CHG_CANON wrote:
Film for me is just something different to be interesting. Film changes my approach down to picking a subject and a film to match. With digital I just pick a prime or zoom focal length and shoot away, as often and as much as needed to be confident I have a good result to find later.
With film, I try to make every frame count and don't take a second frame of the same subject unless I think I misfired the first one. But, I think I come away more conservative in film shooting too. I don't try a crazy angle or very artistic wide open aperture, where in digital I can walk all the settings, if desired, tossing those that don't work.
Focus for me is critical, so I've given up on manual focus lenses and film. I also will select an IS-enabled lens over the non IS lenses, if I don't bring along the tripod. But, developing the film gives me zero interest. I edit all the scans in LR where probably my 35mm film has more of a digital look than slides.
Beyond all the process / how aspects of shooting film, I like the 'look' of the results. Even very sharp film and lenses still have a 'softer' look than pure digital. Some of the new color films are as grain free as digital. I've been working with mostly expired color film recently that also give more of a 'film look' as in the consumer-grade 70s / 80s look. For B&W I'm always trying for a museum-quality or something you might find in a nice restaurant decorated with B&W prints, an example of that more conservative approach.
Film for me is just something different to be inte... (
show quote)
Here is an example of the comparison between digital and analog photography. It may look a little stupid but I think it shows the differences in life and technology. It is a screen capture so it may be a little fuzzy. Take a look! I think it makes a statement.