donrent wrote:
Oh go have another beer.............
Yes, time for a Guinness Black Lager.
tschmath wrote:
Dietxanadu wrote:
Time to close up the Chit Chat area.
This is supposed to be a photographic forum. I can see know real use for a Chit Chat area.
Any question that does not have to do with taking photographs should not be posted in the first place.
Area
Every forum I've been on always has an off topic category. Why not let people share other things? No one is forcing you to look at it, and you seem to start more threads that anyone else. Stay away from the chit chat thread and we'll all be better off.
quote=Dietxanadu Time to close up the Chit Chat a... (
show quote)
Just a thought, at lease I still have them, thoughts that is
MWAC wrote:
first off I never said this was a sexual photo I said the focus was on the crotch region of the subject, just like I would say if it was a photograph of a male and he was sitting with his legs open, your eyes would focus on that area of the image. That normally is not what you want your viewers eyes to focus on.
Second, Dietxandu's posting history is shall we say, eccentric for a lack of a better word. He has posted in the general discussion forum about taking pictures of a young woman who was tied up against her will (that post has since been removed by the admin), a pastor's daughter that was sexual abused by her father and the town and church covering it up, 1/2 naked pictures of young girls found in the trash when he was younger, a man watching young boys shower when he was in high school, an infatuation with an other young lady, the list goes on and on.
He is a strange man and yes that is me wording it nicely. I'm glad I don't know him personally, because if he said the things to me that he has posted here on this board I would recommend he speak to a professional ASAP.
first off I never said this was a sexual photo I s... (
show quote)
Oh are you back again? I thought you said you were ever going to read or comment on any of my posting but here you are again.
Yes I do see your point, The picture was not framed right. It was just a picture, but it does lead one to view more into the picture then should be.
As for the posting of the young women being tied up and pictures being taken, it was just an old story from my white trash train club. I was not the one taking the pictures. It was just a stupid thing to do with a camera. And yes admin has taking it down. It would be nice if they blocked some of the ads that Google puts up on the forum also.
As for the pore girl who was sexual abused, it was a family member, not her step father who did the deed.
As for the photos found by a few boys in a trash can, I never said they were naked. They were in there unties (tops and bottom).
Not being a boy, you would not have to go though the Are you gay stuff
The posting about wondering if a sexy 30 year old women, who always turn advances down, I was wondering how she would be 40 years later.
If you are using the infatuation with another young lady in relation to Peaches. Shame on you. We have been pals for almost 15 year now. I do not understand why she comes and goes, but maybe thats just the way she is.
Have you even gotten any kindness from God? Has your life been all black and white? Maybe you dont know how to give kindness to someone. I forgive you, and dont hold any hard thoughts about you. I wish you all the best.
Maybe in a few years you can post some feel back to one of my pictures.
Take care,
Your bother in Christ
Diet
JimH wrote:
I see a misshapen blue mass. No face, not even on the dog. Absolutely no interest in the shot. As far as MWAC is concerned, I think she's right. It's not even a good snapshot, for my money, and you asked.
Thank you for your posting, it was very kind.
The picture that I posted is of a pal and my dog. That was it. I never thought anyone would see / read into it any thing other then just what it was. A simple picture of women on a table with a white dog next to her.
The fact that I have now been labeled crazy and in need of mental help is unkind and not called for. I try to treat each of you as I would hope you would treat me. Sometimes things get going to fast and I say stuff I dont mean. But I do enjoy all of your input.
Diet
tschmath wrote:
Dietxanadu wrote:
I'm moving this thread to the right area.
So it seems that Volvo is moving its headquarters to Shippensburg, PA.
That would be Volvo, non car division, as Ford now owns Volvo cars. But is seems now Ford has sold Volvo cars to a Chinese company called Geely Group.
Volvo already owns both Renault Trucks and Mack Trucks.
So does this mean that they will be building there Volvo trucks and maybe Renault / Mack trucks at this new plant?
As far as moving its headquarters to America from Sweden, I dont see why. Setting up there American truck headquarters in PA makes since, but not moving its global headquarter here.
Just my thoughts, I could be wrong
Diet
PS: It seems that Volvo has acquired Nissan Diesels as well.
I'm moving this thread to the right area. br br S... (
show quote)
All I could find online is that Volvo is moving a transmission assembly plant to the U.S. This is from a release by the Heavy Duty Manufacturers Association dated Nov. 14, 2011.
As to the headquarters move, the only thing I could find was that Volvo is moving its North American headquarters from California back to its original site, Rockleigh, New Jersey. The facility in Shippensburg, PA is a manufacturing facility they've owned since 2006. They make heavy duty road building equipment there. You can see the info if you Google Volvo Construction Equipment.
Where do you get your information?
quote=Dietxanadu I'm moving this thread to the ri... (
show quote)
Internet auto groups, stories
Time to close up the Chit Chat area.
This is supposed to be a photographic forum. I can see know real use for a Chit Chat area.
Any question that does not have to do with taking photographs should not be posted in the first place.
Area
Pepper wrote:
stevenelson wrote:
So it took a tornado to bring you out of hiding. That is so sad.
MWAC wrote:
Please be safe and keep your weather radios turned on, we have had more than a couple of tornados reportly touched down in the last few minutes.
(hugs to everyone)
That's really not a true statement. MWAC has mentioned her location in numerous threads. She's not actually hiding but as she said in another thread she just doesn't feel the need to advertize her location in every post she makes.
quote=stevenelson So it took a tornado to bring y... (
show quote)
No need to know where someone lives. Like what 1 in 1000 chase that any of us will ever meet. The lady has the right to not say where she lives.
Maybe they should just remove the Location part of your email heading.
Diet
wrr wrote:
I understand MWAC's position completely. I've never tried to hide on the internet, I own several websites and my information is totally out there. Name, address and phone number. If you want it I'm not hard to find. So when I started on this forum I didn't think anything of putting all my info in the bio. That all changed about two months ago. There is a ahole on here that took exception to me being a storm chaser. Thinks that's the dumbest thing he has ever heard of, that I am a menace to society. This guy rarely post and I wasn't even aware of him until I got a phone call one day. Then a letter in the mail, some emails and this guy starts threatening me. The short of it is that I got my attorney involved who in turn got law enforcement involved. I'm fairly sure that the situation is under control now.
So if someone on here wants to say they live Somewhere East Of Crazy, I'm down with that!
I understand MWAC's position completely. I've neve... (
show quote)
By the way, what does a storm chaser do? The ones on the cable shows just seem to get as close as they can with out being killed. So are you doing it as a photographer? If so, please post, I would love to seen them.
Diet
Wabbit wrote:
Tornadoes in Dallas: Twisters touch down, tractor-trailers tossed
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/tornadoes-dallas-twisters-touch-down-national-weather-issues-200159831.html
Why would anyone live in a area that tornadoes can happen at any moment. And why all the flat sided buildings in a area that gets a lot of tornadoes?
jfrrn117 wrote:
That's the bigger question, sould have been in the permanent file of those whose pictures were taken.....Whaat were boys doing in trash?
I guess you were never a 15 yr old boy.
When I was 15 we were all scared that we mite be gay. Not that any of us knew what being gay was. Well maybe it was being like the guy who would watch us take showers after gym class.
Diet
Pepper wrote:
jfrrn117 wrote:
That's the bigger question, sould have been in the permanent file of those whose pictures were taken.....Whaat were boys doing in trash?
I would say just snooping, not at all uncommon for 15 year old boys. I'd say the bigger question is if these photos existed why were they handled in such an irresponsible manner?
Pepper you calling me a Liar also?
How they got into a open trash can at the south west corner of the school (34* 09' 13.88 N 118* 23' 15.17 W) is a easy one. Some boy (s) found it in a proper trash can and took it. At some point they got scared and ditch the pictures and cards in the trash can.
Just because I may tell a few tall tails, does not mean I'm a liar.
dirtpusher wrote:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120305.html
No: Hollywood sound stage and Photoshop. No one is really up there.
Diet
RTR wrote:
I am taking a trip next week to visit my son in Long Beach, CA. I will have a free day to sight see and be a tourist. Does anyone have any suggestions of a 'must see while in the L.A. area' attraction?
Wow, well there is the Port of Los Angeles if you line big ships. San Pedro if you like an old fishing town. Queen Mary if you like big old ships. Redondo Beach Pier if you like what use to be.
Marina del Rey, has a nice Marina, Lots of old Missions in the area. Angles Nation Forest and Cleveland Nation Forest for big trees and back to nature.
Diet
PS: You could stop by Hollywood and punch me in the nose. Lot of folks around here would love to see that picture.