Posts for: bebo1998
Dec 30, 2014 16:03:04 #
Thruxton wrote:
This may have been discussed already but I searched and couldn't find it. Do any of the systems record and display the camera settings on the frame for future reference and analysis?
Isn't that the same as "properties"?
Dec 30, 2014 15:52:43 #
Dec 30, 2014 15:51:31 #
Clive22 wrote:
Thanks. So, that changed the white balance produced a lot less reds, or warmth. The metal looks almost malleable without the flash! Or something. lol.
Or something - HAH! I'm sooo tired.....zzzzzzzzzzzz
Dec 30, 2014 15:50:14 #
Nightski wrote:
For me that is just another vote for natural light.
I agree, Ms. Nightski
Dec 30, 2014 15:47:47 #
RichardQ wrote:
Hii, Bebo, thanks and a Happy 2015 to you, too. I thought you might be interested in this rare view of your Baltimore triple-antenna tower when it had SIX antennas on top. I shot this iin 1964. Of course, the 750-ft. platform was disassembled later.
my Aunt lived off of Falls Rd near the tower
Dec 30, 2014 14:27:39 #
Bill Emmett wrote:
My vote would be to go to KEH.com, I've had great ... (show quote)
KEH first, B&H then compare - love my Tamrons
Dec 30, 2014 14:15:18 #
Dec 30, 2014 14:00:46 #
RichardQ wrote:
Bebo, I just noticed you're in Baltimore. I took this photo of the construction of your TV tower in 1957 for some advertising. It's the kind of photography I did for many years, here and abroad.
I just saw this post of the tower on TV Hill. Sure would be a different view today, Richard. I hope you are well and Happy New Year.
Dec 30, 2014 13:53:10 #
ediesaul wrote:
Love this shot! Tells a story for sure!
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Dec 30, 2014 13:22:26 #
Clive22 wrote:
Version #2 is very nice. This thread isn't about pp, but if it were I would ask, if you wouldn't mind, what did you do to produce such a different result in the second photo? How did you remove the rust?
I went back into my file to get your answer - it appears as though the flash is the difference.
#1 was taken w/flash @28mm
I am posting a shot of the same area taken w/o flash 1 min. later (taken while he was at the fire)
#2 was taken (when he returned -1 more min.) w/o flash @28mm - that is why there is a slight shift in POV.
no flash
Dec 30, 2014 08:57:42 #
Jim McDonald wrote:
I don't know about replacing reading glasses, I wished someone would come up with an eye to replace the one I lost. Glass (actually they're plastic now) ones cost $ 1000. And you still can't see with them😂
Someday....who knows. Kept your sense of humour, didn't you?
:thumbup:
Happy New Year.
Dec 30, 2014 08:53:30 #
Bobbee wrote:
They just did something similar to me. I now have 20/20 in my right.
Was it cataract surgery? It took a while for my eyes to settle down (lots of floater issues at first).
Hope you have some good results also. Let me know.
B
Dec 30, 2014 08:30:50 #
Clive22 wrote:
Version #2 is very nice. This thread isn't about pp, but if it were I would ask, if you wouldn't mind, what did you do to produce such a
different result in the second photo? How did you remove the rust?
different result in the second photo? How did you remove the rust?
I'll have to re-think the process, (5 years ago) but I use Smart Photo Editor a lot. A little goes a long way. I'll pm you later. Ok?
Dec 30, 2014 08:26:58 #
Graham Smith wrote:
Human interest is always good in street scenes, the small boy furtively approaching the café for a late night ice cream fix perhaps?
I hope, I hope, I hope:-)
Graham you are quite the story teller :thumbup:
Dec 30, 2014 08:15:39 #
xxredbeardxx wrote:
Wonderful series.. Thanks for sharing.
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Thanks Red,
It is hard to imagine the carnage that took place there. The area is beautifully maintained and respected.