted to write a movie (horror ofcourse) but I was was stuck in what i called short story limbo. Words no matter how good something might have been i wasn't able to express it on paper. Now i wouldn't say i'm bad at words but i tend to go on these tangents and things get repeated and i can't write dialogue to save my life.

When digital photography came about (and my disc camera was no longer because i beat that into the ground from 1988-1997) it was a godsend because i could learn but also experiment more.

When your stuck with film (i am NOT knocking film at all. I gotta make that clear) but if you just use film, you have to worry about the extra costs (buying film, processing, ect ect) Digital you can edit, maneuver and pretty much do what you want (especially when you shoot raw!)

So in 2002 I started to experiment with some ideas. I have an ego, I will admit, or it could be stubbornness, that i have to be different. I want my photos to stick out from someone else.

I started to dive in heavy into just being different. I made sure i learned the basics (fstops, iso, ect) but i was gonna do things that, like my personality, were off.

Example, Sunflower. Anybody can take a picture of a sunflower. You take a picture of a sunflower and i take a picture of the same flower. Heck, we might even use the settings. The only thing that maybe make or break is the quality of the lens. Keep in mind i am not knocking Nikon or any camera for that matter. I am just using for purpose of discussion. but maybe the flaw in your camera lens has sharpness issues whereas mine wouldn't. But obviously could be fixed in a editing program. But to a viewer, what would make it really stand out? Most would say its just a flower and move on.

That wouldn't be good enough for me, I would have to put some kind of spin on it. Me, Anyone who has seen my stuff over the years knows i always put a slight subtle tilt on it. Sometimes its subtle, sometimes not so much but you will always know who's photo you are looking at.

But even without the tilt, i would make maybe some odd crop choices, maybe section off a petal (just one) to be black and white.

I like (and challenge myself) to put interesting things out. Everyone likes what they like but it is a definite need (for me) to be different. I even take old photos and merge/layer them with new photos to create something new and exciting.

Lots of influences. Lots of stuff to "feed my brain" and at the end of the day its how i digest it, turn it into new and exciting that gives me the ultimate satisfaction in knowing that i got someone to take that one second of their life and be like i never seen anything like that before.

Nobody taught me, i was very influenced but i learned on my own, took what i needed to and i think that's what ultimately happens. I don't thing creativity is learned. I think its digested or absorbed. Its what you do with that "energy" is how creative you are. I think everyone has creative in them but they need triggers. Me the trigger started 25 years ago with the entertainment i found refuge in and the finger hasn't let off yet (hopefully never will) for others, might not be so easy.

I think the key is do what interests you, force yourself to expand on it, ask yourself questions "What if I did this or that" or try looking at it completely differently and be like maybe if i flipped it on its side, changed the perspective maybe eye level instead of on top or bottom maybe even change the colors all together.

Don't be afraid to experiment. Remember though, its about what you like. Don't care so much what anyone thinks as long as you're happy with it. and most importantly don't be afraid to be different!!!
Rby, br br Well keep at it. For me i am a little ... (show quote)


Thanks! Maybe, just maybe there's hope for the creative side of me. One would think I could be creative. After all, I have a degree in Classical Clarinet and my music was creative. But my photos? That's another thing altogether. I marvel at people who see a way to frame something that creates something unique unique and interesting. Of course, I've always been super critical of myself. So maybe I should just enjoy the act of photography and hope that one day I can feel I contributed (even if in a small way) to the art of photography. Thanks again.......
Go to
Jan 23, 2014 19:14:36   #
I love this question. Really. Truth be told, I'm technically competent and creatively challenged. I know the settings on my camera (Nikon D7100) and how use them. My partner doesn't understand anything about the settings on his camera (Nikon D3200), yet if we're out taking a picture of the same subject, his picture is more interesting, while mine is more technical.

I'm not sure my mind thinks creatively and my photography suffers for it. And I don't know if I can be taught to be creative. I hope I'm wrong on that. I will be taking a class with a professional photographer locally in April. Maybe there's hope for the creative side of me, but only time will tell.
Go to
Jan 19, 2014 23:15:41   #
Adicus wrote:
Hi Anyone using the Canon 70D yet?. I'm thinking of upgrading from my 550d soon and wonder if anyone has any experience with this model yet on here, thanks


I'm a Nikon D7100 user, but there are many 70D threads here. Use search and you'll find plenty of commentary on the 70D, which btw., is a great camera.
Go to
Jan 19, 2014 11:28:49   #
If you were going on a Safari and needed deep reach to capture animals from a distance, the 18-300 would be a great option. But for a trip to Italy, the 18-200 VRII is likely all one could need. I've had mine for some time now and it's by far my most used lens. I wouldn't travel without it.
Go to
Jan 15, 2014 21:21:57   #
Bev wrote:
Can't thank you enough -you saved the day! Ever so grateful for your help.


So glad this was the solution.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 22:07:14   #
Got to be honest, I haven't posted many questions, but when I joined UHH a couple months ago, I was stunned at the amount of negativity I saw. I won't mention names, but there are certainly a few members who fight with each other and have a tendency to make a newbie feel unwelcome. None-the-less, I stuck around and am really glad I did. I've learned a lot and found that for the most part this forum is made of people who genuinely care about photography and they definitely take the time to answer a question honestly.

Good thread Jerry and one I hope reminds us that not all members are professional photographers and it's not just worth it, but fulfilling to help someone.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 21:57:38   #
mlkddk wrote:
My old reliable d80 won't auto focus and has been diagnosed with a wore out shutter release button. That said, I several problems. First is that I have been told it is a gray market camera. (thanks b&H, won't be buying anything from you again). Secondly, Nikon says they won't fix it because it is a gray market. Third, a reliable camera repair that will work on a Nikon seems to be non-existent in Denver. Ideas, recommendations?

Thanks
Mark


A google search found this in Englewood. Maybe they can help you: http://www.metrocamera.com/camera-repair
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 21:49:02   #
I'm guessing the camera not recognizing a card in the slot isn't that unusual. See the attached link and try what they suggest:

http://www.canon-europe.com/Support/Consumer_Products/products/cameras/Digital_SLR/EOS_5D_Mark_III.aspx?faqtcmuri=tcm:13-608089&page=1&type=faq
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 20:09:53   #
Glider wrote:
According to www.nikonusa.com, price of a D7100 is $1,199.xx, body only. Now maybe there is a better deal elsewhere, but other than cost, why would you stay with a cropped sensor if you could get a full frame sensor for close to the same money. You get versatility, better low light capability and more lens options. If you could buy a D700 for $1,200, the you could also buy a used but excellent 50mm f/1.8 for around $80 and you essentially have a D3 with a slower frame rate. No brainer!


You're making an assumption (erroneously btw) that everyone will find photographic nirvana by going full frame. I don't need or really want full frame, so it's not a no brainer for someone like me. And that's someone, who's very happy with crop sensor and the lenses I have for crop sensor. The D7100 I have is all the camera I need. It's likely more than I need, but I'm ever so grateful to have it none-the-less.
Go to
Jan 13, 2014 21:57:11   #
amehta wrote:
I'm disappointed with the idea of keeping it. If you contact them and they say keep it, that's fine. Otherwise, it is stealing.


+1 +1
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.